More good press for Goff…Not

Felix Marwick give Phil Goff a serve:

But the Labour leadership issue highlights some of the developments that stemmed from its succession plan at the last election. At the time it was seen by many (and I was one) that to have an orderly transition which saw experience retained was not a bad move. Experienced senior MPs led by Phil Goff were there to develop the party’s new talent and build an opposition party of force and skill.

Well, that’s the way it was supposed to work.

Hindsight is a marvellous thing and it’s easy to say this now. But perhaps the better option for Labour would have been to wipe the slate clean. Have a fresh start with new faces and no lingering ties to the Clark years. Perhaps that would have allowed voters to more easily identify with a new Labour Party and not suffer the hangovers of the past. It could very well have shortened Labour’s time in opposition. However the decision was made, history’s been written, and we will never know what might have been.

 

  • Anonymous

    That’s what happens when self righteousness and ego gets involved………………………….

  • jabba

    I, as with many others, have been saying that Goff was not only the obvious replacement for Clark but still is. hehe

  • thor42

    Labour is *still* infested with people from the Clark years.
    Tired old go-nowhere types like Goof, Annette King, Mallard and so on.  Thank gawd George Hawkins in Manurewa has retired – I thought he’d be there until they carried him out in a box. 
    Although I don’t agree with people like Clare Curran, at least she has energy – unlike 99% of the rest of the Labour MPs. 
    Most of them look as if they should be running an Op Shop or dusty old second-hand bookshop.

  • Elma Fudd

    And they should be……and the sooner the better.

  • Anonymous

    How well prepared was labour for Clarks resignation on the night?

  • MrV

    Hardly fair that Goff got asked to polish the turds …