Questions that need answers

“Gore suffers from Narcissistic Personality Disorder,” says Henry I. Miller, a physician and molecular biologist, a fellow at Stanford University… See More’s Hoover Institution who was formerly an official at the NIH and FDA.“But for the separation of science and religion,” he [Al Gore] laments, “we might not be pumping so much gaseous chemical waste into the atmosphere and threatening the destruction of the earth’s climate balance.” But for the separation of science and religion, we would still be burdened with the notion that the sun and the planets revolve around the Earth. It gets worse. Throughout the [his] book [Earth in the Balance] Gore employs the metaphor that those who believe in technological advances are as sinister and polluters are as evil as the perpetrators of the Holocaust. He accuses Americans of being dysfunctional because we’ve developed “an apparent obsession with inauthentic substitutes for direct experience with real life,” such as “Astroturf, air conditioning and fluorescent lights … Walkman and Watchman, entertainment cocoons, frozen food for the microwave oven,” and so on.The criteria for this diagnosis, as described in the psychiatrist’s bible, the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, include a “pervasive pattern of grandiosity (in fantasy or behavior), need for admiration and lack of empathy, beginning by early adulthood and present in a variety of contexts,” as indicated by these manifestations:
“A grandiose sense of self-importance (e.g., exaggerates achievements and talents, expects to be recognized as superior without commensurate achievements).” Gore regularly demonstrates his grandiosity.
“Preoccupied with fantasies of unlimited success, power, brilliance, beauty or ideal love; believes that he or she is ’special’ and unique and can only be understood by, or should associate with, other special or high-status people (or institutions).” These sorts of fantasies run riot in Gore’s book Earth in the Balance, in which he assumes that he and a small number of other elites have divined the solutions to the world’s problems and the bold and dramatic measures that await the education and enlightenment of the public.

In my view – global warming is the biggest fraud ever foisted on us apart from Helen Clark being awarded an order of merit via the punkawallah governor general of “multi-stuffed-cultural NZ”

Augie Auer now deceased – from TV3 was virulently opposed to global warming and unfortunately died not so long ago. He was a meterorologist of some standing.

Im no scientist – but i smell a rat. I wonder whether Its not so much a conspiracy – just a group of self interested overqualified boffins looking for the next research grant and a nobel prize (jeez they gave one to Obama before he did anything .. and we’re all stil waiting) – a group of people who cant bring themselves to admit that they have only presented data that supports their conclusions.

Fact – undeniable fact … NO country on this earth can afford to fund, pay for or suffer under the regime that the global warming / Kyoto protocol flakes want us to. We cant do it. What are they suggesting – we live in caves – or all commit hara kiri so the whales can play unhindered (and I like whales -the real ones).

Cheers
G

Garry
What I don’t get about those who advocate global warming is a conspiracy(like Ian Wishart and obviously you) is why would leaders like John Key and nearly all those in the western world buy into it even though it will clearly cost? Key is no fool. He understands money if nothing else. Sorry, but while we may look back and say this was all a mistake (GW may never happen) I can’t accept all the conspiracy stuff. Just does not make any real sense

gidday terryafic … nope i wasnt suggesting it was a conspiracy especially if you read what i wrote. I was suggesting the opposite as i saw it .. apologies for not making that clear.

I guess we must instead be content with your argument – if john key and the rest of the leaders of the western world buy into it (global warming) even though it will clearly cost – then hey … lets accept it. And John Key understands money – if nothing else. The logic is irrefutable.

I now feel much better.

Thanks

A very humbled and most grateful G Cheers mate and thanks for the feedback

Here is an excellent article on a world renowned meterorologist back in the nineties who was made to clear his desk and resign.
In a newspaper column he had disproved the
claims about climate change.

http://www.probeinternational.org/files/UKVersieHenkTennekes.pdf

Please point to where Al Gore said there would be more tornadoes in February. If he said that then hes really dumb. Tornadoes happen in summer, february is the northern hemisphere winter. Not at all suprising that there were no tornadoes.

“How come when we have supposed to have had the hottest decade ever (well, since records began) we have also had the snowiest decade on record?”

… because the manipulated data derived from land-based weather-station temperatures is wrong, along with the satellite data that is calibrated against it. Snow needs cold – the presence of significantly more snow means the temperatures are lower and comfirms the inaccuracy of the manipulated data.

This could be an answer to a problem Governments have been struggling with for ever. How to Tax fresh air.