What now for the Greens

The Green party looks like yet again being a party of opposition. Never trusted by Labour and distrustful of National, they are becoming a pollyanna party, but where that focus on the optimistic ignores that they have never been part of a government. Karl du Fresne accurately and succinctly explains:

Everyone commented on what a great campaign the Greens ran. Certainly they seemed to pick up a lot of former Labour supporters, and their electoral appeal can only have broadened since the departure of polarising figures such as Sue Bradford and Nandor Tanczos. In fact it looks as if the Greens are re-positioning themselves as a mainstream party of the centre-left (watch out Labour) rather than one on the beansprouts-and-sandals fringe. Russel Norman’s stylish suit and tie are a clue to that; the eccentric garb of the late Rod Donald is already a distant memory.

But just wait: the Greens have yet to be fully tested. They have never been exposed to Minor Party Curse, the fatal affliction that strikes small parties once they formally become part of coalition government arrangements. That’s when the stresses start to tell and party discipline starts to fall apart.

As long as a party remains outside government, as the Greens have done, it can safely occupy the moral high ground. Its high-minded principles are unlikely to be compromised. But the moment a party is drawn into a coalition, deals are done and principles get stretched. Ambitions are unleashed and tensions arise between idealists and pragmatists. It happened to the Alliance and it happened to ACT – both parties, like the Greens, with a strong ideological base. Being in government also means a minority party is subjected to much more intense media scrutiny. All things considered, the Greens might have a more assured future if they remain in opposition. A memorandum of understanding with National may be as far as they can safely go.

  • Ben R001

    You never know, the Art of Patience cpuld be at play. Labour might never recover and the Greens being the new major Party “against” National. Now that would be something different :-)

  • Peter Wilson

    It makes a mockery of democracy for a party like the Greens to be continually in opposition. As du Fresne says, they can take the moral high ground, and never be tested. Who doesn’t want to save the planet, create jobs, and tackle child poverty. BTW when did it become “child poverty?”

    Let them make the tough decisions, where they might be saving the planet, but causing people to lose their jobs as well, and see how they fare.

    • Troy

      True, and the Greens can’t even win an electorate seat – what a farce.

  • Kiwikea

    The Lib Dems in the UK are finding this out too.

  • Jaffa

    The Maori Party are finding this out.

    If they go with National, they lose supporters.

    If they don’t, they are ineffective, and……..lose supporters.

  • Sadu

    I agree also. It’s all well and good to occupy the high-ground, but it also means that nothing gets achieved. Does the green party want to have a go at implementing some policies that will help save the planet (which means compromising to some degree)? Or do they want to be able to point the finger at National and say “told you so” when the armageddon comes?

    Their current position suggests the latter.

  • MrAuz1989

    What was it Lange that called the Greens, “The Party of purity and failure”

  • Anonymous

     Yes ,the Greens have yet to be fully tested alright.
    First is explain how their ‘green jobs’ policy works , how it creates jobs and what it contibutes to the gdp of our country.All these questions, batted away during the election because ‘we the people of New Zealand’ had 1 month of run up to the election after the RWC.Flash talking points to green policy- indoctrinated teens and yoof ,who can now vote, are all the watermelons have run on , now comes the inquisition time.Time to open up this can of hippocrite.