Farrar on Dompost Non-denial

David Farrar has blogged about the lame comment from the Editor of the Dompost about Truth’s cover story published yesterday about Greg King.

The story has information which could only have come (directly or indirectly) from family members.

Dominion Post editor Bernadette Courtney told NBR ONLINE the Truth story was wrong and she had no further comment.

That’s the sort of response you normally get from politicians, not media. It is called a non denial, denial.

Saying a story is wrong, and saying nothing else, means that one word could be wrong. It is not saying that the substantive allegation is incorrect. A proper denial would be “There was no investigation and there was no contact with Mr King or his family that week”. Of course you can only make a denial like that, if you are sure that no one can not prove otherwise.

Also rare to have an Editor to refuse to comment beyond a non denial, denial. If you worked for Fairfax and were doing a story on the ethical conduct of a business, would you accept such a statement from the CEO and regard it as the end of the matter?

  • Phar Lap

    Seems on Radio Live Michael Laws concurs with Farrow.Laws says he will not let the mystery of Greg King and the Dom-Post involvement rest.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Greg-Davis/624235869 Greg Davis

    “Of course you can only make a denial like that, if you are sure that no one can not prove otherwise.”

    Farrar means to say “if you are sure that no one can prove otherwise.”

101%