With all the furore over Richard Prosser’s “wogistan” comments, and his subsequent apology, I though it might be prudent to go read his book.
You see I don’t believe he is sincere in his apology. I think he only did it because Winston made him. An apology that is not sincere isn’t an apology at all.
Well, I’m glad I did read his book because on Page 166 we can see that his apology is meaningless:Ā
His apology is meaningless, not made with true remorse, in fact he thinks he shouldn’t ever have to apologise at all. Those who complain about his comments have “opinions [that] don’t count anyway”.
Just we are all straight on this…I’d prefer it if he never apologised. Then he would be true to himself, but instead he has now proven himself to be spineless and a weasel.