17

No way, John, no f*cking way

by Whaleoil on August 6, 2010

Nasty Helen Clark, face of deathThe Herald reports (print only, Business Herald page 27) that traitor Key has ordered MFAT to begin preparations for a diplomatic campaign to back Helen Clark for UN Secretary General.  The paper says the traitor Key is facing opposition from his cabinet colleagues but is determined to get Clark into the world’s top diplomatic job.

Whaleoil couldn’t believe this was true, so he checked with his mate Alf Grumble who has close links with the government, MFAT and the Wellington lobbying community – but Alf says it’s not only true but more advanced than the Herald knows.

So it has come to this – not only is the traitor Key content with keeping in place all Clark’s pet programmes (Working for Families, KiwiSaver, the Cullen Fund, interest-free student loans, the Employment Relations Act) he is now going to grant her her heart’s desire and try to make her head of the UN.

Does anyone in the Cabinet have the balls to stop him?

It is the duty of every loyal Kiwi to see this stopped.

Helen Clark should be arrested and prosecuted for the death of our first soldier in Afghanistan for allowing our troops to be sent there with no more protection than a Toyota Hi-Lux. She should not even be able to contemplate even attempting to be Ban Ki Moon’s successor.

Tagged: • • • • • • •

Related posts

  • michaels

    I said Key would lose my vote by not changing the Bradford bill.
    I said Key will lose my vote if he brings in an ETS.

    If Key supports this then I will not even consider a vote for him again.
    Rodders, your it from then.here on in.

  • Pingback: Having Helen Clark work in New York is one thing – having her run the world from there is another « Alf Grumble

  • grizz

    The Mafioso had different ways of keeping their enemies silent. Giving her a bullshit job in the USA at least keeps her out of harms way in NZ, legally speaking. Besides, I am sure Key looks forward to more text messages out of New York.

    I am sure Ban Ki Moon had political enemies advocating for him as well!

  • http://www.blairmulholland.co.nz BlairM

    It’s called “exile”. Run with it.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1201173949 petal

    michaels, you’re an idiot.

    I know I should attack the message and not the messenger, but if you can’t see the idiocy of your position, you are beyond help.

    Mind you, I was you some time ago. But voting ACT twice got me 6 more years of a corrupt Labour party. I woke up. At least 3 years too late.

    I’m sorry you don’t like some of the National Party policies, directions and decisions. I’m not too keen either. But the alternatives are worse.

    So grab your toys and climb back into the cot for a think.

    National is the best we can do. It’s not pretty, but the alternatives, all of them, are worse.

  • clintheine

    Petal, errr, you’re having a laugh right? National is NOT the best we can do. Those idiots voted against BULK FUNDING this week and still lend support to most of Helens flagship policies. You must be choking on all the dead rats you have swallowed since Key won the last election.

    Voting ACT did nothing of the sort for why Labour won the last 2 elections, that was down to National being shit (before Brash was leader) and then down to Labours election spending. You woke up but you hit your head on the way out of bed because no ACT supporter would pedal backwards to National unless they were already harbouring softcock left wing tendencies.

    Voting ACT will give National its balls back. Todays National Party is lost, helpless and run by a guy who loves Helen Clark.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1201173949 petal

    Clint, politics is compromise. In my perfect world, we would be living in a Libertarian society.

    I think you have a selective memory about the Brash election. I felt very much that had National had a few more votes that had been sent to ACT, it could have made it into Government 3 years earlier. ACT had been pushing hard to be a coalition partner to keep National honest, and I fell for that. What I forgot is that a coalition partner in opposition is impotent and a waste of another 3 years.

    It is better to have any government that does not have Labour. It is better to have any National Government. It is better to have a National and ACT government. But would I risk National opposition to keep ACT in play? Not any longer.

    ACT have a great manifesto, but terrible personnel at parliamentary and hustings levels. The examples are numerous and embarrassingly public.

    To me a vote for National was a vote to get rid of Labour. Next time, my vote will be for National to ensure Labour doesn’t return. Pragmatism. Compromise.

    Time will also put to the rot into National though. Everything goes in cycles. The voting public is too stupid to realise that we give Labour a hard-won healthy economy that is fixed by National hard decisions, and Labour then get to hollow out the pumpkin again to be turfed out for National to fix things again. It’s painful to watch.

    But then you and I do not represent the typical voter.

    And in your case, you may think I am a typical voter :)

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1201173949 petal

    “Voting ACT will give National its balls back. Todays National Party is lost, helpless and run by a guy who loves Helen Clark.”

    Do you really believe that? Really?

    Do you not see that Key and/or the strategy team realised that 1) you can’t do anything from opposition benches, 2) don’t scare the horses, 3) it takes time to build trust, 4) introduce change slowly, 5) don’t stand on principle when it’s about the small stuff

    I despise some of the National decisions made to date. But not as much as I would have despised Labour’s.

    Perhaps I am wrong. But I think Key and the strategists have a 9 year or 12 year plan, and not just a 3 year one. And in that plan, the first 3 years are going just peachy.

    Just look at the electorate rating National’s performance to date.

    Never going to make you or I or any other ACT supporter happy. But then nothing much we will get from ANY government will unless libertarianism is embraced by 30% or more of the population.

    • kapow

      Petal, a vote for the right is a vote for the right.
      If enough of us National voters who are sick to the stomach of Key’s progressive veiwpoint and pathetic sucking up to the left, actually voted for ACT maybe we would get more policy that we agree with.
      We did not vote for what Key is doing, we voted for a move away from the failure of the last decade.
      And now having him support the great evil bitch to further her evil empire just leaves me completely astounded.

  • clintheine

    Put it this way, if we had 10 ACT MPs (or more) then we’d have a lot more certainty.

    I remember back when the Nats were glad to have ACT there, as it meant 2 parties were pushing the good message out there. Now the Nats are getting all precious and feel “attacked” by ACT and want to push their idea of centre right policy. The problem is, it isn’t remotely close to right wing and seems mostly more in line with what we had under 9 years of Labour. Helen didn’t care about scaring the horses, she did 3 terms of whatever she wanted and achieved a lot. I give this National team 2 terms and they may scrape a 3rd term. But why bother? I’d rather a one term policy and culture changing Government than 9 lumbering years of nothing.

    I’d rather make it as difficult as hell for Labour to reverse our policies. At the moment, it would take them 90 days to wipe out the National initiatives and they will be free to start again.

  • kehua

    Fuck Clark and anyone that helps the bitch. National knows well that most Kiwis don`t want a bar of Goff and Labour, it seems a case of “we are bad but not as bad as Labour“ so vote for us. No way Johnboy[ for that is what you are looking like politically] Act will get the whanau vote from my lot reluctantly because I never believed i would vote for anything connected to Douglas. The arrogance of National is only superceeded by this `legislate from the hip“ bullshit. I was admiring of the first 100 days but since then Hello…………….

  • stanace

    John Key knows what he is doing. Support Clarkes application, he knows she won’t get the job. And then keep telling Labour in the House what a fine fellow he is, it should be fun to watch.

  • scanner

    The jobs hers, turd all ways seem to float on the top of the pond, give her the job at least it keeps the interfering witch on the other side of the world.

  • granny

    Fact is that unless Mr Moon is seriously offside with the Security Council, or quits, he will be reappointed through to 2017.

    Far more likely is that MFAT are after a seat on the Security Council in 2014 – and that isn’t going to happen if Heather Simpson is running the Secretariat from 2012.

  • mediatart

    Thats got the battery hens all clucking.
    Thats what happens when theres too many hens a not enough roosters

  • dion

    At least it’ll keep her out of the country.

  • kehua

    Clarke gets the UN = Key gets World Bank ?????????????????