Peter Goodfellow and the Strategic Seats

Peter Goodfellow - idiot presidentAs the focus of caucus shifts from the failure of trying to strong-arm Alan Towers from the board elections to putting pressure on Roger Bridge (Yes I’m very well informed, thank you). Senior Ministers are whispering now that Roger will be standing down, leaving just three candidates for the three positions. If Roger stands firm then they will move onto Malcolm Plimmer.

One has to ask why it is that a faction within caucus are hell bent on have a lazy, pontificating twat as president and why they are meddling in party business? Do they want this blogger to start to focus on their performance as MPs and Ministers?

Now I’ve bagged Andrew “Three Hats” Little off and on for years, and a fair bit since he became Labour Party President. Even though I have bagged him I have to say he has a points victory over Peter Goodfellow because he has actually got around to doing something in the seats Labour wants to win.

Labour had early selection in Auckland Central, Waitakere, Maungakiekie, Ohariu and West Coast. There are five Labour list MPs of varying levels of ability out there working in the electorates they want to win. “Gladys” Chauvel is working his guts out in Ohariu where he might just win if National don’t kneecap Dunne and turn it into a blue seat. Damien O’Connor is a good bloke (wrong party) with plenty of time to win a seat he had held for years. “My Little Pony” Ardern is Labour’s pick to win back a seat that means more to them than just about any other, Auckland Central. The best that can be said about the other two is, in the immortal words of Murray Ball “God, he loves a trier”.

Fair play to Andrew “Three Hats” Little. He has seen something needed to be done and done it. Compare that to Peter Goodfellow. He has done nothing. Nothing at all. Our MPs in marginal seats have had absolutely no support from the party, and nothing seems likely if Peter stays president.

Think about that Paula, Nicky, Sam, Katrina & Chris. Think about what could have happened, and what has happened, and if you personally would be better off with a change in president. Add Nathan Guy and Gerry Brownlee to that list because they are the most vocal supporters of Peter Goodfellow right now.

Call to Action for vot­ing delegates:

  • Rank Peter Good­fel­low Last
  • Pun­ish him for his record of doing nothing
  • Get a new Pres­i­dent, and see the National Party thrive
  • http://www.blairmulholland.co.nz BlairM

    I find myself more and more appalled at this National Government. When I think about the terrible things I said about the last (’97-’99) National Government, and how limp-wristed I thought they were, and how much I cheered when Helen Clark cleaned their clocks I am ashamed. They were not that bad. I even want Wyatt Creech back.

    So glad I am not living in NZ right now. What do these National MPs stand for? Right now I have no idea.

  • toby

    What specifically are you talking about?

  • megashitstirrer

    I dont know what you are on abour WO. Peter Goodfellow seems a perfectly likeable gent to me. If he is useless but has money and funds the party coffers what more do you want in a president?

    • http://whaleoil.gotcha.co.nz Whaleoil

      If he dipped into his own pocket that would at least be a start, but he won’t even pay for a lunch at a conference, that makes him worse than useless. It makes him tight-fisted, cheap and useless.

  • mediatart

    Goodfellow getting a free lunch was only following the steps of the smiley leader who stiffed the taxpayers for a $9 hamburger meal at Burger King on his credit card- no proper reciept either. And this is when he ‘knew’ the card was for for official purposes only.
    THis was common with Nationals ministers. Lunch for themselves is some how the taxpayers responsibility, when of course they get an allowance as a MP for such sundries, no reciepts required

  • megashitstirrer

    When your father was president it was different aye? Oh yes, its always better back then.