Moody time-lapsed clouds

Tagged:

Pick the alpha male (hint: it’s not the guy)

Tagged:

Daily roundup

fsfd

Mr and Mrs TarnBabe67 appear to have a similar lower mandible deficit compensated for by an additional fold of under-facial tergum.

Read more »

Whaleoil Backchat

Good Evening, welcome to the daily Whaleoil Backchat.

You don‚Äôt have to stay ‚Äúon topic‚ÄĚ in these posts like you do in all others. Feel free to share your own stories, links to other news or catch up with friends. If you haven‚Äôt tried it before, signing in to a Disqus account is free, quick, and it is easy.

New commenters should familiarise themselves with our Commenting and Moderation rules. Thank you.

 


Trouble commenting on Whaleoil? You can receive free help.

Just email¬†whaleoil-helpdesk@[email protected]¬†with your concerns. ¬†Please¬†be polite and as precise as you can be. ¬†Remember: this is a volunteer service provided by other Whaleoil readers. ¬†Only contact them with commenting related problems.

Tagged:

The essential problem with Green (and left) messages

Check this out

dqwdqew

How does that pass your BS detector? ¬† Not only do these people want you to believe that half of all the earth’s species have become extinct since 1970, they also use an image of a lion – an animal we all know has been extinct for some time.

Why do they do this?

Why is it that the left completely oversell their messages? ¬†It’s simply not effective. ¬†They lost an election because of it too. ¬†Nobody believed the extremes that they were selling to every day New Zealanders.

The question is:   Do they oversell on purpose, or have they started to believe their own doomsday scenarios?

Let’s say this is even true. ¬†Is it bad? ¬†It sounds bad… ¬†but is it? Read more »

The month that was the election month – how did Whaleoil do?

Hey, now the elections are over, thanks for sticking around. ¬†Not surprisingly, September 2014 was a good ¬†month. ¬†Let’s tear into it.

ddasd

Read more »

Four terms or Five?

David Farrar didn’t believe that National could entertain winning four terms, but the scale of the defeat of the left has forced him to re-evaluate this thinking.

I had even mentally drafted a blog post intended for the day after the election, in case of a National victory, in which somewhat somberly I would have stated that while it is great National got a third term, MPs should realise that this is probably their last term in Government. The post would have been about how they need to secure the policy gains of the last six years, so as many of them as possible can’t be reversed, and also how if they can go into opposition with a relatively solid vote, then maybe there will be just two terms in opposition.

The nature of the election result has changed that. A fourth, or even a fifth term, is now a very credible possibility. I’m not saying a probability, but definitely a credible possibility. Here’s why:

  1. National’s 48% is the sort of result you get in your first term, not your last term
  2. The left vote totalled just 36%, and they need to grow this by 12% if they want to be able to govern, without being dependent on what Winston may decide
  3. The Conservatives could well make 5% in 2017, giving National an extra buffer
  4. John Key is now very likely to contest the 2017 election. Previously I would have said it was 60/40 at best.
  5. Labour’s leadership battle is turning off the public, and may leave the party divided and wrecked

I thought like Farrar.

If National won it was likely to be a narrow victory, with few partners and ¬†the left on the rise I though John Key would jack it in and go out as a winning PM rather than risk being turfed out. Now I am certain that the next election is a certain victory for National, perhaps with some support partners. John Key will now look to best Keith Holyoake’s record and win a fourth term and cement his place in history. Holyoake¬†served just under 12 years as PM therefore the winning of a fourth term means that John Key would easily pass that record. Key is now fast approaching the records of Helen Clark (8¬†years, 350¬†days ),Edward Stafford (8 years, 326 days), Robert Muldoon (8¬†years, 227¬†days ), Sid Holland (7¬†years, 281¬†days), Joseph Ward (7 years, 38 days), and Jim Bolger (7¬†years, 36¬†days), which will all fall this term.¬† Read more »

Labour’s issues, comparing rebuilds, 2002 vs 2014

Liam Hehir writes at the Manawatu Standard about the pressing issues facing Labour¬†as they seek to attempt to rebuild after Cunliffe’s disastrous campaign.

And, of course, there was National’s 2002 catastrophe. It is hard to believe that the party now straddling the political centre like the Colossus of Rhodes received just 20.93 per cent of the vote that year. How has it managed to claw back its status as the natural party of government?

First, National eliminated its competition on the Right. Under Don Brash, National gobbled up almost the whole conservative vote, reducing ACT and UnitedFuture to the lifeless husks they are today. NZ First also barely survived this process as about half of its traditionalist voters defected back to National.

While that restored National’s formidability, the 2005 election proved that it wasn’t quite enough to carve out a workable majority. It then fell to the pragmatic and non-ideological John Key to seize back the centre ground. His ability to do this – bringing both conservative and centrist voters with him – has proved essential to his success as a popular leader.

At the same time, National relentlessly modernised and adapted on an organisational level. Party headquarters provides constant information and co-ordination to candidates and exercises effective quality control over campaigns. No National candidate would have been permitted to neglect the party vote as Labour candidates have in the past two elections.

Read more »

Meme/Caption/Photoshop contest

ewrwqe

You know what to do Рjust stick within the moderation and commenting standards please.  Make your own here and share the results in comments.

Read more »

We need a name for Labour’s leadership debacle

I was thinking that we need a name for Labour’s leadership debacle.

The media would come up with something really lame and probably stick a -gate on the end of it.

I think my readers are smarter than the media so it is over to you to come up with some descriptors.

I was initially thinking of c*ntastrophe  РA completely avoidable and utterly F*CKED situation caused by a certifiable Bitch or C*nt.

But that is perhaps a little harsh, even though it is highly accurate.

Are there any others you can think of?

Put your suggestions in the comments, please use * where necessary…there will be light moderation to save what remains of Pete’s hair and the other mods.

Here are a couple more:

Clusterliffe – term for an operation in which multiple things have gone wrong. Related to “SNAFU” (Situation Normal, All F*cked Up”) and “FUBAR” (F*cked Up Beyond All Repair). ¬† Read more »

Tagged: