Good on the Maori party

The Maori party has called for parliament to act on name suppression:

The Maori Party is calling for name suppression laws to change as soon as possible, after a former All Black was granted name suppression after pleading guilty to assaulting a child.

He appeared in Auckland District Court yesterday charged with the September assault, the New Zealand Herald reports.

Another former All Black appeared in Wellington District Court two weeks ago, charged with assaulting his partner while celebrating the All Blacks’ World Cup final victory, resisting police and possessing cannabis. He was also given name suppression.

Maori Party co-leader Tariana Turia has slammed the most recent name suppression.

“In this morning’s paper we have the ludicrous situation of two individuals involved in cases of child assault – one protected and the other exposed to public scrutiny,” Ms Turia said.

She was referring to the case of Auckland mother Mellissa Anderson, who was refused name suppression while facing charges for allegedly slapping a 14-year-old girl who attacked her daughter, Summer, outside school last week.

Ms Turia says it “makes a mockery of the justice system” that a 13-year-old girl’s identity was released into the public arena, while a former All Black can keep his name secret.

“For former All Black players, there appears to be another set of standards at play,” she said.

I said at the time that Simon Power’s law changes would be ignored by Judges. I know the law doesn’t come into effect for several more months but I rpredict that the status quo will continue to exist. The law changes didn’t go far enough in removing name suppression and protecting the innocent victims.

Now an ex-All Black is smearing the names of other former team mates through his cowardice.

  • diabolos

    He may even be Maori .. who knows.  Till they stop suppressing names none of us know.

    • Anonymous

      When contacted for comment, the sportsman said: “You’ve got a better chance of getting a [winning] Lotto ticket bro. Cheers bro.”

  • Sars

    I guess the only difference here is that if I beat my own kid I can get name suppression but if I beat someone else’s kid I don’t. What sort of message does that send????

  • sthnjeff

    While I agree with her sentiments, an MP , a Minister at that, should not be commenting on decisions and cases still before the court.

    • Peter Wilson

      He’s pleaded guilty hasn’t he? It’s probably not going to change the outcome I wouldn’t have thought.

    • TT

      A nonsense comment that entirely misunderstands sub judice rules. And until a new government is formed she is not a Minister. Catch up!

      • sthnjeff

        You are talking semantics here…  while she may not technically be a minister, It is common convention that a Member of Parliament does not comment on cases that are still in court. This ex AB scum still has to be sentenced and the principal of not interference from Parliamentarians in the business of courts still applies. Cathch Up

  • vicarsdaughter

    High profile people should be exposed – they certainly don’t shy away from positive exposure where it can be had. Because of this they have a greater responsibility to earn and deserve their public profiles from which they profit at an almost obscene scale. Their actions, whether good or bad, should be generally available information and have the potential to impact their wallets by allowing people to make informed choices. Lets face it, it’s not as if our rugby loving masses are suddenly going to turn their nose up at an ABs game cos one of their number from previous years gave his kid a hiding. We’re a nation too much in love with rugby for that sort of caper. But knowledge of the man in question’s behaviour should at least prevent any future employers hiring him, for example, to work in the care of children.

  • BalancedView

    Anyone know who it is?