About Blogging Well

With the release of the Law Commission report focussing on blogging and whether or not bloggers are media, as is usual there is a certain amount of deus ex machina that an article about “blogging well” appeared in my feed reader.

Technology writer Dan Frommer  proposes 10 rules for better blogging, which match pretty closely to exactly what the Law Commission are talking about and the direction I have been moving this blog in over the past year.

Dan posts his rules as a reference but also to remind him to try to adhere to them. I will re-post them here too, and see if I can do the same as I think sum up where my thinking is at with the direction the blog needs to take:

  1. Above all else, factual accuracy and attention to detail. That’s the easiest and best way to build and maintain trust over the long-term. If a fact is wrong, fix it and don’t be shy about it. If an opinion or prediction is wrong, learn from it and consider explaining how you got it wrong.
  2. Write the site that you want to read. That covers story selection, length, frequency, style, vocabulary, attitude, humor, level of sensationalism, and more. Don’t publish anything you’re not proud of. Be yourself.
  3. Be more skeptical. Companies and people have no interest in telling any side of the story but their own. Often, that side is flawed, invalid, or incorrect. Let someone else be the gullible one who looks silly later: Always question everything. (But don’t let it turn you into too much of a conspiracy theorist.)
  4. Attribute well — the way you’d want to be attributed. Use names, link prominently, never plagiarize. Quote or paraphrase the part of an article that you need to make your point, but always with the goal of sending readers to the original site for the full story. (Some credit here to Henry Blodget, for Business Insider’s original excerpting policy in 2009. And to John Gruber, whose attribution activism is good for the web.) Aim to become as big of a traffic referrer as you possibly can — not only is that good policy, but it’s a great business asset.
  5. Add context. Don’t assume people know what you’re talking about, especially if it’s obscure or technical. That doesn’t mean you need to rewrite five paragraphs of back-story for every new update to a news story — that’s usually a waste of time. But at least make sure that a good explanation of what’s going on is a click or two away.
  6. Be critical, but don’t be unfair. You’re not a jerk in person. Don’t be one on the Internet. (Unless it’s funny, of course.)
  7. Care about your writing. Spell things correctly. Write clearly. Avoid jargon or meaningless business-speak. Learn how to use apostrophes. It really is a reflection of quality.
  8. Care about your design. Don’t make your site more complicated than it needs to be. Like editing text, you can often improve design by deleting. That doesn’t mean you shouldn’t have photos and illustrations, just make sure they’re adding to the experience. Try to keep load times as short as possible, and note that many readers may be using mobile devices (and slow connections) to access your site. Make the right tradeoffs between revenue, flashiness, and clutter.
  9. Don’t be the 10th person to write the same thing. Say something that everyone else will wish they’d thought of. It takes longer, and it’s harder, but it’s worth it. When someone beats you to it, share their work if you love it — then they’ll want to share yours.
  10. Try new things, all the time. Especially those that are a little outside your comfort zone. This is the Internet — don’t act like you’re writing for Time Magazine in the 80s. Stories can be pictures, charts, lengthy essays, numbered lists, or 140 characters. Measure how your experiments do, and take the results into account for the future.
  • Ben R001

    Excellent post Cam. Something I will keep as future reference if and when I start my own blog :-)

  • Kane Bunce

    I am pretty much already doing most if not all of those. The experience from when I had a moderately successful blog many years ago helps a lot with that (it was a niche subject so was always only going to get a moderate level of success. Eventually I had to kill the blog due to a lack of a PC for well over a year, which meant losing all my readers, but it done well when it was active.

    But this was an interesting read anyway. Thanks.

  • JK

    No wonder the newspapers don’t like this at all. They would completely stumble over clause 1 to begin with judging from their current demeanor of not letting the truth get in the way of a good story. And of their slavishly following what is being dictated to them by the powers that be, as is so obvious from their covering of the global warming/climate change/adverse weather etc to name at least one sample.

  • Sars

    It’s funny how I just thought these were general rules for writing well; whether on a blog, in a newspaper article, or an essay at University. 

  • Anonymous

    If only the NZ ‘news’ websites would work to similar rules. 1, 4 (especially ‘never plagiarize’), and 7 they need to seriously work on.

17%