Investigate drops bombshell on Labour

All available lines to New York will be taken up tonight by Labour as they seek guidance from Helen Clark after Ian Wishart dropped a bombshell on Labour in the latest issue of Investigate. This is an epic Tory party style sex scandal, except all the players are Labour elite. It’s got the lot, gay sex, drunken parties, drugs, troughing and bribery.

The article is huge and can be summarised as follows:

  • Claims Tim Barnett encouraged a 14 year old to leave school to work in his office. Is this grooming?
  • Claims former Mayor Gary Moore also part of enticement with job offers. Labour pals stick together.
  • Truancy Officer was Labour supporter and aided and abetted truancy. More pals involved.
  • Government money used to fly 14 year old numerous times around country. Troughing.
  • Given free reign around parliament and Beehive as a 14-15 year old. WTF!
  • Had Speaker Jonathan Hunt intervening in favour of 14 year old with security at Parliament. What else was Hunt involved in?
  • Alleges Tim Barnett confides in 14 year old about Helen Clark, Heather Simpson and Judith Tizard being involved in lesbian affairs. First time this has aired in a major publication to my knowledge.
  • Alleges Chris Carter was phoned and intervened on 14 year old’s behalf with CYFS to release 14 year old.
  • Chris Carter denies knowing Hamish Jevan Goulter but Goulter has photos of Carters wedding on his Facebook page. Oh dear!
  • Chris Carter denies Goulter at wedding. Pants on Fire?
  • Chris Carter “remembers” pinging Goulter in parliament and “sending him home” to Christchurch. Very strange explanation
  • Investigate holds emails between Goulter and Chris Carter arranging wedding details Has Carter lied?
  • Barnett alleges that Goulter was trying to trace his birth mother and was emotional. Very strange reply to serious questions. How very intimate of Barnett to know all about the state of mind of a 14 year old.
  • Lianne Dalziel knowing Goulter but Investigate publishes a photo of them together. Oh dear, can Lianne ever tell the truth?
  • Dalziel apologises to Goulter in a Facebook chat for denying she knew him. Liar, Liar, pants on Fire.
  • Tim Barnett and Labour functionary and ADHB board member Dr. Ian Scott conspire to get drunk Goulter off work to continue partying. More grooming behaviour, two drunk older gay men assisting a drunk underage teenager to abscond from work.
  • Tim Barnett provided taxpayer funded taxi-chits to Goulter regularly. Oh they do trough don’t they.
  • Alleges Helen Clark overrode Jacinda Ardern on issue of Goulter drinking at Premier House. Jacinda Ardern so far is the only Labour person who looks like and acts like a person with responsibility.
  • Drank frequently with Michael Cullen, Lianne Dalziel, Ruth Dyson, and Annette King. Old soak eh Lianne? Always on the turps.
  • Goulter alleges he spent considerable time in Jonathan Hunt’s office and flat, alleges he could do what he likes.
  • Goulter alleges that Tim Barnett, his partner Ramon, Chris Carter, Charles Chauvel regularly smoked marijuana with him.
  • Alleges Chris Carter and him were in regular contact and Carter enjoyed being out with “twinkies”.
  • Alleges Michael Cullen also smoked Marijuana at Labour Conference.
  • Carter says “no cigarette has passed his lips in 30 years”. Interesting choice of description. I have never heard of a joint referred to as a “cigarette”.
  • Goulter alleges that Tim Barnett made homosexual advances on him.
  • Goulter alleges Barnett made him sit down on a chair with him, and lunged and tried to kiss him.
  • Goulter was at one time under the “care of the Speaker’s Office”. Whatever that is supposed to mean.
  • Alleges Judith Tizard paid Mika hush money to keep Goulter quiet in election year via Arts grants. I always wondered what Tizard actually did, now we know, she allegedly paid the bribes.

This is a truly spell-binding article. The details are very clear but I don’t doubt that there is a fair bit of embellishment. Basically Jacinda Ardern is the only person coming out of this story looking completely normal, sensible even. That must surely be a worry for the Labour Party if Jacinda Ardern looks sensible.

Tim Barnett is pictured, by Goulter, as a typical poof, preying on/grooming youngsters and trying to cheat on his partner. Basically a mini-me Chris Carter with out the camel jockeys. It is clear that Goulter is (or was) a teenage star-chaser  and no doubt rated his access a lot higher than the reality was.

However you have to ask what possible motive could a member of parliament have for allowing a troubled teen who has basically been exited from school hang around with him to the extent that he did.

Barnett has been caught lying and so has Chris Carter. Especially the wedding angle. And that sad old poof Jonathon Hunt needs to be asked some hard questions too.

This story shows pretty much the entire senior echelon of Labour with the exception of Jacinda Ardern and Phil Goff (ironically described as “a bit of a nobody”) seem to be a bunch of fag-hags, pederasts and perverts who once they get a little bit of power will use it unwisely.

The one who got caught out in the biggest lie however was Lianne Dalziel who facebooked to Goulter how she had lied about knowing him! Actually I would go so far as to call it outrageous that a child is allowed to attach himself to the inner core of the Labour government, with access to parliament to seemingly come and go as he pleases and have what can only be described as an inappropriate relationship with non family adult males.

Barnett’s alleged comments about the bulldog and the Clark/Simpson/Tizard triangle of terror is priceless. Pure gold.

One thing that doesn’t hold true to me about the traditional description of Clark’s Labour governemnt is that it doesn’t appear that Heather Simpson knew anything about it otherwise the kid’s bum would be whacked back to Mincer Mika faster than you could say “oh Helen”. I simply can’t imagine she would be loose enough politically to let an uppity, teenage bi-sexual drama-queen near the circle of influence. I know real bad pun.

The one thing in Goulters favour is he had the good sense to call Tony Milne and Michael Wood names…plus he hates Jacinda, and writes off Young Labour as “a bunch of smelly fat unattractive people”. Two words people, Sonny and Thomas.

A truly bizarre account of the inner working of Labour. Now we watch and see what falls out. There are certainly some large inconsistencies in the stories but also some information that could only have been gleaned by actually being there on the inside.

  • clintheine

    This is truely the stuff of legend. It would have been easily sorted if it wasn’t for all the Labour MPs telling porkies!

  • inventory2

    This is dynamite stuff from Wishart. Doubtless there will be howls of indignation from those named, and all manner of threats of legal action. But when was the last time that Wishart actually got sued?

  • scanner

    Pure gold, on second thoughts Mangrove can wait, this one is going to gain legs real quick.
    Now we just need to wait for the Labour party version of the Destiny Church to come flying in here claiming its “all lies”.
    My how things have changed since the head witch has left town

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1201173949 petal

    Meh. Whatever Wishart publishes is ignored by the MSM out of spite, so it never gets any legs. If this leads to resignations and/or court cases, I’ll log on with my real credentials WO. ;) (No point offering to eat a hat)

    It does however show how basically and thoroughly corrupt the Labour Party had become. It also explains how the Carters of the world continue with the sense of Teflon Entitlement they are displaying.

    It is going to take another 10 years for the rotten core to retire out of Labour. Policies aside, we can but hope they don’t manage to groom their successors with the same set of expectations and standards.

    Standards.

    I kill myself.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1201173949 petal

    Hmmm

    http://aaronandandy.blogspot.com/

    Looks Jev is running for Wellington Council.

    With all the name recognition, he’ll make it just fine.

  • inventory2

    petal – Wishart makes that clear in the story. Goulter is aware that skeletons are likely to come tumbling out of closets with him standing for council, so he’s front-footing it.

  • michaels

    Petal your spot on, the MSM won’t go near it as they have no balls at all.
    Wishart is no fool and would be damn sure of his facts before publishing, but still…… the MSM sleep.

    Sam Morgan not paying tax won’t sell papers but a story like this would.

  • Pingback: And alien tears will fill for him « The Dim-Post

  • marybelle

    Golly gosh – Helen Clark will hate Ian Wishart even more. Thank goodness we have Ian Wishart to tell untold stories that some thought had been dead and buried. Ian is what I call a proper reporter (not a repeater).

  • inventory2

    Bottom line Michaels – I won’t be buying any newspapers today, but I will be buying Investigate – Wishart 1; MSM 0

  • sexybeast

    I’m getting tired just reading it. I guess any hope of saving those National Parks from a energy generating dam is pretty much flushed away with this *sigh* Better opposition is needed. Hey….the Maori Party might do the trick!

  • scanner

    Watch mainstream media stay away from this story in droves until it gathers momentum, then the repeaters will be all over it like flies on shit.
    Wishart, love him or hate him, is one of the only true journalists left in this country, the rest are nothing but cut and paste merchants and have been left to troll the internet and pick through press releases and selectively regurgitate what they hold up as news.
    Sad really, most of the major daily’s are now not even not fit to be cut into strips and sold as toilet paper.

  • http://booktragic.blogspot.com pauleastbay

    If even only 5 % of whats written has legs , this is brilliant.

    Its just rings so true but there is so much more, what about Helens husband? Why is allowed to walk away after the deciets he has been involved in.

    The left / pink will be readying the attack on Wishart now, the first attacks will relate to his christianity and they will then fill up the blogs with crap.

  • chuck

    This goes to show how PC Labour is. Would anything have been said if the 14 year old was a girl and the MP a heterosexual male? I think something would have been said. I can only assume that many Labour MPs and party officials were scared to say too much for fear of being accused of being homophobic. Either that or they could see nothing wrong with a 14 year old boy having sex with mature adult male(s).

  • kulturkampf

    if you listen to this young fellow being interviewed on Radio – i gather, recently – you may come to the conclusion that this may (not certainly – but may be) a little deluded and grandstanding and enjoying primping and posturing. If it all turns out to be true – good reporting Mr Wishart and good ‘repeating’ and secondary regurgitation (pity it isnt ambergris … thats worth something but only Sperm Whales do that i think) mr whale – if its not – then i guess the ‘shit’ really will hit the fan.

    I admire Ian Wishart – the paradise conspiracy is one of the greats of new zealand journalism – maligned nonetheless by many. But even he can or could be taken in. Nicky Hager tried it with stolen information in the hollow men … it just doesnt really work frankly and it must be hard to sleep at night after doing it frankly.

  • Pingback: Jevan Goulter vs Labour | Kiwiblog

  • chuck

    kul­turkampf, I am sure enough of it is true to be of concern. A 14 year old troubled youth should not have been hanging with adults when he should be at school.

  • kulturkampf

    chuck – i understand and appreciate the statement re a 14 year old youth etc etc …. the comment listed above yours gives an interesting aside to the bias (perhaps) given in the post on whales blog. From personal experience – i’ve seen more damage done to the youth of NZ from pastors and elders of christian churches (NON roman catholic in the numerous instances i have seen) and also Scout Masters and sports coaches around this nation and some school teachers (including private school teachers etc) – to start worrying about some privileged grandstander who now cries foul ( the aforegoing is only opinion … not established fact) He may be telling the truth – but he should have gone to the police – not the media. Or is there more to this than meets the eye.

    What do we really want here … to get justice for a person wronged … or stick a pineapple up the ass of a political party we happen to dislike? Isnt life about people – if not we are a sad people and more to be pitied.

  • rrm2

    pfffffft

    Sorry but credibility drops to about zero at right about the point where that **well-known stoner Michael Cullen** supposedly smokes up at a Party Conference.

    This all sounds like sour grapes from a kid who is sore at being dropped from the team due to an inability to handle his piss – and no doubt more serious shortcomings too.

  • kulturkampf

    rrm2 – you summed it up very well.

    Whoever is smoking what – i suspect that the people smoking or imbibing are not the ones being accused in this instance ….

    Perhaps they are just “high on life” from a camp they went to …..

  • chuck

    kul­turkampf,the issue is not just if Barnett was grooming the boy but why he was allowed to do all the things he did and no senior MP put a stop to it quickly. A you person could get to a function and have too much to drink once. DPF mentioned he made a mistake of take a young girl to a National function and not keeping an eye on her. However, even allowing for a fair bit of exaggeration this is not a good look for a party that floated the idea of lowering the age of consent to 12.

  • p1ll

    Ian Wishart embellishes his stories But has facts to back up what he prints.
    Lets see if someone has the Balls to sue him :)

  • jevan

    Attention seeker – I will not deny, Dillusonal – most definitely not – troubled young 14 year old -I would say misled, falsely guided 14 year old, but a liar , no.
    I had this on my chest for a long time, not all of the details of which were revealed however Ian did his job as a journalist and questioned me on all aspects.
    I understand how these things I have said are hard to believe. When we talk about attention seeking let’s put this in perspective. People will form the opinions they want to or what they percieve to be as me however the reality is I have told my story and that is it.
    I am taking a serious stand in running for the Wellington City Council election, you might support me you might not, however as I mention in the story I never expected 1- everybody to believe me 2- to come out at the end looking good or 3- to gain anything personally or politically from this. Great I made a cover of the magazine however open it up and read the content and all it does is make potential voters sceptical. I realized this and what I was doing. I was telling my story and had a fair idea of the reaction I would get.
    I’m a 21 year old , bi sexual , Maori-pacific islander and I went to possibly one of the most right wing journalists to do this. Does that make me look good to my own community, to my gay friends to my Maori friends. No ofcourse not, so when accussing me of being a liaing attention seeking troubled young boy with sour grapes realise what I have had to do and considor in the process well doing this. I have not come out looking great, Probably considored untouchable to some however my story is out and I’m back to running my campaign.
    This site is obviously full of a number of people who do not agree with people like myself when reading the article at the top although that does not deter me.
    I think when reading the article myself, (I was extremely worried with what he was saying about me) I may have been upset the first time however when reading through it again and again I think it has turned out very balance, with the reality being there is a lot of he said – he said and different side disagreeing with each other although I hope to some readers the parts where people have blatently lied is notable and
    obvious. Ian did not right what he thought of the situation he went to them and asked
    for their statements to so it was written fairly
    and although I am not shining like an angel I think a number of the answers are very flaky, questionable and weak which was proven to.

    I will leave you all to make your decisions but there is my 2 cents

    Jevan Goulter

  • rrm2

    Well said Jevan, and good luck with your campaign.

    However I am still struggling a bit with Cullen passing the bong around and Clark coma’d and being carried from the room. Usually anything prefaced with “Leading Journalist Ian Wishart reveals…” generally gets filtered straight to my Propaganda tray. I might remain unconvinced until a few of the other players have had their say thanks.

    Also if “I’m so pretty” is really part of your platform as Aaron & Andy are claiming, that’s fine but you’d better be Mohammed Ali.

    • http://whaleoil.gotcha.co.nz Whaleoil

      The point here which everyone seems to be missing is that Jevan was 14-15 at the time. Put this in another context. A school camp where the teachers get to have a little pet who they ply with booze and drugs and then try to jump. Child Abuse? Of course it is and there would be criminal charges laid. Jevan was a minor then. He was drinking and someone gave him the alcohol and the drugs. Someone let him live life on the large and what 14 y. o. would want to live on the large.

      If it were Nat Mps doing this the howls of outrage from the left would have been deafening. That the left has said NOTHING speaks volumes for their ethics, and their standards. Just compare the attitude of The Standard in the Richard Worth affair, and that was between consenting adults.

      Phil goff was all over that like a fly on shit. Where is he on this?

  • jevan

    I don’t believe I have said anything about vote for me because I’m pretty lol, Lambtom Ward is one of the most politically savvy voting wards in the country and if I wanted to win because I thought I was a “pretty face” then quite frankly
    I would go and stand Porirua.
    In refereneces to Cullen, this was in a backyard style enviroment, outdoors of a pub where there were no media or securtiy other than those at the doors, the actual bar itself was still open but closed and blocked of to the public. In terms of Helen being Coma’d in Premier house she was starting to get drunk, I pressume because she was around friends in her home , when she Started to get drunk she was not carried away however it was obvious people close to her were walking with her away as I guess when you run the country you have to be up in the morning and that would be calling it a night !

    Hope that helps, maybe it does maybe it doesn’t but that’s saying it in plain black and white terms with out all the exahaggeration and embelishment which is starting to form like Chinese whispers

    Jevan Goulter

  • kulturkampf

    Jevan – you went to Ian Wishart and apparently told the truth … there should be no reason for you to now have to defend yourself from the obvious fallout you would have known you would face.

    If the abuse you allege has happened then you should have gone to the police. Why didnt you.

    If you are running for council in Wellington – your grammatical and spelling errors (a la summerheights high) are not standing you in good stead.

    One thing you can be assured of in this instance – is that Whaleoil will defend you (even though he is a rightwing conservative fringe christian) as it suits his political objectives whether you take it up the tailpipe or not. This is prostitution (by the way) of another sort – but ITS still leopards having spots no matter what situation or lapse of time. Its called … “welcome daaahlings .. toooo the neeeewww meeeedia…”

    Go to the police Jevan and get this matter sorted out properly …. not by creepy backstreet abortionists…

  • jevan

    I’m not defending myself, I feel that when I see people who appear to be somewhat intelligent raising questions and with doubts then there is no reason for me not to talk directly.
    Why did I not go to the police, do you know how scary it is sitting in a room with a bunch of people including police officers pushing you to talk and lay charges about something you find embarrasing and humilating to talk about?
    As for the grammar mistakes, forgive me, I am right now posting from my iPhone which makes it a little bit harder.

    I will leave you all to it thou, thank you for hearing me and what I have had to say. I will wait to see what unfolds, the story may grow legs and walk and it may die overnight. I have it out now so it’s in my best interested to get on with my campaign and await to see what happens next.

    Jevan Goulter

  • kulturkampf

    Jevan (the point you miss Whale) is now 20 years old and running for office. He hits the media (just like you do) and now its all hitting the fan. He was 14 or 15 then .. normally from the scanning i have done of your last 3 years of posts you would say to him either STFU or HTFU Whale … or does this lads issue suit your political agenda too well to revert to character. You have used him whale – or have you got a suitably insulting sexual/preference/gender/socio-economic and all the rest of it name for him in the wings too….

    You have no shame

    • http://whaleoil.gotcha.co.nz Whaleoil

      Wrong Culture Struggle, I would not say HTFU or STFU, he was a CHILD. You are simply excusing Labour’s pederast behaviour.

      I couldn’t care a fig what Jevan’s political colours are, or his sexual preferences, if this was Nat MPs I would be calling even harder fro them to cop it. This behaviour no matter which party is despicable.

      Jevan says what he says under his own name, so do I, yet Culture Struggle with the Secret City email address you hide and smear, and excuse appalling behaviour behind the cloak of anonymity.

      I admire Jevan coming forward to tell this story, as he rightly says he has everything to lose, and he is right in that he would be attacked for telling the truth, and he is right in saying it is what it is and who he is and what he has done, he has to live with it and own his own shit, and he is doing that, a pity that Labour thinks they are abovee the law, abovce responsibility and above consequences.

  • kulturkampf

    Jevan … many thanks (and i mean it) for your well put response. I honestly think you should pursue your matters through other channels. This place is a sewer and you shouldnt pursue it here.

    Young man – if you have been wronged – seek redress through channels who wont shamelessly exploit you.

    I wish you well

  • kulturkampf

    Whale you WOULD normally say HTFU and STFU – whale you dish out some appalling things to people – so do you at all wonder about people not wanting to be identified by you … you are a merciless metaphorically murderous person – with no scruples or holds barred … its freely able to be seen in your posts and everything else you do and say. So why would anyone allow you to abuse any openness .. and you DO regularly.

    I also admire Jevan – and i expressed it in the clear – i havent exploited him or otherwise whale. Problem for your conscience … is you HAVE unashamedly.

    Now I want to know whether you will now broaden this discussion to the rest of the broader community who are affected by this post … GLBT is i think … the term used. Will you invite open dialogue.

    Jevan went to the Media – he didnt go to other parties … the question must and SHOULD be asked including by you … WHY??

    Congratulations on deciphering KulturKampf as a concept Whale … and for diligently checking out whether my email address might lead to some avenue of retribution for you to satisfy your more basic urges. I refer to a comment for your enlightenment from a one “megashitstirrer” warning me that you hold grudges and would make my life hell… and i quote.

    I am potentially your best friend ‘whale’ – and not your enemy. You just need to start to understand that fact.

  • kulturkampf

    and i can tell you are upset by all the errors in your typing.

    Breathe deeply – be human

    It helps

  • whalewatcher

    this is real news. Even the allegations are news. If even 5 or 10% true, it shows the Labourites up for perverts and deviants and AMBLA-types that some of them are

    Now, for the truth about Peter Davis’ alleged police-escorted trip back from Hawaii during Mizz Clark’s Prime Ministership… that is a story the public deserves to hear.

  • scanner

    Jevan, a big up for having the nuts to front on this, if it does your campaign for the WCC some good then such is politics, the one point missed in this is that Labour under the two divisive witches specialised in shitting on anyone that got in their way, my how the tables have turned.
    The only sad thing about this is the evil witch shot the gap and isn’t here to run interference and front up on something that may finish up kneecapping the rats.
    Last time I looked grooming children for sex was against the law, as is supplying liquor to a minor, we can all look forward to the upcoming police investigation

  • kulturkampf

    Whale watcher .. tell us – honestly – if there is perversion and corruption that is provable we all want to hear – this is sincerely expressed.

    Can you give the details please – in the public domain.

  • gaskranken

    Everyone calm down I know Jevan and he’s all shit…Never put him in charge of any part of the public purse. Jevan will run you over budget and all you will get for your money is a whole lot of pissed giggling gay boys with iPhones. If you really want to know a little more about Jevan and his past google the name Konrad Kahuroa that would be a good start.

  • kulturkampf

    Thanks gaskranken … all anyone needs is the facts (assuming what you say is true)

    Just i thought that Whale was the arbiter of all that was right, true and etc etc

    Guess not

  • steve

    Lefties are alive and well here today, like blowflies lol

  • kulturkampf

    and de shit has done arrived fo de blowwies to alight on bro!!! Whooo de whiff is over powerin bro….

    Dat rightie whitie bullshit done always attracted de blowflies .. dey marry deeear cousinsand play de banjoes on de porch saah…. yaaasuh … dey weeear de whaate hoods and burn de crosses dem righties yeeah … dey de whale ku klux klan dey is … yaaas suuuh!

    When de nex cross burnin o mightttty whaaaale – great peniscular development of de holy saga of a de christian episcopal adventist purist two faced gospel saah ameen
    OOOH jeeesus fuk de fags and preserve de tru people who dishonor udders and accuse udders falsely … we be de tru servants o de livin god … aaaaamen
    Steve be de good disciple… yassuh

  • grizz

    Thank you Jevan for fronting. Kudos to you. However, I have a lot of reservations about all these allegations. I am not a Labour person and would have loved to see them flush their heads down a toilet. But, I look at what you have said and cannot help thinking that this has been a load of half truths, fabrications and misrepresentations of the true story. It is hard to look at this with any credibility. I really disagreed with Michael Cullen’s policies, but I cannot see him puffing on the dac. He was far to stiff for this, hence why he lasted for 9 years as a finance minister. I really struggle to believe that you would have free reign around ministers’ homes and rubbing shoulders with the political elite during garden parties at Premiere house. Clarke and the Tizz having lesbian affairs, while the jury may still be out, your fantasy is as good as mine.

    That said, If it is true, It bothers me that Government Ministers allowed you to be truant from school and as a 14, 15 year old plied you with alcohol and used you as a play thing. It seems far fetched that you may have been statutorily raped by Ministerial troughers.

    In conclusion I look into this, and think something may have happened, but nothing nearly as sensational as written in this article. That said, I do question the ethic of some Labour MPs at the time. I feel that you have been deprived of finishing your education. If you did have problems at the time, I really hope efforts were made at the time to address them as now at the age of 21 you will be a better person for it.

  • kulturkampf

    Grizz – sincerely …this comment from you is the most openminded thing ive seen on this wasteland.

    You arent gay are you….. cos whale would fukin deal to you if you were a fuking fag you know … he may be tolerant .(yeah right to quote Tui billboard) .. but hes a fucking christian and you know what that means … “burn the witch” (witch is proved innocent) “whale considers his sale of angry mob materials to the mob at huge profits under National policy” Mob says “burn the witch” Whale says “but shes innocent” (knowing he has primed the mob) and the mob says “so fucking what … burn her anyway”… you get my drift im sure

    I think you get my point … and if you dont … really who gives a shit …

  • kulturkampf

    Whale – in all honesty … you arent getting secretly excited or tittilated by all this scandal are you. There are therapists and you can play dressups if you really feel you need to.

  • grizz

    Culture Struggle, you are sooo cliche’d. If you do not like a Christian’s opinion, you attack and criticise them for being a Christian. I really think you have misunderstood the point that Whale is trying to make. It relates to an ethic that Government MPs can take a child out of school, ply them with alcohol and use him as their play thing.

    FYI. I am not gay and I do not go to church. I hate people who bullshit, spew out half truths and go on about some fantastical misinterpretations of the truth. Labour polititians have been doing it since Labour politicians were invented. Unfortunately for the same reason I stuggle to take everything that Craig Wishart writes seriously. Likewise I think this Jevan character is a little theatrical. Nonetheless, his antics are not helped by being groomed in a false and purile environment and it would seem that certain ex-government MPs have some explaining to do here.

    In no way is your rant on your belief on Christains believing they are holier than thou is helpful. It is at the same level of fantasy that I would expect from the likes of Tigerpig and that failed dental nurse who’s name eludes me.

  • kulturkampf

    Classic over reaction grizz … i think you need to re – read what whale has said and what Jevan has said … why is the word “rant” used so freely on this site??

    If a christian states they are a christian and uses that belief paradigm as a basis for comment .. ie Whale believes the entire resources of the world are his to use till exhaustion … and other tenets of that faith … then that is fair game as a point of reference for judgement of same… just as the Christian uses their paradigm to judge those outside the ‘pale’ of their belief system… (as yet unspecified).

    Frankly Grizz – I think there is a freight train and more of things unexplained by Whaleoil about his beliefs and how they mould his approach to life. Grizz – some muslims in fact many … regard you and i as infidels and unbelievers .. now .. how do fully believing christians view non believers…

    Also – with regard to the young man in question who says he is bi sexual … how does Whales church and whale view him and his life practice … what is the answer….

    That should bring matters to the boil i think…

    I have noticed Grizz – that people on this blog dont understand what “rant” means. What they really mean .. is a series of words that challenge them and they dont wish to confront the reality of same (not all the time .. but most often).

  • kulturkampf

    And why use this term of insult “tigerpig” for an elected person in our democracy .. ask yourself grizz .. would you be man enough to use that insult to the mans face in person …

    • http://whaleoil.gotcha.co.nz Whaleoil

      yes I would, Mallard is a cunt and I’ve already told that to his whiny ass face.

  • grizz

    Struggler, you are right. It is not an insult I would use to his face. I would actually use the insult “Mega Shitstirring Bullshitter” I can see through him like he has a hole in his head. I could not care who he roots.

    Quite frankly, I think you have lost your rocker. It is you who is turning this into a religious debate or a debate on sexual orientation. Realistically this is a case about a set of values that an ordered civilisation should observe and that leaders of such a civilisation appear to have transgressed. As I have said before, there is a lot of Bullshit Baffling the truth so you cannot believe all that is alleged.

    But quite frankly I do not give a fuck about how Whale’s Christian beliefs affect his way of thinking. I can make up my own mind. While I may share some common ground I can and do disagree with Whale on many things. However I think you start to believe your own bullshit when you attack Whale because of his religion. You are just transgressing from the real issue here.

    How does the Muslim and Christian world view me…. well I currently have 3 fatwas on my head, if they want to villify me some more, they should get in line because it stretches around the corner.

  • kulturkampf

    our beliefs .. and our paradigms affect who we are …. i am always concerned when people who either exercise or try to exercise any sort of power wont spell out their belief system that motivates them.

    I think Grizz that you are a good guy … oddly i think Whale is a good person … but .. i think we all need to be accorded the courtesy of knowing who we are actually dealing with. Whale … the national party dilletante … or perhaps…. whale the christian 7th day adventist who may have certain peccadilloes that affect his world view.

    Look – i m a person who opposes muslim and Asian lnfluence on our culture due to PC attitudes enshrined in PC legislation.

    I want to know who i am dealing with.

    With this young man in question down south .. i dont think anyone knows who they are dealing with … including ian wishart.

    Whales belief system is important .. if he states it clearly then it creates a clear set of parameters.

    • http://whaleoil.gotcha.co.nz Whaleoil

      Couldn’t stay away could you gary? Idiot.

  • todd

    kul­turkampf you seem to know clearly Whales belief system, judging by what you have been stating.

    As it is on this issue, religion may be irrelevant because whether he is a homophobe as the young age of Jevan is what whale is mentioning as the problem.
    I do agree with your point early though about Jevans motives in approaching the media first.

    I do wonder how he can think he is ready to run for public office though if he hasn’t laid a formal complaint. It is understandable not to at a young age but NZ law does seem to accomodate historical claims.

  • bigkev

    agreed, garrys back

  • inventory2

    kulturkampf said “And why use this term of insult “tiger­pig” for an elected per­son in our democ­racy .. ask your­self grizz .. would you be man enough to use that insult to the mans face in person …”

    That’s rather ironic kk, when Mallard (the “elected person in our democracy” to whom you refer) regularly calls the PM “smile and wave” on Red Alert. He can’t even get the nickname gramatically correct (it should be Smile and Wave – in title case), which is worrying for the man who would be Minister of Education.

  • michaels

    Todd = Garry?
    kul­turkampf = Harp-on??

    They both spout the same shit.

  • michaels

    Todd = Garry?
    kul­turkampf = Harp-on?

    They both spout the same shit.

  • panda

    Whalewatcher comments – “Now, for the truth about Peter Davis’ alleged police-escorted trip back from Hawaii dur­ing Mizz Clark’s Prime Min­is­ter­ship… that is a story the pub­lic deserves to hear”.

    Funny that, a few years back I was told a story that fits in with the above comment. It was not idle pub talk, but from a former law enforcement person (who’s office was on the top floor).

  • michaels

    I can’t help but ask, why has Farrar not touched this??

  • hagues

    michaels “I can’t help but ask, why has Far­rar not touched this??”

    He has, basically he doesn’t believe the guy…

    http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2010/04/jevan_goulter_vs_labour.html

  • michaels

    Ahhh yes, that he did hagues.
    I must have missed it during my snooze whilst scrolling :)

  • chuck

    “He has, basi­cally he doesn’t believe the guy…”

    I did not read it that way. He does not accept that
    Barnett was grooming him or made any sort of attempt to have sex with him. However, he accepts that Javan had support for other parts of his story.

    David thought Barnett was committed to his partner. I have heard a lot of rumours about Barnett – one of them very credible.

  • chuck

    Javan, I take sex with a minor very seriously. If someone is over 21 and they have sex with someone under 16 I view that very seriously. If the younger person is sexually experienced that does not make it acceptable. If the person is considerably over 21 and uses their position as a lure that makes things worse.

    I would like to speak to you on a related matter.

    My email is chuckbirdnz@gmail.com if you would like to speak to me.

    Kind regards and good luck
    Chuck

  • chuck

    I am not surprised about the biased MSM not taking notice of this story.

    They were invited to a talk by Prof Bob Carter who has just launched a book in Wellington.

    His book is counter to the ETS scam. No one from the mSM showed up.

  • statlerandwaldorf

    Wishart’s investigations into Benson-Pope a few years back also discovered that Tim Barnett and Chris Carter both attend organized, invitation-only homosexual orgies in Christchurch and Auckland respectively.

    So much for the pretense that their relationships are monogamous.

  • hagues

    chuck “I did not read it that way. He does not accept that
    Bar­nett was groom­ing him or made any sort of attempt to have sex with him. How­ever, he accepts that Javan had sup­port for other parts of his story.”

    I was taking my point from this comment “So overall I find the allegations lacking in credibility in significant areas. Having said that though, I think there are some lessons for Labour in the perils of letting a 14 year old run riot through Parliament and the party”

    So yes whilst DPF does believe the main outline of the story (14 year old running around parliament), he doesn’t believe the main allegations. But anyways, thats just one man’s take on it.

  • chuck

    statlerand­wal­dorf, I have stories about Barnett but not Carter. I read all Ian had to say about Benson-Pope but cannot recall Ian mentioning anything about Barnett or Carter. As I said I heard a few stories about Barnett but I do not think it was in Investigate.

  • chuck

    hagues, even Wishart is not claiming Javan’s claims about Barnett trying groom him or something similar are true. However, it seems DPF believes that Labour MPs acted quite inappropriately towards a 14 year old and others turned a blind eye to this.

    I am a member of the ACT party. I do not hold a position but if I was at a function and seen an adult brought a 14 year old who was not his or her child and allowed him or her to drink I would have said something.

    This is not a good look for Labour who have some odd ideas about children’s rights and parental authority.

  • statlerandwaldorf

    chuck,

    The references were made in Ian Wishart’s online only revelations into Benson-Pope’s involvement in the Dunedin BDSM scene.

    http://briefingroom.typepad.com/the_briefing_room/2006/11/the_secret_life.html

    The link to the original PPV online article is dead though.

  • inventory2

    How long ago was it that Phil Goff broadly floated the idea of lowering the age of consent to 12?

  • gaskranken

    So not sure how many of you googled Konrad but here’s a link http://www.qna.net.nz/news/677.html

    Now if Jevan had any balls he would name the rich gay Auckland businessman who raped Konrad after all he knows who he is…eh Jevan?

    I’m sure Aunty Paula would be keen to talk to him about his double dipping last year eh Jevan?

  • chuck

    statlerand­wal­dorf, thanks for that. I managed to find the file. I forgot about about Bar­nett and Carter in the article. Have you still got the article.

  • chuck

    “How long ago was it that Phil Goff broadly floated the idea of low­er­ing the age of con­sent to 12?”

    He floated the idea in 2004. Surprisingly, there was some support as there was to be a 2 year maximum age gap. Even with that the idea was flaky especially when combined with other laws that undermine parental authority.

    This is another reason not to have Labour in again even though National is just marginally better.

  • spanishbride

    I believe that kulturecamp is that Gary guy too.
    He is getting longer and longer in his replies and obviously couldn’t stay away from the ‘sewer” as he calls it.

  • jevan

    To Gaskranken,

    I am a little upset that you feel the need to bring an unrelated issue regarding my late friend who is no longer with us into this discussion, I think that is absolutely distgusting and irrelevant however I guess you will try and throw as much mud at me whereever you can find it.

    In regards to naming this rich business man in Auckland, it is of no secret who this person was, and he is still looking over his shoulder today. Kudos to you for trying to find something to smack me in the face with but I suggest in future you do a little bit more homework.

    In regards to an earlier post where I ran an event and took all the money, I suggest before saying that “I did that” when you can not recall correctly the event or scenario maybe you should research that a little better as well ! If you do this you will see I submitted accounts and reports online for all to see and it was blatently obvious and clear that no body had been ripped off.

    Thanks

    RIP Konrad Kahuroa

    Yours Truly

  • tommyteflon

    Jevan,

    My advice to you would be do not run for a council seat just yet. At least not until you can sit down with the police and put together a statement. You know deep down that you must do this, so don’t hide behind your goals and dreams). Criminal charges obviously need to be laid for the offences that took place. You were a child at the time, an unaccompanied minor.
    Once you have removed this giant obstacle you will find the way forward is far less daunting.
    Good luck
    Tom Bailey

  • gaskranken

    To Jevan

    When you stand for public office Jevan nothing in your past is off limits you will learn that the hard way but then you prefer the hard way eh Jevan?

    So you know this rich white faggot rapist’s name but I don’t so come on Jevan show some balls name him for us.

    You were double dipping last year when you were working full time at the fringe bar and collecting the unemployment benefit at the same time eh Jevan?

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_QHPFJEIC5X2KPCCOHPY4NITHJI R

    this story needs to be pushed out there again, now more than ever.

  • Shadrach

    There was a certain young man from a dysfunctional background, subsequently a prominent MP, who possibly had a questionable relationship with some National politicians some decades ago.