Timothy B. Lee at Ars Technica reveals
The [US] courts have traditionally allowed the police to inspect any items a suspect is carrying when they arrest him or her. But in the past, the information the police could obtain in this fashion was fairly limited. The advent of the smartphone has changed all that. ¬†
A new document uncovered by the ACLU provides insight into just how aggressive law enforcement agencies have become about obtaining the contents of seized cell phones. Last fall, writes the ACLU’s Chris Soghoian, “officers from Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) seized an iPhone from the bedroom of a suspect in a drug investigation.”
A¬†document¬†filed in court shows that police extracted a wealth of personal information from the device, including call records, contacts, stored text messages, photos, videos, and passwords. They also obtained “659 geolocation points, including 227 cell towers and 403 Wi-Fi networks with which the cell phone had previously connected”‚ÄĒa detailed record of where the device had been in previous weeks. Soghoian says law enforcement agencies can buy portable devices that extract this kind of information from smartphones in a matter of minutes.
I don’t like the idea of anyone having access to ¬†my smartphone contents, and the police better have a warrant.
It is a complete picture of my life, and provides access to historical data that should have more protection that simply being arrested on suspicion of, anything.
Should Police automatically have access to everything on a phone, merely at the first contact?
While acquiring such a massive volume of data without a warrant may fit the letter of the law, it certainly seems to violate the spirit of the Fourth Amendment. Until recently, no one would have had that much personal information in their pockets. Such records, if they existed at all, would have been in the suspect’s home, where the police couldn’t seize it without a warrant.
Unfortunately, law enforcement groups have resisted efforts to enhance cell phone privacy in these situations.
Some legal decisions are coming from US where the Police need a warrant if access to the phone is restricted with a password. ¬†But that’s still a lame protection. ¬†It would be similar to not needing a warrant to enter and search your home as long as they found a door unlocked.
What does your smartphone reveal about you? ¬†And what, if anything, are you doing to protect your data if it was to fall in the wrong hands?