Labour's campaign?

As everyone in politics is aware no one knows what Labour stand for, and they need simple messages that appeal to the average New Zealand voter. In the interests of helping further democracy I am prepared to help Labour, especially with some policy ideas to fill the current void.

Labour should be running aggressively with the line “Are you better off now than you were under Labour?”. The answer to this is almost certainly no, though this has little to do with National being in power and a lot to do with the world financial crisis. The rationale doesn’t matter much, just that people don’t feel as well off as they did previously.

This is the mood of the country and mood plays a massive part in campaigns. To win over voters Labour needs to capture the mood with some simple messages that appeal to the people. Chris Trotter called this person “Waitakere man“.

First and foremost in the mind of most New Zealanders is will they have a job? The uncertain economic times means people fear losing their livelihood, so jobs becomes the main focus of the campaign.

“Let’s get New Zealand Working”

This message is one that will appeal to this sense of unease about not having jobs.  It should be then backed up with simple, clear messages that are statements of intent.

“More Jobs, Better Education, Fairer Taxes”

Labour - More Jobs

Three simple messages that are all about growing the economy and ensuring jobs are being created. More jobs could easily come from sensible government spending, especially if Labour are willing to look at the really high salaries of too many senior public servants, reduce them, and divert this money into areas that create jobs like infrastructure and front line services. Front line services are lower paid than Wellington bureaucrat jobs, so Labour could move many people into permanent employment by reducing spending on high paid bureaucrats.

Labour - Better Education
Better Education links nicely to more jobs. Our system is underfunded, and often targeted in the wrong areas. Labour should talk about funding students in courses that New Zealand needs like trades, teaching, nursing and practical, useful courses rather than dumb stuff like graphic design, arts, or low level business courses from second rate tertiary institutes.

They could also talk about taking money from the ministry of education to put into schools and preschools. “Free education” should not be a myth in the modern New Zealand. Schools should not have to fundraise incessantly, and parents should not have to pay a ‘voluntary levy’. This would clearly appeal to parents who are struggling to make ends meet and are being taxed by their schools to maintain basic standards that the government should fund.

Labour- Fairer Taxes

Fairer Taxes is a simple message around everyone paying their fair share, and taxes being used as a tool to grow the economy. Labour can make a good case for a more progressive tax system that means medium income people have more money to spend, which will grow the economy, which will increase the tax take.

The problem as I see it is that I don’t think Goff will get it. He has had no traction because he is all over the place on irrelevant, long-winded and complicated policies. It’s almost like he is trying to out policy-wonk Helen Clark, which we all know can’t be done.

He doesn’t understand the fear New Zealanders feel about their economic future. If he has an eureka moment and discovers that politics is simple, not complex and messages should be tight and to the point he could change the election.

Can he do it? I’m not so sure he can.

  • titan

    Labor could be creative and borrow some ingenuity from Tui to boost their campaign:

    For example:

    (1) Lets get NZ working with Labor… Yea Right!

    (2) More Jobs with Labor… Yea Right!

    (3) Better Education with Labor… Yea Right!

    (4) Fairer taxes with Labor… Yea Right!

    (5) Labor MP’s dont watch porno charged to Govt credit cards… Yea right!

    Sigh….. as had as we try, unfortunately…. only number 5 was believable!

  • abjv

    John Howard was successful with “mortgage rates are higher under Labor”.

    Whatever Phil’s slogan is, he has to come up with some plausable explanation as to how he is going to pay for Christchurch without blowing the limits of what NZ Inc can borrow, as well as what the Governement’s deficit can sustain. Or is he going to leave the rebuild to the private sector?

    We’ve already got Bill’s explanation (“sell off lumps of state assets and axe all expenditure we reckon the electorate will get us away with”) and Norman’s (“just tax the rich at 100% marginal rate”). Haven’t heard from Winston [did he survive the earthquake?] but it might involve the BNZ, horse racing, scampi and a load of investor-immigrant Yuan.

  • roger

    I didnt lose my job under national,and hone keys rort opps rule YER RIGHT

  • sandynobb

    Knowing Labour, these will be rendered as
    Lets get NZ Wanking
    More Yobs
    Beta Educashun
    Fairy taxes

    • gaskranken

      that is very good sand very good and what about the new labour brand – Labour with a weed at the top.

  • thor42

    “Better education” under Labour? Not a chance. Labour is the party of teachers and unionists. Does anyone really believe that (if they were elected) Labour would have an epiphany and turf out the dozens of abysmal teachers? If you believe that, I’ve got a harbour bridge I’d like to sell you.
    Labour were in power for ***nine looooong years*** and they did fuck-all for the quality of education in this country. They could have improved the teaching of reading by reintroducing phonics (which Doris Ferry used to great effect down here in Wgtn).
    They didn’t do so. They could have taken a trip up to Don Buck Primary up there in Auckland – *that* school uses phonics, and they have excellent results. So much so that they have no need for Reading Recovery (what a disaster that is).
    What is more, Don Buck School has a high proportion of its students speaking a language other than English as their first language. Labour, in that patronising, white-liberal oh-they’re-brown-so-they-will-fail way of theirs, would have done NOTHING for a school like that. They have shown that when they were in power last time – why would they change? Of course they won’t change.

    • alchemyst

      Dear Thor… do you have any idea what National have instructed the MoE (Ministry of Ed) and TEC (Tertiary Education Commission) to do???
      Tertiary institutes are about to be financially stung, to the tune of hundreds of thousands per year, if PI and Maori student number do not represent the general population (no matter how little a % some of those that are PI or Maori are) AND if these “special” students are not retained (ie do not complete the programme of study) or worse still FAIL their course. Please understand that MOST of these individuals need to be spoon fed to even cop with tertiary study. This is over and above having fees paid for, having separate services within institutes (special learning help, assistance, counselling and more). Thanks National!

  • Ciaron

    and they need sim­ple mes­sages that appeal to the aver­age New Zealand voter.
    They run “the peoples choice” line, but I reckon that’s damn false advertising.

  • Doug

    Whale don’t give Phil ideas he is a champion in the Lefts eyes he must be good. Being able to keep himself below 10% in the preferred PM stakes takes some doing.

    • mediatart

      Goff doesnt have a chance when Key hogs the headlines and photo opps.
      Its been revealed that the private equity owners of TV3 have been given a $43 mill lifeline by a so called private enterprise government, which has to borrow $300 mill a week ( before EQ) to stay afloat. Apparently going the way of Whitcoulls was not good enough for our new employees at TV3

      • gaskranken

        What private equity owners surely it doesn’t make any difference to you if we know who they are?

        And where’s proof that 43 mill went from the treasury accounts to tv3′s account?

  • Doug

    Mediatart
    Goff has nothing to say of relevance. When he speaks he gives mixed messages no wonder no one is listening.