UK Bloggers unite to oppose botched Leveson reforms

UK bloggers from across the political spectrum have united and written a letter in the Guardian opposing the extent of the Leveson reforms.

This is a classic case, especially for the left wing bloggers of being careful what you wish for…they were all baying for the blood of Murdoch and didn’t focus on what regulation can actually mean.

The same is happening in Australia now…where the scale and scope of “reforms” and “regulation” are actually a direct attack on freedoms we all enjoy.

The Leveson inquiry was set up to address “the culture, practices and ethics of the press, including contacts between the press and politicians and the press and the police” (Comment, 19 March). Our views diverge on whether the outcome of the Leveson process – and the plans for a new regulator – are the best way forward. But where we all agree is that current attempts at regulating blogs and other small independent news websites are critically flawed. 

The government has defined a “relevant publisher” for the purposes of press regulation in a way that seeks to draft campaign groups and community-run websites covering neighbourhood planning applications and local council affairs into a regulator designed for the Guardian, Sun and Daily Mail. Even the smallest of websites will be threatened with the stick of punitive “exemplary damages” if they fall foul of a broad range of torts, encompassing everything from libel to “breach of confidence”. The authors of these proposals should reflect on their remarkable achievement of uniting both Tom Watson and Rupert Murdoch in opposition.

This appears to be the outcome of a botched late-night drafting process and complete lack of consultation with bloggers, online journalists and social media users, who may now be caught in regulations which trample on grassroots democratic activity and Britain’s emerging digital economy. Leveson was meant to be focused on the impact of “big media”. In the end it may come to be seen as a damaging attack on Britain’s blogosphere, which rather than being a weakness in British politics, has proved time and time again that it is a real strength.

We will all continue to write, campaign, cajole, amuse and irritate online. But we consider the current proposals a fundamental threat to doing just that.
Mark Ferguson LabourList
Tim Montgomerie ConservativeHome
Stephen Tall LibDemVoice
Laurence Durnan Political Scrapbook
Paul Staines Editor, Guido Fawkes’ Blog
Harry Cole News Editor, Guido Fawkes’ Blog
Alex Wickham Reporter, Guido Fawkes’ Blog
Sunny Hundal Liberal Conspiracy
Jag Singh Messagespace
Neal Lawson Compass
Nick Pickles Director, Big Brother Watch
Jim Killock Executive director, Open Rights Group
Emma Burnell Scarlet Standard
Adam Bienkov
Luke Akehurst
James Bloodworth Left Foot Forward
Jon Lansman Leftfutures

  • thor42

    Bwahahahaha……….. :)

    Looks like the “law of unintended consequences” has struck again.

    • Mediaan

      Unintended? Extremely intended, I would say. Botched? No, it wasn’t botched at all.

      Anyway, events have overtaken them. They could have saved themselves the trouble, because teachers are doing it for them. The push towards stupidity has done splendid work.

      Hardly anyone reads, of those that can read. The audio and video channels are so flooded with idiocy, only a few would learn anything socially undesirable from them. And their attention span is extremely short, so any point taken in would soon be replaced with more idiocy.

      The few like me who still read books and periodicals, and still express opinions, will soon all be dead or dealt with.

  • Patrick

    One good thing to come out of last week’s shenanigans in Australia is Gillard had to drop most of the reforms due to not having the numbers. This was overshadowed by the Rudd v Gillard non event. Cannot help but think Gillard must read the Helen Clarke playbook aka her electoral reform act which was so similar in trying to restrict the media.

0%