Reader content: Have you put your family history down on paper?

I came across this the other day and thought it is apt as we think about the part our ancestors played in WW1

No person can know another person, especially a child about his parents. They were another generation, a different world. Even in families where there’s a tradition of reminiscing, where children hear stories about their parent’s own childhood and youth, volumes must be left untold. There have to be things they owned, cherished or feared, things they did, that will go the graves with them, things that their children will never know. Not necessarily because it was deliberately kept from them, but simply because it was never told, never recorded. Because of forgetfulness, lack of opportunity or because there was never enough time, these things pass out of memory, out of existence. It’s impossible to convey the whole of any person from one generation to the next, even if you wanted to. (David L. Lindsey)

As a young adult I didn’t pay much attention to my heritage I had too many other things going on with my life. Recently I have become more aware and want to know more about what happened with my family in the past. This interest has been spurred on partly due to what other people have written on this blog about their family history.   Read more »

State Schools Cost 500% More to Set-up than Charter Schools

The Press in Christchurch have the details of a new school being developed in Rolleston. The cost is $53 million to set up and then high costs per student through until 2021 when it may finally become full – after starting with a projected 225 students in 2017.
You would expect the Left to be sreaming about cost in a situation like this but Labour and its teacher union allies (PPTA/NZEI) are desperately trying to protect their patch from Charter Schools and one claim is that the Charters are more expensive. The Charter schools get approximately $1 million to set up per 200 students. Rolleston is getting approximately $5 million per 200 students. All State schools currently being developed are in that price range.

Read more »

Reader content: Andrew Little to meet with Thomas Piketty

I note that Little Angry Andy is this week meeting Thomas Piketty the French economist and author of “Capital in the Twenty-First Century”, which is a best seller and tome on which the progressives will be banging their fists as their bible for years to come if the hype surrounding it is anything to go by,

Picketty relies on economic data going back 250 years to show that an ever-rising concentration of wealth is not self-correcting.

“Piketty’s solution to preventing this dystopian future is to tax the rich fiercely. He favors progressive income and inheritance taxes with rates as high as 80 percent and a progressive annual tax on wealth levied globally to prevent the owners from fleeing the confiscation.”  (link)

You can see where this is going with NZ’s regressive left lead by Little and why he is joining the race to Picketty’s door to speak to the man himself.

Pickettys 700-page tome has provided something of a clarion call for the “progressives” and as as Stephanie Kelton, chair of the Department of Economics at the University of Missouri-Kansas City explains in the context of the Occupy rallies against capitalism. They will say: “The left was right. The wealthy owed their fortunes to their forefathers and the Congressman who wrote the loopholes for their tax accountants to exploit. It’s a conclusion that confirmed many priors, which probably explains much of its success.”

“In the simplest version of the Piketty model” explains Tyler Cowen
(professor of economics at George Mason University), “wealth grows more quickly than does the economy as a whole and thus the picture changes. The relative losers are no longer low earners but rather anyone who is not a capitalist. Any disparity is due not to their shortcomings in labor markets but rather to their lack of a high initial endowment.” Read more »

Dirty Media – Herald Admits Making S##t Up

Screenshot 2015-04-26 at 22.49.32

Which part of “we made it all up” haven’t the Herald said here?

Whaleoil General Debate

Good morning. The Whaleoil General Debate posts appear at 7 am and 6 pm (Backchat). You don’t have to stay “on topic” in these posts like you do in all others. Feel free to share your own stories, links to other news or catch up with friends. If you haven’t tried it before, signing in to a Disqus account is free, quick, and it is easy.

Commenters should familiarise themselves with our Commenting and Moderation rules. Thank you.


Trouble commenting on Whaleoil? Read this first. You can receive free help. Do not email via the Contact Page.

Just email [email protected] with your concerns.  Please be polite and as precise as you can be.  Remember: this is a unpaid volunteer service provided by other Whaleoil readers.  Only contact them with commenting related problems.

Today in History

"Attack on Derna"On this day, in 1805, United States Marines, under the command of Lt Presley O’Bannon, attacked the Tripolitan city of Derne, in what is now Libya.

Read more »

Face of the day

1430019318234

SBS presenter Scott McIntyre PHOTO-smh.com.au

Today’s face of the day has been sacked for exercising his right to freedom of speech. I do not agree that he should be sacked for saying what he said. If it is okay to do that to him it makes it okay for it to be done to us when we express a different view to that of our employers.

I will note however that he had signed a social media policy which I am not privy to. If it did make it clear that this kind of thing was unacceptable while employed by them then that is a different matter as it was his choice to accept those terms when he took the job.

He has the right to say things that are offensive and we have the right to mock him or disagree with him. That is what Freedom of Speech means. A contract with his employer specifically about the use of Social Media however, complicates the matter.

Read more »

Word of the day

The word for today is…

demesne (noun) – 1. Law Possession and use of one’s own land.
2. Manorial land retained for the private use of a feudal lord.
3. The grounds belonging to a mansion or country house.
4. An extensive piece of landed property; an estate.
5. A district; a territory.
6. A realm; a domain.

Source : The Free Dictionary

Etymology : circq 1300, demeyne (modern spelling by late 15c.), from Anglo-French demesne, demeine, Old French demaine “land held for a lord’s own use,” from Latin dominicus “belonging to a master,” from dominus “lord.” Re-spelled by Anglo-French legal scribes under influence of Old French mesnie “household” (and the concept of a demesne as “land attached to a mansion”) and their fondness for inserting -s- before -n-.

Daily Proverb

Proverbs 26

15Lazy people take food in their hand but don’t even lift it to their mouth.

Sunday nightCap