Must read

What's hot

Operation 8 laugh in
tame-iti
8

Random Impertinent Questions

by Whaleoil on September 15, 2012
  1. I wonder what words the Human Rights Commission have they actually ruled incite racially disharmony in what circumstances.
  2. Is there a list? We know white motherfucker and house nigger are ok.
  3. Is house nigger now less offensive than cheeky darkie?
  4. I would think house nigger much more offensive but then I am neither a nigger nor a cheeky darkie so could someone who is either of those demographics please explain?
  5. If Paul Holmes had to apologise to a cheeky darkie then how come Hone Harawira doesn’t have to apologise to the house niggers?
Tagged: • • • •

Related posts

  • Tutaekuri

    1/ a) E kai nga tutae me e mate , Hone , Tutaekuri *
    b) fatherfucker
    c) plastic honky

    * currently awaiting a decision.

  • http://truebluenz.com/ Redbaiter

    These are all quite valid questions Whale, but they’ve all been asked before.

    We’ve been over this ground again and again yet nothing changes.

    The questions are met with the same contemptuous silence that they always have been.

    Because they are not ever meant to have an answer.

    You have to understand the strategy behind the left’s objective to change society, to break down what exists, and replace it with the model they favour.

    Once you do understand that strategy, then the answers become plain.

    Its called Cultural Marxism, or Critical Theory and its a strategy based on endless criticism of the status quo, or what is traditional.

    You may not understand it, but the hardened communist De Bres knows it well. So does Helen Clark and every other Fabian socialist. It’s standard Neo-Marxist strategy straight out of the Frankfurt school.

    Read about it at the link below. It’s a very important essay for it lays bare the strategy of those Progressives who want to destroy our ‘traditional” society and replace it with socialist/ Marxist Nirvana.

    If you read the essay, you should afterwards understand well enough why the Progressives will never answer your questions.

    http://www.academia.org/the-origins-of-political-correctness/

    • http://www.facebook.com/robert.chisholm.98 Robert Chisholm

      The Ccommissioner has answered the queries bout the use of the word nigger by a paid member of the NZ legislature.
      “My only response publicly has been to say that Hone Harawira’s comments were really dumb. ”
      This is the public response of the HRC to the use of the word “darkie”
      ….it was a flippant but inappropriate description of one of the world’s most outstanding citizens.

      “Whether he meant it in good humour or not is beside the point,” he said.

      “It is a free country but people who have positions of responsibility on the airwaves should also exercise their responsibility appropriately,” Mr de Bres said.
      …..
      In general, here is the position with respect to the HRC
      “The use of such an abusive term is however not, in itself, a breach of the Human Rights Act. While the Act does cover serious threats to racial harmony, it is not enough that a comment offends people who read it, is racist or factually inaccurate – such comment is protected by s.14 of the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 which affirms the right of freedom of expression. Only comments that actually incite racial disharmony, rather than merely offend, are unlawful under the Human Rights Act.” So what appears to be the situation is that the “niggers” who HH refererred to were merely offended, and they did not feel inclined to bop him, therefore racial disharmony was not a result, or if they did it was nigger on nigger which also means no disharmony,therefore the HRC has no role to play. Funny , but if I imagine that some other public person, let us say a former MP who is now associated with W(h) anganui, would refer to the very same people with the very same words used by HH, then all hell would break loose and racial disharmony would be an issue and the HRC would be required to jump into action.The bottom line seems to be that “niggers “can use the “N” word with impunity, but “whitemotherfuckers” probably are not allowed to.For the record , here are some Dutch words which are offensive :P iktrekker (wanker)Klootsak (scotum)These words, if spoken to an average Dutchman by a white mother fucker,would be very offensive, but if spoken by a nigger to a Dutchman, might well go beyond offensiveness, and invoke racial disharmony.I apologise to all for the use of offensive language.
      “The use of such an abusive term is however not, in itself, a breach of the Human Rights Act. While the Act does cover serious threats to racial harmony, it is not enough that a comment offends people who read it, is racist or factually inaccurate – such comment is protected by s.14 of the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 which affirms the right of freedom of expression. Only comments that actually incite racial disharmony, rather than merely offend, are unlawful under the Human Rights Act.”

      So what appears to be the situation is that the “niggers” who HH refererred to were merely offended, and they did not feel inclined to bop him, therefore racial disharmony was not a result, or if they did it was nigger on nigger which also means no disharmony,therefore the HRC has no role to play. Funny , but if I imagine that some other public person, let us say a former MP who is now associated with W(h) anganui, would refer to the very same people with the very same words used by HH, then all hell would break loose and racial disharmony would be an issue and the HRC would be required to jump into action.
      The bottom line seems to be that “niggers “can use the “N” word with impunity, but “whitemotherfuckers” probably are not allowed to.
      For the record , here are some Dutch words which are offensive :
      Piktrekker (wanker)
      Klootsak (scotum)
      These words, if spoken to an average Dutchman by a white mother fucker,would be very offensive, but if spoken by a nigger to a Dutchman, might well go beyond offensiveness, and invoke racial disharmony.
      I apologise to all for the use of offensive language.

  • jabba

    maybe Doris De Beers is on holiday?

  • OneTrack

    This is Aotearoa, 2012 . By definition, only a pakeha male, older the better, can incite racial disharmony. Anybody else, especially someone with some fraction of maori blood is assured a free ride, both by De Brees and the left-wing media we enjoy. Its all the white mans fault. Job done.

    • Dave

      Unfortunately One Track, I agree with you.

      Perhaps the office of DeBoris and his Cohorts, were included in a treaty settlement or similar, as Hone and his Maori mates certainly have him in their pockets. When will his words, and racial statements be taken seriously, i for one can not stand this man. He is a could mouth racist mongrel.

  • pukakidon

    Does this mean that the Human Rights Commission has give the go ahead for anyone to refer to Maori MPs as house Nig@#rs? Therefore we now have Hones new nickname.

  • Troy

    I wonder how the HRC nutters would respond to your questions WO. The questions are succinct, to the point and demand an answer to a tax-paying citizen… mmm i wonder if they would bother to respond.

%d bloggers like this: