This is a classic case, especially for the left wing bloggers of being careful what you wish for…they were all baying for the blood of Murdoch and didn’t focus on what regulation can actually mean.
The same is happening in Australia now…where the scale and scope of “reforms” and “regulation” are actually a direct attack on freedoms we all enjoy.
TheÂ Leveson inquiryÂ was set up to address “the culture, practices and ethics of the press, including contacts between the press and politicians and the press and the police” (Comment, 19 March). Our views diverge on whether the outcome of the Leveson process â€“ and the plans for a new regulator â€“ are the best way forward. But where we all agree is that current attempts at regulating blogs and other small independent news websites are critically flawed.Â
The government has defined a “relevant publisher” for the purposes of press regulation in a way that seeks to draft campaign groups and community-run websites covering neighbourhood planning applications and local council affairs into a regulator designed for the Guardian, Sun and Daily Mail. Even the smallest of websites will be threatened with the stick of punitive “exemplary damages” if they fall foul of a broad range of torts, encompassing everything from libel to “breach of confidence”. The authors of these proposals should reflect on their remarkable achievement of uniting both Tom Watson and Rupert Murdoch in opposition.
This appears to be the outcome of a botched late-night drafting process and complete lack of consultation with bloggers, online journalists and social media users, who may now be caught in regulations which trample on grassroots democratic activity and Britain’s emerging digital economy. Leveson was meant to be focused on the impact of “big media”. In the end it may come to be seen as a damaging attack on Britain’s blogosphere, which rather than being a weakness in British politics, has proved time and time again that it is a real strength.
We will all continue to write, campaign, cajole, amuse and irritate online. But we consider the current proposals a fundamental threat to doing just that.
Mark FergusonÂ LabourList
Tim MontgomerieÂ ConservativeHome
Stephen TallÂ LibDemVoice
Laurence DurnanÂ Political Scrapbook
Paul StainesÂ Editor,Â Guido Fawkes’ Blog
Harry ColeÂ News Editor, Guido Fawkes’ Blog
Alex WickhamÂ Reporter, Guido Fawkes’ Blog
Sunny HundalÂ Liberal Conspiracy
Jag SinghÂ Messagespace
Neal LawsonÂ Compass
Nick PicklesÂ Director,Â Big Brother Watch
Jim KillockÂ Executive director,Â Open Rights Group
Emma BurnellÂ Scarlet Standard
James BloodworthÂ Left Foot Forward
Jon LansmanÂ Leftfutures