WhaleTech: Sharing is a Human Right decrees EU Court of Human Rights

ge-tt-offers-instant-one-click-file-sharing-28515df2e8

via: Mashable

Rick Falkvinge reports

The European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg is no dismissible small player. It is the court that oversees the¬†European Convention on Human Rights¬†(ECHR), which is part of the Constitution of the European Union and of most European states. When this court makes a decision, that decision gets¬†constitutional¬†status in all of Europe … it¬†declared that the copyright monopoly stands in direct conflict with fundamental Human Rights, as defined in the European Union and elsewhere

Those pesky Europeans have been a thorn in the American record. ¬†movie and software industries’ sides for decades, once forcing Microsoft to unbundle Internet Explorer from Windows as it was deemed anti-competitive. ¬†So the decision that sharing is a Human Right will have far reaching consequences. ¬†¬†

Be careful interpreting this verdict as a free-for-all. It‚Äôs not. What it says is that violating the copyright monopoly laws is not enough for a conviction, and that the copyright monopoly laws collide with Human Rights. Those are two huge wins in themselves. But it doesn‚Äôt mean nobody will ever get convicted for sharing culture again ‚Äď just that courts have to justify why a conviction is also ‚Äúnecessary in a democratic society‚ÄĚ,¬†in addition¬†to having met the normal and previous bar for a conviction.

When laws collide, the most basic fundamental Human Rights tend to trump all others.  So this lays the groundwork for a process where Copyright is eroded over the next number of decades we we come to terms with a society where copying and sharing is as natural an act as breathing.

In closing, rick says¬†(The phrase “sharing culture” means, music, books, movies, etc — Pete)

This means that people can no longer get convicted for violating the copyright monopoly alone. The court just declared it illegal for any court in [the] Europe[an Union] to convict somebody for breaking the copyright monopoly law when sharing culture, only on the merits of breaking the law.

A court that tries somebody for violating the copyright monopoly must now also show that a conviction is necessary to defend democracy itself in order to convict. This is a considerably higher bar to meet.

I am happy to see that people persecuted for sharing culture and knowledge all over Europe got this quite strong judicial decision in their back. I’d love to see the copyright industry lobby try to make a case why it is necessary to defend democracy to convict a single mother of three who shared pop songs.

 

Via: falkvinge.net

  • kohibruce

    A great mega decision.

    • http://www.whaleoil.co.nz/ Petal

      Isn’t it just? Will he one day be seen as a freedom fighter?

      • unitedtribes

        He is a freedom fighter

        • http://www.whaleoil.co.nz/ Petal

          “be seen as” not same as “is”. Right now, he is a huge enabler for Copyright rights holders’ property getting distributed far and wide. If the law changes, fine, but let’s not kid ourselves here.

  • 4077th

    Mr Dot Con will be laughing all the way to Deutsche Bundasbank..That in itself pisses me off BUT I think the ruling is a sensible one.

    • parorchestia

      Is it sensible? There are many actions that are reserved for selected groups – courts for example. How would our overpaid judiciary react to an entrepreneur setting up a quicker and cheaper justice system, all in the name of human rights?

  • Mr_Blobby

    One small set back for big corporations one giant leap for the little man.

    Won’t sway the brought and paid for US administration.

10%