In a plastic surgeonâ€™s quest to find the ideal female proportions, he turned to 100 glamour models..
It sounds almost like parody â€“ a top consultant plastic surgeon spends three months studying models appearing on Page 3 of a bestselling British red-top newspaper. Later this month he reveals his findings: the mathematical proportions of the perfect breast.
Of course, the subjectivity of such a statement canâ€™t be ignored â€“ not to mention the somewhat dubious nature of the source material. But astonishingly, when shown computer mock-ups of the female form based on these equations, most women agree that they are indeed the ideal vital statistics.
Incredibly, although breast augmentation â€“ or the boob job, as it is commonly known â€“ has long been the most popular cosmetic surgery procedure, nobody within the industry has ever quantified the measurements and proportions that make a breast appealing to the eye.
And this energetic plastic surgeon has put in the time and research and finally nailed the magic formula.
For the first time plastic surgeons now have a powerful visual imagery of the proportions that make a breast attractive. â€˜Now we can show women images to highlight shape and form that will actually give them what they want,â€™ says Mallucci.
Software has been developed using three-dimensional, predictive photography to enable surgeons to show patients on a screen how their own breasts would look with implants of different shapes and sizes.
â€˜Many women seek breast surgery after pregnancy has left them with deflated breasts and comment that theyâ€™d like fullness added to the top.
‘But when shown an image of a womanâ€™s breasts that fit the 45:55 ratio versus breasts that have more fullness on the upper pole, very few women ever then select the latter.â€™
As Mallucci concludes, itâ€™s not that most surgeons donâ€™t know what makes a breast attractive, itâ€™s just that nobodyâ€™s studied and defined it before. In theory it could lead to a reduction in the number of poor boob jobs.
I’m all for the reduction in the number of poor boob jobs.
The features analysed were the dimensions of the upper and lower pole, medical terms that describe the areas above and below the nipple; plus the angle at which the nipple points and the slope of the upper pole.
â€˜The study revealed that in all cases the nipple â€˜â€˜meridianâ€™â€™ â€“ the horizontal line drawn at the level of the nipple â€“ lay at a point where, on average, the proportion of the breast above it represented 45 per cent of overall volume of the breast and below it 55 per cent.
â€˜In the majority of cases the upper pole was either straight or concave, and the nipple was pointing skywards at an average angle of 20 degrees. In all cases the breasts demonstrated a tight convex lower pole â€“ a neat but voluminous curve.
It looks like this: