Have the Labour Party given up completely? Are they really behind their leader or are they just pretending they are until the election is over? It would appear so.
On First Line (TV3â€™s breakfast news show)Â Duncan Garner said that he spoke to a senior MP about the Goff/Hughes debacle and whether or not there would be a leadership coup.
What was the senior Labour MPâ€™s response?Â â€śPhil can take the bullet for this in the 2011 election.â€ť (So much for everyone being behind him)
Wow! What a bunch of gutless wonders.
They are completely failing at their job as an opposition and are not even trying anymore.
What kind of defeatist attitude is this? Why would anyone want to vote for a party that has given up, let alone with such a crap leader.
The whole caucus are a bunch of wimps. They have a chance to roll Goff and try and claw back some credibility and yet they are too gutless to do so.Â It is time that they grew some balls and did what was necessary to show they can one day govern again.Â If the last two weeks are anything to go by, we will have a National-led government (no matter how incompetent it may become) for a long time. Phil needs to quit, or the gutless wonders of the Labour caucus need to push him now.
To just sit back and lose the election, saying â€śPhil can take the bullet for this in the 2011 electionâ€ť is a cop-out of the biggest kind.
It would appear that despite trying to say they are all united behind Phil Goff they arenâ€™t. What they are really united about is losing the election and letting Phil take the fall for it. In a way this is more ruthless than a coup because Phil will forever be remembered as the Labour leader that lead Labour to an embarrassing defeat rather than a Labour Minister who served the Labour party for over 30 years. His legacy will be to be known as Phil â€śthe fill-inâ€ť Goff who was destined to lose from the beginning.