Grant Robertson forgets his time under Clark

The government is investigating leaks by Labour rats weasels moles sympathisers in Public Service.

Grant Robertson is aghast and filled with faux outrage;

Labour’s state services spokesman Grant Robertson said the leaks were a result of the Government’s secrecy about important public issues, and that it needed to look at its own handling of them instead of starting a “witch-hunt”.

In relation to public sector restructuring, he said the Government had not even talked to key stakeholders involved in areas affected by the proposed mergers in the state sector.

“Mucking around with agencies like the Food Safety Authority and Archives New Zealand” had far-reaching consequences for the public, which didn’t appear to be having a say, Mr Robertson said.

He said he understood the investigations had been underway for more than a week and appeared to be a result of pressure from ministers.

“Given the Government’s handling of these issues it is not surprising that public servants want to blow the whistle.

“The Government is serial leaker of information when it suits them. They need to take a good look in the mirror, rather than wasting resources on a witch-hunt of these whistleblowers.”

But Grant forgets that there is a thing called Google and they even have handy graphics to aid with searchs of a particular item, like…oh I don’t know…uhmmmm…maybe something like “State Services Commission leaks investigation“. Grant worked in the Prime Minister’s office until 2005. How come all these stories weren’t a waste of government resources pursuing a witch-hunt.

2001
Nov 29, 2001 – The inquiry, ordered by Defence Minister Mark Burton, is under the authority of the State Services Commission and is part of a wider investigation into the leaking of defence force information. It is being carried out by Wellington lawyer Douglas White QC and former secretary of
From Army PR man called before inquiryRelated web pages
www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1 …

2004
Feb 26, 2004 – Queen’s Counsel Kit Toogood will conduct the inquiry for the State Services Commission into the leaking of legal documents from Helen Clark’s Mt Albert electorate office, but his questioning is limited to the role of Immigration and electorate office workers.
From Opposition predicts ‘whitewash’ in leaked-letter inquiryRelated web pages
www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1 …

And how about all these stories after his time but still under the control of the Heleban in Clarkistan.

2006 May 5, 2006 – Telecom has finished its own investigation into the leak of the document. Public affairs manager John Goulter says Telecom has carried out its internal investigation and passed the results on to the State Services Commission. Goulter says the investigation was comprehensive and reaches
From Telecom profit plungesRelated web pages
tvnz.co.nz/content/710846

May 8, 2006 – Last night, Telecom spokesman John Goulter would not comment on whether the report names the leak, but said it was comprehensive and would aid the SSC’s investigation. The SSC inquiry will have the powers to summon witnesses and request evidence from Telecom as well as other Government
From Leak not from my office, says ClarkRelated web pages
www.nzherald.co.nz/section/story.cfm?c_id=280 …

May 8, 2006 – However, he said Telecom’s inquiry reached “firm conclusions” and he believed the SSC’s investigation would be “quite swift” as a result. The SSC will not comment on that aspect. A spokeswoman said today it would be a “fair and thorough” process. Prime Minister Helen Clark,
From Telecom leak inquiry could be swiftRelated web pages
www.nzherald.co.nz/section/story.cfm?c_id=1 …

May 12, 2006 – National is calling for the State Services Commission to reveal where the mole who leaked sensitive information about Telecom was employed. National’s deputy leader Gerry Brownlee says the investigation is useless without clarifying where the leak came from.
From Broadband mole identifiedRelated web pages
tvnz.co.nz/view/page/488120/713119

May 13, 2006 – “I would like to thank the various parties, including Telecom, for their swift co-operation with the investigation process,” he said. Telecom is thought to have told the State Services Commission the name of the leaker. The National Party is pointing the finger at the Beehive,
From Speculation rife as telco leak caughtRelated web pages
www.nzherald.co.nz/ministry-of-economic …

May 16, 2006 – The State Services Commissioner, Mark Prebble today released the findings of the State Services Commission investigation into the leak of a Cabinet paper to Telecom. Mark Prebble said the Cabinet paper was taken by Mr Michael Ryan, a Messenger employed by the Department of the Prime
From SSC Investigation Into Telecom LeakRelated web pages
www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PO0605/S00166.htm

May 24, 2006 – He does not accept the conclusion of a State Services Commission report which exonerated Mr Garty, and Telecom, from blame in receiving a Cabinet United Future holds the balance of power on the commerce select committee, which could conduct its own investigation into the leak.
From Telecom leak man rejects Clark’s attackRelated web pages
www.nzherald.co.nz/politics/news/article.cfm …

Grant is being a hypocrite, which is a shame because he is actually a nice bloke, and smart as well, in fact he probably is the new Brains Trust of the Labour Party, they just don’t know yet because the old warhorses are still supping at the trough.

  • gaskranken

    Ahhh Grant Robert Robertson eh….

    I remember Grant well from his time as head of the Otago University Student Union in the early 80′s when no one questioned the ethical dilemna of compulsary student union fees and Grant was very comfortable weilding a considerable amount of influence schmoozing the path between town and gown.

    I had no idea at the time but that was because he kept his closet door very securely locked but finding himself deep inside the cloistered safety of a well oiled back passage in Helengrad it was safe to come out and go for Wellington Central.

    Grant will always elbow his way into the best position at the trough even to the extent of bending over should it prove necessary.

    As he said to his partner on election night, `well darling this is politics, better get used to it honey!!!’

  • axeman

    And he obviously didn’t consult Dr. Math how to work out his percentage increases either. Earlier today on the Liarbore bogsite he said that the public sector only marginally increased as a percentage of the overall labour force(under Labour 2000-2008) There was a desperate need to rebuild after National systematically undermined public services through the 1990s. Tens of thousands of staff and other resources were cut which reduced capability and institutional memory, and saw the rise of consultants and contractors.

    A replier said that it would be useful to include the growth in the public service headcount during the 4th Labour Government so that the downsizing of the 1990s (under National)could be placed in context. The growth in head count over the 4 years from 2003 to 2007 is 41% and that is completely out of proportion with the growth in the overall labour force during the same time.

    Grant then said the statistics he was looking at show that as a percentage of the overall labour, the core public sector grew from 1.9% in 2003 to 2.2% 2007. He again said that is only a marginal increase.

    Back came the replier. The 0.3 percentage point increase from 1.9% to 2.2% that is pointed to, is actually a 15.8% increase. In other words Grant’s numbers assert that jobs in the core public sector grew by 15.8% faster than the overall labour force. That’s not a MARGINAL increase. And while Grant was looking at the core public service head counts for the 1980s perhaps he could also add in the head counts for non-core public service roles and the front-line agencies that are outside the cap. Grant skated over the increase of 540 fulltime equivalents in CYFS, WINZ and probation services in the past year like Torvill and Dean.

    No reply 10 hours later.