Lucky to be alive

silly kids names is a 1 second thought by immature parent/s. perhaps when they are old enough lets given them the chance to formally change their name and not carry on with the burden of their parent/s mistake. prhaps include that ms bennett in your report of action.

For some of these loser parents the act of producing a sprog is the only “productive” thing they do in their entire lives, and the naming of the poor child is their “15 minutes of fame” moment. With at best a double-digit IQ (and no education) through the fug of booze and drugs, the best the parent(s) come up with are trash-culture cliches and mis-spelt ebonic abstractions – the poor kid has to suffer with the label (and the clear signal to the world that they are the spawn of loser parents) for the rest of their lives.

Compounded by the fact that the fact that the mother is probably drunk or out of it during the whole process (ie from conception onwards) and the likely subsequent affects of Fetal Alcohol Syndrome, means the chance of a normal healthy life for the kid are almost nil.

These kids aren’t planned, just the by-product of a selfish party lifestyle, so the quality of the parenting will always be poor to non-existant.

This lifestyle leapfrogs the nature/nurture debate – these kids are damaged by both.

To the rest of society, the obvious reaction to the kid with the ridiculous name is caution. SFNS is just an early warning that you may be dealing with damaged goods, a problem child from a problem environment – perhaps the one positive aspect of SFNS.

You can just imagine some stoned rope headed father turning up to the birthing room (direct from the skate park) and seeing the latter part of the birth proudly declaring “That’s Gnarley Dude!!” and it stuck from then on..

For too many Children in New Zealand are Income, and that’s the only way they know, or want to know.
Imagine as in UK now the Moslem’s are now well into intergenerational welfare. They are outbreeding everybody else by enormous quantities. Families of 12 children are not unusual and the girls at 14 are “married” to other families only to reproduce again and again within 15 year generation cycles.
I believe I read that by 2050 they will represent over 50% of the population at the current birth rate.
Look at their welfare bills.

I like the Cameron idea in the UK of setting a household limit on benefits. this would include the benefit of cheap state housing. I think that want it at about the average wage, people and particularly the Bishops in the House of Lords are all upset, but I think that people should follow Norman Tebitt’s  advise  of get off your chuff,get on your bike, and find a job.

no, steve maharey actually told beneficiaries that there were certain parts of the country that they needn’t bother moving to if they think they can get away from finding work. as for shower heads and light bulbs that was a greens initiative. ok so i’m splitting hairs i know but credit, and blame where its due ok ? yes myself and my wife and daughters were recipients of plunket nurses attention . so we’re agreed, not all intervention by quasi government bodies is so bad?