Random Impertinent Questions

Andrew Little’s cost justification for ignoring New Plymouth raises some impertinent questions:

At the candidates’ meeting, he is asked if he will still move there if he does not win the seat but gets in on the list. He answers no. It is a question that has come up before and he’s managed to come up with a cunning excuse – that it will save the taxpayers’ money if they don’t have to pay his Wellington accommodation and commuting costs.

If Andrew Little won’t make a commitment to New Plymouth if he doesn’t win because it will save accommodation and commuting costs, is he now encouraging all scum List MPs to base themselves in Wellington?

Is this now Labour’s standard attitude towards the provinces?

  • Paulus

    Little Andrew is not really interested in New Plymouth.

    He is looking at Mt Roskill, along with copious others, but as Labour leader (Union Branch) it is his entitlement.

    • notavictim

      is it little andrew or stuart little, i get them mixed up.

  • Spam

    So presumably we won’t have to pay for his New Plymouth electorate office either?

    • Frosty

      In an ideal world we won’t be paying his salary full stop after the election.

  • Topps

    Are you shaw Little hasn’t made a deal with the Independent.. The New Plymouth Independent has been openly campaigning National and Act voters .. to vote for him .. to give Key’s a coalition partner.