I bet he was registered too, Ctd

Another dodgy pedo teacher has been outed. I just bet he was registered too, since the unions claim this protects the children and it is why Charter Schools should be opposed.

What the Teacher unions and the Teachers’ Council fail to understand is it their cone of silence over sex offenders that harms children, it is name suppression that harms children by allowing them to remain anonymous. Now that he has been named I bet there will be an avalanche of fresh charges.

Every time I see a case like this and the Judges refusing to continue name suppression I am glad I made my stand to get the law changed.

A man facing a raft of sex and drug-related charges in connection with seven young women can now be revealed as a senior teacher.

Name suppression has been lifted for Damian Christopher Gillard, 43, after an appeal hearing in the High Court at Auckland yesterday was abandoned.

He initially faced three criminal charges of grooming for sex, unlawful sexual connection with a child aged between 12 and 16 and offering to supply methamphetamine.

However, several other alleged victims have since come forward and Gillard now faces four additional charges of indecency with a girl aged 12-16, one of indecent assault, two further charges of offering to supply methamphetamine, two of supplying methamphetamine and one charge of assisting someone under 18 to supply sexual services.

“All the allegations are strongly denied,” said defence lawyer Paul Wicks.

Gillard is the head of the te reo Maori department at Papatoetoe High School in South Auckland.

He has worked there for 10 years but was suspended in July when police notified the school of the pending criminal charges.

  • Mitch82

    Out of interest, are there many/any of these kind of cases where the offender is found not guilty?

    • trisha

      you would have to look at Court records and it cost’s money to do that…you could also look at MsD but it would take a long time to come up with anwers…….suppression is every parent’s nightmare…..my opinion is there are a lot abuser’s/teacher’s found not guilty on technicality….

      • Mitch82

        Yeah. I’m just wondering what the statistics would look like of actual ‘pleaded not guilty’ cases convicted, versus ‘pleaded not guilty’ cases discharged.

        My thinking is it could be an interesting study that could lead to automatic denial of name suppression unless the victim applies for it. But the flipside I’m getting as is that while it might make for an increased preventative measure for would-be offenders, it could also be a potent weapon for someone who wants to trash another’s reputation.

        Meh.. musings.

        • trisha

          yes that is a good point …. approach the school of social work epsom auck and ask them to do a study…the students would have full access to relevant material…..
          the negative being… a innocent man may have his whole life ruined maybe…..let me balance our opinion and point of view….. 47 little boys who have their whole lives fucked up and may go on to fuck up another 100 little boys…ummmm .sorry, at the end of the day the man has to take one for the human race…… of course our judges will be able to recognize the innoncent……anywaay …….
          pleaded not guilty…. cases convicted ……would be in court records or
          Deptarment of Corrections under convicted sex offenders.
          pleaded not guilty.. .cases discharged….. would be in the nz police files
          I dont think it would make much difference with name suppression, ie 4 ex policeman on a rape charge that were really in jail for rape but no one knew till the case was over. they were found not guilty of rape …while in jail for rape WTF
          the question I really want answered is …why men do that shit?

  • James

    Although he may well be guilty, maybe you should wait for a conviction before you call him a “dodgy pedo”. If he gets off, he could sue you for defamation.

    • http://twitter.com/Orcs2Elves Monique Angel

      Nah. No need to wait for a conviction to call him a dodgy pedo. Spade a spade. Pedo’s have people falling all over themselves to normalise their behaviour. Hence the boy bumming sect of the otherwise upstanding Catholic church.

      I would go so far as to say Gillard is a dodgy pedo cunt.

      And he’s welcome to come sue my arse in California. Cunt couldn’t get a seat on AIr NZ and that’s why name suppression has been lifted.

      High probability of guilt and so many victims they are not identifiable; name suppression is not justified.
      And that’s all opinion.

      • Travis Poulson

        Heh, your language nearly made a potty mouth such as myself blush!

%d bloggers like this: