Some¬†really have no idea what they’re doing
Some¬†really have no idea what they’re doing
I really don’t think they ever envisaged this
Via Ian Griffin / Twitter. ¬†Otago Harbour this morning
Good Evening, welcome¬†to the daily Whaleoil Backchat.
You don‚Äôt have to stay ‚Äúon topic‚ÄĚ in these posts like you do in all others. Feel free to share your own stories, links to other news or catch up with friends. If you haven‚Äôt tried it before, signing in to a Disqus account is free, quick, and it is easy.
New commenters should familiarise themselves with our¬†Commenting and Moderation rules. Thank you.
Trouble¬†commenting¬†on Whaleoil? You can receive free help.
Just email¬†[email protected]¬†with your concerns. ¬†Please¬†be polite and as precise as you can be. ¬†Remember: this is a volunteer service provided by other Whaleoil readers. ¬†Only contact them with commenting related problems.
Radio NZ is reporting that one charter school has completed their first Education Review Office report with flying colours.
The first Education Review Office report on a charter school has been made public.
South Auckland Middle School has distributed the report, which is positive about the publicly-funded private school.
The report says the school has made a good start and its students are responding well to their teachers’ high expectations. ¬† Read more »
Once everything is out in the open, it will be clear that Dirty Politics was part of a much larger¬†criminal conspiracy.
The involvement in this is so wide-ranging that it surprises me that the Greens and TV3 have revived the issue by putting pressure on John Key in the house and then, of course, whipping it into a storm in the ‘media’
The Prime Minister has had the heat put on him by Opposition parties about his relationship with Whale Oil blogger Cameron Slater during the first question time since the Dirty Politics book was published.
Green Party co-leader Russel Norman led the attack on John Key, asking him how many times he had spoken to or sent text messages to Slater since November 2008.
“None in my capacity as Prime Minister,” Mr Key replied.
“I think it’s been well-established in this House for a long period of time that Prime Ministers wear a variety of different hats ‚Äď that includes as leader of the National Party, and can include as a citizen.
“I happen, for the record, to use my ministerial service-funded cellphone to ring my wife. When I ring my darling wife and I put the cat out at night, I do that in my capacity as a husband, not as Prime Minister.”
Investigative journalist Nicky Hager’s book, released in August, drew connections between Slater and a National Party staff members and Ministers.
The book says Slater was fed information from National Party sources to use in attack posts on his blog.
The book has no proof. ¬†Only inferences. ¬†That doesn’t stop the media from pretending it is hard fact.
I don’t think they really do.
Green Party co-leader Metiria Turei acknowledged in notes for a speech to Parliament today that many of the party’s supporters – and even those who did not vote for the Greens – would like them to have more influence at the table.
“Since the election I’ve received a number of letters, even from National Party members, pleading with us to from some kind of arrangement with National because they feel guilty about voting for a party with such a poor record on the environment.
“The idea apparently is that the Greens could act as some kind of foil to National’s anti-environmental agenda if only we just focused on environmental issues.”
But Turei said the Greens were a movement based not just on environmental principles but on the principles of social justice and democracy.
“This is who we are. We couldn’t stop caring about our environment, or our people, or our economic direction for that matter because it might be politically expedient to do so. It’s not our job to move to the centre; it’s to move the centre.” Read more »
First they came for our dogs and I said nothing because I didn’t have a dog.
Then they came for our cats and I said nothing because I didn’t like cats.
Then they came for our education system and I said nothing because I didn’t have children.
Then they imposed Sharia Law and I said nothing because I was a woman and my place was under a Burqa.
A US court has found Arab Bank guilty of aiding and abetting terrorism for helping launder Hamas money and helping to finance acts of terror.
A U.S. jury on Monday found Arab Bank Plc liable for providing material support to Hamas and said it must compensate victims of two dozen attacks attributed to the Islamic militant group in Israel and the Palestinian territories.
Jurors needed less than two days of deliberations to reach their verdict after a six-week trial in Brooklyn federal court, which lawyers described as the first terrorism financing civil case to reach trial in the United States.
A trial on damages will be held later. Similar lawsuits are pending in New York against Bank of China Ltd, which is accused of providing services to Palestine Islamic Jihad, and Credit Lyonnais SA, which is accused of aiding Hamas. Those banks have denied the respective allegations.
Nearly 300 Americans who were either victims or related to victims of attacks linked to Hamas had sued Arab Bank in 2004.
They accused the Jordanian bank of violating the Anti-Terrorism Act, a law that lets victims of U.S.-designated foreign terrorist organizations such as Hamas seek damages.
“It has been a long haul,” said plaintiff Maida Averbach, 76, who said her son was paralyzed from the neck down in a 2003 suicide bombing and died in 2010 from complications. “Unfortunately my Steve isn’t here.” Averbach spoke to reporters by phone.
Arab Bank said it would appeal. In a statement, the bank said the verdict “comes as no surprise” after a series of what it considered legally incorrect court rulings that kept it from mounting a proper defense, and effectively “put Hamas on trial.”
The bank also said the verdict exposes banks such as itself to “enormous liability” for providing routine banking services.
Shand Stephens, a lawyer for Arab Bank, predicted that the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals “is going to reverse this.”
Mark Werbner, a lawyer for some of the plaintiffs, said the verdict sends a message that “when a bank opens its doors to terrorists, they’re going to be held accountable.”