Why disarming a population is evil

xperts-agree-on-gun-controlThere is talk once again about banning this and banning that because some criminal arse has used some weapon to commit a crime. The simple fact is this, a ban only disarms the innocent, the criminals remain armed. Once disarmed there is little you can do to resist, criminals or thieves or an out of control government.

Gun Control should mean only one thing, hitting what you aim for.

Join an organisation, resist bans. Ask the government to police criminals not the innocent.

National Shooters Association

NRA

Council of Licensed Firearms Owners

National Rifle Association of New Zealand

Sporting Shooters Association of New Zealand

New Zealand Antique and Historical Arms Association

New Zealand Deerstalkers

Pistol NZ

New Zealand Service Rifle Association

International Military Arms Society

Tagged:
  • spiker

    Best bang for buck is the National Shooters Association. Founder Richard Lincoln recently took the Police to court and won over their misguided policy decision to reclassify A category semiautomatic firearms. Other orgs just advised how to meekly comply.

    http://www.nsanz.org.nz/

  • jaghut

    New Zealand current firearm laws work well, as shown by its incredibly low rate of gun crime.
    I don’t see any reason to change the status quo.

  • kehua

    How many people killed by drunks again? Nah to hard, let`s pick on guns. Fuckwits.

  • grantman

    Couldn’t agree more. Go for the NSA headed by Richard Lincoln, they actually stood up and did something. Without them firearms owners like myself would be stuck under an illegal re-interpretation of the arms law.