If child abuse leads to children choosing to become gay (a ridiculous premise) then Colin Craig should in theory be opposed to anything that could be construed as child abuse or potentially lead to child abuse.
It has been argued by some (on a dodgy premise) that child smacking is a form of abuse or can be used to discount actual child abuse, so therefore child smacking is a potential indicator of homosexuality in adults. And when you think about it, the use of one’s hand firmly and repeatedly placed on the buttocks of a child sounds gay in Colin Craig terms.
Why then is Colin Craig one of New Zealand’s greatest promoters of homosexuality?
I know its faulty logic, but if you are like Colin Craig, then logic doesn’t really matter.