University of East Anglia broke the law

The university at the centre of the climate change row over stolen e-mails broke the law by refusing to hand over its raw data for public scrutiny.

The University of East Anglia breached the Freedom of Information Act by refusing to comply with requests for data concerning claims by its scientists that man-made emissions were causing global warming.

The Information Commissioner’s Office decided that UEA failed in its duties under the Act but said that it could not prosecute those involved because the complaint was made too late, The Times has learnt. The ICO is now seeking to change the law to allow prosecutions if a complaint is made more than six months after a breach.

Oh I expect we will see the Warm-mongers all light up with the “It was for a good cause” excuse.

Sorry that excuse won’t wash. If the University of East Anglia and the CRU in particular were prepared to violate the Freedom of Information Act it doesn’t take much of leap, actually just a small step, to realise that on the balance of probability they probably fabricated the data to show warming where there was none.

Who ever hacked/stole/leaked the emails needs to be given a medal for revealing to the world the deep fraud of the few that has brought the Climate Change industry to its knees.

Now we need official investigations into what is real and what is not. We now know pretty much that AGW is a myth, fabricated with dodgy data and corrupt computer programs designed by corrupt “scientists”.

I won’t hold my breath waiting for apologies from the warm-mongers. I do want to see Al Gore and Pachauri stripped of their Nobel peace prize as it was issued under false pretenses based on a figment of one of Pachauri’s employees imagination and the perpetrated as a fraud upon the world.

  • inversesquare

    WOW Anon!!

    Something up?

    You sound like a religious WACKO!!

    Hows about that science!!

    Today's link from inversesquare might just have to be….hmmmmm…let me think…..I know!!

    http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/10/22/a-little-kn

    How about those predictions!!….

    OH the humanity!!!

    Side note….for realclimate.com readers…..the building in these pictures is where Jim and Gav work! you know….the guys that are in the emails?…..yes those guys!!…..mates with mike….you know mike mann (he's got some amazing nature tricks) you mean Gav…as in Gavin SchMUCKidt?….yes!! the very same….you know….Jim's mate Gav from the GISS!! AWESOME!!

  • Lion King

    Yes this global warming is crap. There is a lot more to it. Its just a money raising execise with Al Gore & co.
    Here is a link to other interesting articles.
    http://www.fcpp.org/issues.php?issue_id=12
    Looks like we could be in for some global cooling.

  • The Gantt Guy

    So, when is Key going to announce Quota Smith’s retirement, the pausing of the ETS and the establishment of a Commission of Inquiry into Climate Change “science”, NIWa’s role and New Zealand’s response?

  • anon

    What a cock WhaleOil. If anyone needed a reason to prove that you're a pathetic, attention-seeking unprincipled piece of slime, it's your previous post. After wanking on about how you wouldn't talk about certain things on principle, blah blah, you show how full of shit you are. Not that I'm sure anyone is surprised.

  • http://www.nightcitytrader.blogspot.com Elijah Lineberry

    I think this will be the tip of the iceburg as an avalanche of “opps, we were telling fibs to earn a quid” revelations emerge in the next year or two.

    Global Warming was a fraud from day one. Simple as that. End of

  • Pete

    Anon : no wonder you didn't attached a name to this post! What was it you said about rocks, and slime? I guess you also know about effluent since you appear to be full of it.
    Great contribution – not!
    Pete.

  • http://waitakerenews.blogspot.com mickysavage

    Wow that is it. I am now convinced. One university out of hundreds tried to stop insane people from getting access to their data so that they would not then be subject to a myriad of requests for refinement of the information to arrive at a result that the insane people thought was, well, sane.

    It is clear to me now that there is a conspiracy to stop the view of wingnuts from gaining mainstream acceptance. The conspiracy is based on the firmly held belief that the aforesaid wingnuts are, well, insane, and their world view should never be allowed any standing or credence. If their view was allowed credence, well, the world would melt in about 30 years time and some of the population would be denying that the melting was actually taking place.

    Happy to debate …

    • _DC

      Mickey you are a moron.
      East Anglia is one university out of hundreds? So there were hundreds of universities collecting raw climate data?

      • http://waitakerenews.blogspot.com mickysavage

        No thousands. I was suggesting that one university acted slightly inappropriately and you should not write off every single western University's academic analysis.

        • Pete

          Actually East Anglia / Hadley CRU is one of 4 major institutions producing global temperature information.It is not hundreds. Individual nations such as NZ supply their 'value added' climate data and these four organisations do the analysis and publish the results. Also the source data used is the same although each centre does its own manipulation of the source data. There is now significant evidence to suggest that the other centres (NASA etc) are equally unreliable. NASA is a joke. They have made so many corrections to the official record that they have lost credibility.
          You know the theme GIGO!. The recent paper by surfacestations.org has now cast very significant doubt on the extent of warming this century, and it can be said that AGW is most unlikely.
          All this is a dam shame because the science has suffered, the world has been distracted by a non problem and precious resources have been diverted from food production to bio fuels. All in all a giant cluster thingy!! As for all these people with their snouts in the trough.
          A final point is that if these plonkers had followed proper scientific method in the first place the data and methods of analysis would have been available and there would have been no need for a FOIA request. You a such an apologist for these people. For gods sake stop wasting everyones time with this drivel about poor scientists been driven insane by countless requests. THERE IS NO EVIDENCE OF COUNTLESS REQUESTS, but don't let that stop you. There wasn't a holocaust was there, and I gues Elvis is still in the building!
          Jeez!!!

          • Hagues

            Haha Micky just got the smackdown.

            PS Micky CRU had to provide the info by law, so whether or not it was going to be an incovenience doesn't matter, it was not 'inappropriate' behaviour it was illegal.

          • http://intensedebate.com/people/Chiefsfan73 Chiefsfan73

            To quote from The Shooter "there were WMD's in Iraq, and Anna Nicole married for love"
            Mickey you are a joke

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/billhicks billhicks

    Green peace(of shit)..Have helped write to write sum of the fairy tales on so called global warming for the ipcc http://wattsupwiththat.com/ No doubt most of green peace are ginger ginershttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NNSJdqiAfPs&fe

  • inversesquare

    Mickey……do you know what the acronym 'HADCRU3' stands for?….. I'll give you some clues…. Famous NZ cricketer and a research unit at the university of East Anglia…..

    Do some clicking on the inta-web here are some questions you might want to ask (and then wonder why journalists don't)….

    a) Who uses the HADCRU3 surface temp data? (hint….it's not just the CRU)
    b) Who 'lost' all their raw data, but still has lots of 'value added' data with a lovely formula that seems to always make everything look much hotter than it was when the data was RAW….
    c) Who is it that says 'trust us' our value added data is Sweet!….no need to check it (sorry you can't anyway cause we LOST it…..I mean arn't allowed to…. I mean….. we have already…. I mean…. Oh Dam! they've seen the emails!!
    c) Do you think that the people that designed the computer you are sitting in front of used the same sort of scientific methodology… (hint….the answer is NO)

    Meanwhile:
    http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2008/01/0

    Go the Bio Fuel!!

    Chairman Mao anyone?

  • Lord Montrose

    When are you going to tell us what DPF's "somewhat provocative conclusion" at NBR was? We need to know.

  • Pingback: Tweets that mention University of East Anglia broke the law | Whale Oil Beef Hooked | Gotcha! -- Topsy.com