Nikki being a silly little girl

Poor little Nikki Kaye doesn’t seem to have got the hang of parliament, and especially that politics is a team game where you may have arguments with your team behind the scenes, and you don’t shit on a minister in the house (even when that minister is a red-faced ginga git). Obviously if everyone has always told you how special you are you start believing it, and don’t learn to listen.

In Parliament yesterday, National’s Auckland Central MP, Nikki Kaye, challenged Environment Minister Nick Smith to assure Aucklanders that valuable trees would be listed before 2012.

Dr Smith said he would write to each council in Greater Auckland and ask for its work programme for listing new trees.

There is an internal process that little Nikki has gone through with National, and lost because she is out of touch with what National wants. It is not nationalisation of trees by “tree idiots” as Stephen Franks calls them. This process includes caucus committees, select committees, caucus, talking informally to the minister and the rest of your caucus, working with the select committee chair, and lobbying them hard. But when the party decides against your opinion you follow the whip in public. This is a pretty simple career enhancing move that our special Nikki doesn’t seem to have understood. It is a bit like not shitting on your supporters and your campaign team, because even if they are not certified senior MPs so worth greasing, they are actually quite essential to winning at the next election, a simple fact that may be eluding special Nikki.

I wonder what special little Nikki is planning to do outside of parliament in 2011? Or is she going to switch sides and hold Auckland Central for Labour? Or is she the next Winston Peters? And why is Nikki messing up the chances of any other under 30 making into Nationals caucus by behaving like a spoilt child? Maybe she wasn’t smacked as a child and is an advertisement against the Section 59 amendment?

  • mediatart

    So this being rammed through under urgency is all about going through the right processes ?
    Nick Nutter Smith has got his knickers in a twist over how omnipotent he is – again- while Nikki will be cast out when the ballots are counted , not the telephone polls

  • Anonymouse

    Bullshit whale. Nick Smith has held his seat since 1990 by standing up for local concerns ahead of the party every now and then. Nikki is the dragon slayer of the National Party. So she should stand up for things like this when she feels strongly about it.

  • Naylor

    Anonymouse whatever! Nick has stopped throwing the yellowpages at his staff years ago, and while that has nothing to do with little Nikki, it shows that he's a survivor. By constantly listening to Michelle Boag's advice about how to be an MP (strange last time I looked she was never an MP or did the hard yards) little Nikki is pandering to the rainbow crowd in Ponsonby and trying to be all things to all people… which won't work. What does she stand for anyway?

  • Pingback: Tree rules get the axe « Red Alert

  • The Baron

    I've seen Nicki in action a few times now, and being an Auckland Central voter, I'm distinctly underwhelmed. To be perhaps a tad too unkind, she seems a little retarded really – not a good speaker, can't really articulate any sort of vision, and too willing to be drawn into petty little debates like this.

    The only good thing she has done is taken out the infinitely more retarded Judith Tizard. Not really a high bar. I think Twyford will definitely give her a run for her money in Auckland Central come 2011.

  • Anon

    The baron is right. Nikkis maiden speech was utterly terrible and it has not got much better from then.

    She looks like she is working hard, but then so do all slow learners.

  • Spanishbride

    Without giving too much away I was very unimpressed with a certain so called thank you gift that was really a piss right off don't need you anymore gift.
    And what was it? This reward for hours of unpaid work?
    It was a varnished paper over board fish to hang on the wall. At least it looked a little like a fish. Hard to tell really.
    Felt more like a slap in the face.

  • http://www.blairmulholland.co.nz Blair

    Agree totally with the Baron. Nikki will be turfed out by Phil Twyford in 2011 and nobody will miss her.

    Having said that, since when were government backbenchers supposed to pay more respect to government ministers than their own constituents? That’s not the way it works in Britain, where backbenchers recognise that the minister is there at their expense, and must perform or be dumped.

    Backbenchers should criticise ministers. That is their job.

  • harpoon

    Crumbs … what did she do to offend you? And did I miss the bit where you said you were utterly wrong to promote Kaye during the election?

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/Whaleoil Whaleoil

      She was 100% better than Judith Tizard or a re you going to defend Tizard?

      • Harpoonz

        Wot? Defend Tizard? Not me. She was dim, arrogant, lazy, and a crap Minister who if she hadn't been an old mate of Helen's would have been fired for incompetence years ago.

        But getting back to what you think of Nikki … during the election campaign, did you think the same of her as you do now? If so, why did you promote her? Because of 'anyone but Tizard' is a bit weak. If you thought she was wonderful a year ago and think she's rubbish now, precisely what has changed? Did she tell you to get whukked or something? Maybe your powers f character assessment were temporarily swiched off during the election campaign…? :-P