June 2011

Armstrong on Brownlee

John Armstrong is generous with the accolades for Gerry Brownlee today:

It may not be the done thing to go into bat for Gerry Brownlee, but a lot of the stick he has been getting as Earthquake Recovery Minister has been unwarranted.

Sure, Brownlee’s patience can run too thin at times. Sure, there has been the occasional glitch in his running of his portfolios. Sure, it is blindingly obvious that you don’t tell people something is blindingly obvious. And we won’t dwell on his biggest political misjudgment – the misguided plan to let mining companies dig up national parks.

But when it comes to nous and instinct, Brownlee is the politician’s politician. On Thursday he stepped up to the mark and delivered the goods when it really mattered.

That would be nice of John if he was right.

Last Thursday wasn’t about Gerry delivering….anyone who knows anything about Christchurch knows that there are thousands of campervans locked up in Addington without a single occupant, that there are hundreds of temporary house likewise locked up without occupants.

Sources close to the PM are disappointed that Gerry is getting all the accolades when anyone who read bewteen the lines that Thursday was the PM’s work and Captain Panic Pants saved the day on this one.

Roy quits

The Dompost has an article about Heather Roy quitting politics, allegedly “on her own terms”.

The retiring ACT MP gives an exit interview to Andrea Vance and paints her foe Rodney Hide as an isolated figure.

When Heather Roy was sacked as ACT deputy leader and ordered to stay home for two weeks, she marched back into Parliament to confront Rodney Hide.

Now the defiant MP is leaving – but she’s doing so on her terms.

The Wellington-based list MP, 47, is retiring at the November election after nine years in Parliament.

“The time just feels right,” she said yesterday. “I didn’t feel it was time to leave last August. That would have been the easy thing to do. But I was worried about the state of the party.”

Her demotion from consumer affairs minister and associate roles in defence and education tore the ACT party apart. In a leaked dossier, Mrs Roy described Mr Hide as bullying and menacing. A year on the rift hasn’t healed.

“The big low point was last year when I was dumped. And pretty unceremoniously.”

Mrs Roy said she decided to return to Parliament early when Mr Hide said she was “fragile”.

“In politics they say it’s not being stabbed from the back you have to worry about, it’s being stabbed from the front. It was pretty torrid and tough. But it is politics.

“I can’t speak for what Rodney’s motivation might have been … I’m not sure what was gained, nothing very much for the party.

“But do I bear any animosity? Not really. You just have to move on with life.”

Oh how she lies. Make no mistake that this pouring of the heart from Heather Roy comes as she realises that her time is up. After 5 attempted coups and 5 failures to roll Rodney Hide she knows she hasn’t a chance. They had to finally roll in a man to do the job.

Now she is facing the prospect of a stroppy, opinionated woman hogging her limelight and calling her on her own bullshit, she cuts and runs.

This little fluff piece is nothing more than Heather Roy hearing of Cathy Odger’s application to stand and then throwing the toys. We are truly fortunate that Don Brash has a tin ear when listening to the carping of losers and showed her the door when she said she would quit if Odgers stood. His leadership is strengthened now with out a poisonous, duplcitious, lying, bac-stabbing loser sitting there undermining him.

She got Donned, it certainly wasn’t on her own terms that she is leaving. Good riddance to her.

 

Cactus for Act?

Apparently, news to me, but Audrey knows everything:

Cathy Odgers, the author of the acerbic website Cactus Kate, is expected to be approved today as an Act candidate – one of the reasons sitting MP Heather Roy is likely to today announce she will stand down at this year’s election.

Cathy Odgers is a corporate lawyer who lives in Hong Kong.

She is back in New Zealand and this week attended a private surprise party for former leader Rodney Hide in his favoured Newmarket haunt, the Mecca cafe and bar.

Prime Minister John Key also called in to the party for a couple of hours and spoke in glowing terms about Epsom MP Mr Hide, who was deposed as Act leader by Don Brash in April. The Act board is meeting in Auckland today.

Cathy Odgers’ blog, Cactus Kate, has been scathing about people in the party she believed had been disloyal to Mr Hide and undermined his leadership.

However, after the coup in April, she called for the infighting to stop and for the party to unite behind Dr Brash.

I just bet now that Heather Roy cutting and pasting furiously from Cactus’ blog and putting names to posts in an attempt to out her inveterate rooting. I say this out of my understanding that the person behind the outing of David Garrett’s criminal past was Heather herself, after he told a few home truths about her to her face in an ACT meeting.

Unfortunately for Heather this would not be a wise course of action ad I know Cactus is a follower and adherent to Whaleoil’s Rules of Politics in particular Rule 2, and she has more than enough stories about Heather Roy’s duplicity during her time as an ACT MP.

I reckon that Cathy should be an MP, she would be the most honest out there even if it up sets people. Since I have a track record of rating politicians when they are seeking office I thought I would do my usual pros and cons:

Pros
Not a grumpy old man
Lawyer with actual considerable business experience
International track record dealing with private and public sectors
Pots of cash and many ex boyfriends with pots of cash
Subscribes to the “No Dickheads” Rule
Business Roundtable approved candidate with free market purity
Conflicts completely with conservative Banks/Brash attitudes
Proven and loyal ACT voting record

Cons
Little patience for arseholes of all types of political persuasions
Subscribes to the “No Dickheads” Rule
Self-confessed rooter with terrible wandering eye and dubious taste in men
Promotes the use of alcohol and drugs
Conflicts completely with conservative Banks/Brash attitudes
She doesn’t have a pink Remington 870 pump in 20g
Will she take the pay cut? And does she really wish to be in a list position high enough to be elected?

She would be an honest politician, they are few and far between. If you are looking for an endorsement then you can do no better than those of her enemies.

Bomber is frothing before lunch-time on a Saturday. The man who willingly supports the truly hate-ful and racist Hone Harawira is shuddering like a dog shitting razor-blades at the mere thought of the prospect of Cathy Odgers telling it how it is. If Bomber was half the man that Cathy is he would stop sniping from the sidelines and participate in democracy. if he believes in the bro-letariat uprising that the Mana party allegedly represents then he should man up and put his name forward with other intellectual luminaries like Sue Bradford and John Minto and Willie Jackson. He won’t because he is a coward.

A response to the cripple on Asset Sales

Yesterday the political cripple responded to my Hansard extract post and thought he had neatly sidestepped the issue of Labour’s utter hypocrisy in opposing what they once supported. Strangely he now thinks I am in the pay of two research units. I wonder how he we will handle it when I publish something from Labour’s research unit that is emailed to me? Accuse me of being in the pay of three? Silly Duck, my research unit is Google.

Now here’s an even better example of Labour’s and Trevor Mallard’s forgotten (to them) history.

He was a contact for the proposal to sell down 49% of Air New Zealand to Qantas (released just before Christmas 2002)

“The Ministers leading the government’s response to the Air New Zealand – Qantas proposal are: Finance Minister Michael Cullen as holder of the Crown’s 82 percent shareholding in Air New Zealand, Transport Minister Paul Swain as holder of the Kiwi Share, and Associate Finance Minister Trevor Mallard.”

And what does this proposal to sell down 49% of Air NZ (when Trevor Mallard was a ‘go to’ Minister) tell us?

That:

  • The government would retain a majority 64 per cent shareholding.
  • Without it “there would also be a real risk that the government as the principal shareholder would be called on for further substantial funds, diverting government expenditure away from higher priorities in health and education.
  • Despite a 49% Qantas share the Government was satisfied that they could maintain “effective control of Air New Zealand by New Zealand nationals
  • They were confident they could preserve “the unique New Zealand identity of Air New Zealand
  • The proposal provides that the Air New Zealand board will retain absolute authority over Air New Zealand and manage the day to day operations of the joint venture.

There’s a word for Labour’s misguided asset sales campaign and it starts with ‘H’. Actually there are quite a lot of ‘H’ words that can be used. Let’s make a list in the comments.

It was always about the money

If people were in any doubt as to the rort that Hone Harawira was trying to organise, look no further than his Facebook Wall. The stupid bastard doesn’t even know he is standing in Te Tai Tokerau…he thinks he is standing for Kris Fa’afoi’s electorate.

Hone Harawira is boasting about being a party leaderIt was always about the money for Hone Harawira, moeny for him and money for Mana to campaign with.

This can all be stopped by the people of Te Tai Tokerau voting for Kelvin Davis. He actually is a good guy, not some venal racist thug looking for a parliament to mooch off.

Vote Kelvin Davis and stop Hone Harawira and his band of commie hangers on.

Interesting Juxtapostion

A picture tells a thousand words…I suppose it isn’t penguin sex though.

Penguin has 50/50 chance for survival

 

Tagged:

Why doesn't Mallard just export himself

I notice that Mallard has had another swipe at the Government for doing what it’s supposed to - and that’s letting KiwiRail make its own operational decisions when it is buying new trains.

I find this outrage just a little hard to handle - given that he was the shareholding Minister explaining why Air New Zealand should be free of political meddling when it was considering the oursourcing of engineering work…

Air New Zealand—Engineering Outsourcing

Tuesday 21 February 2006 Hansard source (external site)

1. SUE BRADFORD (Green) to the Minister of Finance: Does he believe that, as 82 percent shareholder of Air New Zealand, he should have been more proactive in finding a solution that would keep Air New Zealand’s engineering work in New Zealand?

Hon TREVOR MALLARD (Acting Minister of Finance): No. I would hope that the airline and unions talk further, but as a matter of policy the Minister of Finance, as shareholding Minister, does not intervene in the operational affairs of the airline.

Sue Bradford: Has the board of Air New Zealand shared with the Government shareholder its long-term strategic plan for this business; if so, does it show that what is happening at the moment is just the beginning of a whole series of changes that will lead to lay-offs and cuts in wages and conditions?

Hon TREVOR MALLARD: As Acting Minister of Finance, I am not privy to the details of the briefings between the board and the Minister of Finance.

Sue Bradford: Is the Minister aware that Air New Zealand has also put the jobs of over 100 cleaners on the line by putting cabin-cleaning work out to tender; and as a majority shareholder does he see any role at all in trying to get it to reverse its decision, especially in the light of Labour’s own industrial relations policies in the areas of contracting out and job security?

Hon TREVOR MALLARD: Yes and no.

Sue Bradford: How does the current Air New Zealand strategy of business transformation, which seems to involve slashing wages and jobs and contracting out, align with the Government’s strategic priority, as outlined by the Prime Minister last week, of economic transformation; if it does not, does the Minister think there is some way in which these two strategies can be aligned?

Hon TREVOR MALLARD: Without going into a lot of the detail, I think it is fair to say that many members of the House are aware that the future of Air New Zealand itself was at very serious risk when the Government bought back into it, and it is not out of the mire yet.

Clearly the pain killers and his impeding defeat in a cycle race are clouding his judgment. The crippled campaign manager just can’t get his facts right and continues to insist that National to do something which in the first instance is illegal and secondly something he knows can’t be done anyway.

He is struggling, along with his crippled party for relevance and so just flings murk from wherever he can dredge it up from.

 

The under-lying misogyny of National

Sexist ad from the 1950sJohn Key has worked hard to get women to vote for National. He is perhaps the only reason women vote for National. Unfortunately for National and for John Key National does have the deserved reputation of being a bit of an old boys network.

If you take a look at the board of directors of the party you can see this in that there are only 2 women on the board. Of the 58 MPs just 16 are women. The old boys network though works a little lower than that, with their grip fair and square on the Regional Chairs, in particular in Auckland and in the Central North Island.

The old boys network likes to use whisperings and rumours and innuendo to upset their opponents and this was sheeted home in two selections this year. In Rodney electorate during the first and later abandoned round of selections there was, quite apart from the skullduggery of Brent Robinson, a dirty little smear campaign running against one candidate. This smear campaign was outed by me and it nipped it in the bud. However the tactics and modus operandi of those running the smears had all the hallmarks of the old boys network. Strangely these dirty tactics disappeared in Rodney during the second take at selection and the only difference was that Scott Simpson dropped out of the race there and entered the race in Coromandel.

Scott succeeded in the race in Coromandel but again the old boys network came out to play. The same tactics and similar smears were used. Printouts of old news articles were circulated and whispers about it being “time for a man”, “avoiding the Katherine Rich problem” and bizarrely the sexual orientation of one of the candidates father were all used. Talk about young children was constantly referenced. They even resorted to lying about the involvement of paid advisors who were actually nowhere in evidence for any of the candidates in Coromandel. The whispering was being run hard out in order to spike the women candidates. Scott Simpson, in his selection speech, bizarrely mentioned all this gossip and innuendo and then professed innocence of it all by him or his team. Strictly speaking this was true. You see you can’t really have the Regional Chair, Peter Osborne, being overtly in your team when he is supposed to be running a fair and open selection process. Unfortunately the selection was far from that with a serious amount of interference by Peter Osborne in the attempting to manipulate delegates. It was so bad that at one point that he was spoken to by the hierarchy and told to pull his head in.

I raise Peter Osborne’s name because it is relevant to another rather nasty whispering and smear campaign being run right now against a sitting National MP who also happens to be a woman. Multiple sources have confirmed that the source of the smears and whispers is Peter Osborne and he is gunning for this MP so he can arrange for a bloke to take over when she bottles it and quits. The thing is this story has been around for some time and there is very little substance to the whispers but in politics if you have to start explaining your position then you are losing. And this is how the old boys network operates. They start the whispers, the phone calls, the knowing nods. It is very hard to stop because no one can pin down where it is coming from. But as was the case with Rodney, if these tactics are outed and the people involved named then the whispers stop. They no longer have currency.

However it shows an under-lying misogyny in National in particular sectors. The thing is though, none of these big brave men have ever had the gumption to stand for selection themselves. They prefer the smoke-filled rooms, the sneaky whisperings and manipulations and they have a wee chortle to themselves about it all.

When you start joining dots though you start to see the pattern and it wasn’t until I started blogging about the lack of diversity that National faces with its list ranking that the tipline really started humming. I mentioned Scott Simpson and Peter Osborne, but with Alasdair Thompson making a fool of himself with his sexist and misogynistic utterings another dot was joined. You see Alasdair Thompson was one of the team that Scott Simpson recruited to endorse him in him in his brochure. Another dot fell into place too. The leader of the most sexist and anti-women party in parliament, Don Brash, also lobbied on behalf of Scott Simpson in Coromandel. When you join those dots with the anti-women murmurings of Peter Osborne then you get to see that there really is an underlying misogyny lurking beneath the surface in National.

All of this is of course highly ironic when you consider that National is sending out a brochure to all its members right now celebrating Women in the Party. It even has a slogan, “Service before Self”. Worse the brochure leaves off National’s longest serving woman MP, Georgina Te Heu Heu and doesn’t mention her service at all. She epitomises “Service before Self”. She was the first Maori woman to gain a law degree admitted to the High Court in New Zealand and the longest standing woman mp in national, and was the Women’s Affairs Minister 1998-1999, and now current minister. They can’t say it is because she is leaving because they include 3 former MPs.

The time os the old boys network is over. They should pack their bags and bugger off, their type of politics has no place in New Zealand anymore.

H&X: A Dog's Tale

Henrietta & Xena: A Dog's Tale

Simon Power and the law of unintended consequences

Former third rate provincial conveyancing lawyer, Simon Power has completely changed the laws around Financial Advisors, and as may be expected from a third rate provincial conveyancing lawyer he didn’t actually take into account the law of unintended consequences.

It is now illegal to provide financial advise to anyone unless you are a registered financial advisor, and Simon Power’s people at the FMA will give you a good kick in the arse if you try. Unfortunately for Simon Power there has been a lot of unintended consequences of this new law that this blog wants to highlight. There was little point in highlighting them through the Select Committee process as everyone who tried got the bums rush from Simon Power who didn’t realise many of the submitters were people who will be deciding what jobs they should offer him after he retires to appease his missus.

One interesting scenario is if you happen to have a mate called Terry who owns a lot of property but has got himself in a bit of strife for not pay bills to annoyingly bureaucratic and persistent outfits like ACC and the IRD due to being caught with his pants down in the middle of a major property bust.

So you happen to be having a few ouzos with your mate Terry and he asks you for your opinion of whether he should spend $1.5m of his mothers money on a nice man in the middle east that promises to refinance his property portfolio.

Being full of ouzo and forgetting that Simon Power has introduced new rules saying who is allowed to say what to who about financial matters without being “regulated”, you break the law by mentioning to your mate Terry that you happened to see the same middle eastern gentleman in the Sydney Morning Herald getting accused of ripping off a bunch of Australians with similar problems to Terry with similarly annoyingly bureaucratic and persistent Australian outfits.

You are overheard giving this “financial” advice to your good ouzo drinking mate Terry by some members of Simon Power’s new bureaucracy. They decide Simon Power would be very pleased with such a trophy case, considering the PR effort they have gone to deflect attention from their poor performance thus far, and especially when it is easy to prove when Terry is not drinking ouzo he is a financial wizz kid and doesn’t need unregulated advice from someone who doesn’t have the new ticket Simon Power demands you have before offering financial advice.

This is blindingly obvious as a hypothetical situation that would never happen provided Simon Power‘s people act with common sense, but if they decide to follow the law closely they could actually prosecute this blogger for offering Terry financial advice via this video.

Other blindingly obvious hypothetical cases will appear on the blog in the next few weeks.