Anatomy of a failed leak, coup, smear

Ok it has taken me almost a week from the first contact to today to piece together a time line of a clever, but not so clever attempt to manipulate, bloggers, media and the ACT party into achieve the aims of a rogue staffer.

The reason I am posting these details is because I am really very angry at the attempt to use me to orchestrate a political outcome within a party.

There is a great deal of muck flying around and some of the documents I have been leaked have also been leaked to other media sources.

On Tuesday after Roy’s reverse coup and set up had failed my inbox  was alight with rumours, innuendo and in particular emails from two anonymous email addresses who attached various documents.

Those two emails were kiaoracuzzy@gmail.com and TMO’s Call <over1013hpa@hotmail.com>. At the stage I received the emails I had no idea who they came from but the documents attached were supposed to leave me with the impression that Rodney Hide was a huge bully and that somehow Heather Roy was being treated appallingly, along with the impression that a good mate of mine was involved with leaking classified documents to other bloggers.  However after I smelled a rat and declined to publish the documents I sought and gained an interview with Rodney Hide.

It is now that I can piece together a rather strange sequence of events, emails, phone conversations and documents that show the real story of the failed leak-gate that was supposed to take out Wayne Mapp, Rodney Hide and various other ACT staffers and members.

For the record I don’t think Heather Roy is responsible for all of this, however she must be accountable because it was done in her name.

Email from first leaker

Email from first leaker

I received the above email in response to an earlier solicitation by “Kiaora Cuzzy”, where they accused me of being a “Hide lover”. I replied that based on the information I had thus far I was pretty disappointed in Rodney Hide and then this email arrived. It contained the Version 3 document that has subsequently been posted on the NZ Herald website.

Earlier I had received another anonymous email and from the content thought I knew who had sent it and so replied attaching this document for comment. Depending on the comments received I would decide whether or not it was authentic.

Email from not so anonymous emailer

Email from not so anonymous emailer

Here we have confirmation that one of my anonymous emailers is named Simon. Also that the document in question that has been leaked, not just to me but to other bloggers and to media is authentic. Note too that “Simon has also sent me a separate version.

That email contained some personal notes that are highly defamatory to the individuals named. I have spoken to each of these individuals and though they acknowledge the defamatory nature of them they think it is important for the context of the allegations to be known. They know who has made these comments as you are about find out. But before I show that email this is the one I received from “Simon” or the stage I received this the anonymous TMO’s Call. you will note that the details are strikingly similar to the powerpoint presentation published by the Herald some three days later. I received this email on the Monday before the ACT caucus had even met.

Email received by Whaleoil on Monday 16 August 2010

Email received by Whaleoil on Monday 16 August 2010

So, at that stage I was still in the dark. Then I received this email.

Confirmation of identity of TMO's Call

Confirmation of identity of TMO's Call

This was in response to my email asking for clarification on some of the details in the longer one previously. TMO’s Call has signed off his email as SEJ. SEJ are the intials of Simon Ewing-Jarvie and he is telling me that he amd Heather Roy are working together on the documents to be presented to ACT’s caucus Tuesday.

The next email I received from TMO’s Call contained a great deal more information, and almost all of it actionable.

Email from TMO's call with draft of Roy presentation

Email from TMO's call with draft of Roy presentation

TMO’s Call, again signed off this email as Simon. I refuse to publish the “Interesting Questions to ask” document and the “True Facts” document is an earlier draft of the document leaked to me minutes later by “Kiaora Cuzzy“.

What we have here is a deliberate attempt to create a story via the blogosphere and via the news media by a staffer of a Minister. This whole ACT saga appears to be nothing more than a staffer capturing utterly a Minister and then running some sort of paranoid end game to unseat leaders and ministers. The reason I am posting these emails and documents is that both Heather Roy and Simon Ewing-Jarvie are refuting any charge of leaking these documents yet as you can see they are both complicit in leaking them. If they sent them to me, they sent them to others.

I have also been lied to, and I do not take kindly to those who lie.

I spent some time this afternoon with Rodney Hide in an attempt to get his side of the story and to provide some context for the apparently damaging documents leaked by “Simon” and “SEJ”. What I can now say is that from all of my information that I have gathered, including a conversation with Nick Kearney this afternoon, Rodney Hide has acted in a manner appropriate to the situation. Given that I have now learned that Simon Ewing-jarvie, has never had, and never will get SIS clearance it seems remarkable that he was allowed to so utterly influence a Minister. I have had confirmation from other sources that Simon Ewing-Jarvie was marched from the parliamentary precinct and has indeed had all access, oral, written or otherwise revoke immediately. This person has attempted to hoodwink a great many people, including me, other media and unfortunately has hoodwinked the Labour Party as well.

To use his own handle it’s now the “TMO’s Call“. I’m pretty certain the result will be No Try. Kiaora Cuzzy remain anonymous, but given the close circle of those with access to the documents it can only be one of about 5 people.

After spending nearly a week on this, I can say without any hesitation that Rodney Hide has acted with the utmost integrity in dealing with this essentially rogue staffer.

  • jaghut

    A pity this had to happen, I liked Heather Roy.
    Of course the MSM will be a long time in publishing this, if at all.

    • berend

      I got her press releases. Being likable and getting things done ACT voters would like to say are two different things.

  • Pingback: Tweets that mention Anatomy of a failed leak, coup, smear -- Topsy.com

  • mediatart

    This is too funny.
    So Rodders is a little angel…… first it was his wife who was the harridan, while Rodders just happened to find solace in the …arms of a much younger woman.
    Now its a long time colleague who is the shrew, because there is no…evidence.
    What do you expect youtube vids.??
    Good on you for sticking up for your mate but believe for a minute we can believe a shred of what you are saying. Its obviously part of the Hide – I know nothing- attempt to spin furiously ‘hiding’ behind others.
    All you VRWC bloggers are ‘singing in unison’, is no surprise.
    Its not the end , but its certainly the beginning of the end for the Douglas- Prebble cuckoo in Nationals nest.

    In politics as you have said many times , explaining is losing.

    Get on with your life instead backing these losers

    • todd

      There is little evidence to argue from either side but I can clearly see that there’s an agenda at play and the people who stand to gain the most are the victims mentioned in the leaks.
      So unlike puppets like you I am more inclined to question than I am to blindly follow and so far Cam has at least shown clear reasoning to his conclusion.

      In the end though you probably take the word of climate “scientists” and believe there is a consipiracy at play by the National party.

  • Pingback: A must read | Kiwiblog

  • bartclache

    “Kiaora Cuzzy remain anony­mous, but given the close cir­cle of those with access to the doc­u­ments it can only be one of about 5 people.”

    You can be anonymous to an extent. If you mine into an email’s metadata, you can usually get a pretty reasonable idea about where it came from. At the very least, you can determine the service provider.

    In gmail you can click “show original” from the drop down menu beside “reply” and you (usually) get an ip address.

  • clintheine

    Fuck Whale, you are worth a thousand times your weight in gold. I am looking forward to getting apologies from all the fucktards who jumped to conclusions about Rodney and the ACT Party and who decided to spam me continuously all week with abuse and scorn for backing Rodney.

    I won’t get any of course but I don’t give a shit. I knew we’d all be vindicated and I don’t know what that idiot Simon would even try and think you’d be “onside”. He’s always been a prize prick.