from Boing Boing
Five South Dakota lawmakers have introduced legislation that would require any adult 21 or older to buy a firearm â€śsufficient to provide for their ordinary self-defense.â€ť
The bill, which would take effect Jan. 1, 2012, would give people six months to acquire a firearm after turning 21. The provision does not apply to people who are barred from owning a firearm.
Nor does the measure specify what type of firearm. Instead, residents would pick one â€śsuitable to their temperament, physical capacity, and preference.â€ť
The measure is known as an act â€śto provide for an individual mandate to adult citizens to provide for the self defense of themselves and others.â€ť
Rep. Hal Wick, R-Sioux Falls, is sponsoring the bill and knows it will be killed. But he said he is introducing it to prove a point that the federal health care reform mandate passed last year is unconstitutional.
â€śDo I or the other cosponsors believe that the State of South Dakota can require citizens to buy firearms? Of course not. But at the same time, we do not believe the federal government can order every citizen to buy health insurance,â€ť he said.
Judge Roger Vinson of Federal District Court in Pensacola, Fla., concluded that the insurance requirement was so â€śinextricably boundâ€ť to other provisions of the Affordable Care Act that its unconstitutionality required the invalidation of the entire law.
â€śThe act, like a defectively designed watch, needs to be redesigned and reconstructed by the watchmaker,â€ť Judge Vinson wrote.