Rodney Hide slays a few lefty myths…like the existence of child poverty in New Zealand.
Leftists and troughers are working overtime to make child poverty the new reason for funding them and centralising control.
Their catchcry is 250,000 children living in poverty. Their problem is if it were true we would notice.
We know what child poverty looks like. Many of us have witnessed it overseas. All of us have seen it on TV. We donâ€™t see it in New Zealand.
We see children neglected, for sure, and that makes us both angry and sad. But we blame the parents, not poverty. And, if personal responsibility makes us squeamish, we blame welfare for three generations of dysfunctional and non-existent parenting. Itâ€™s been public policy for years to sponsor child neglect.
Nonetheless the â€śchild povertyâ€ť drums are beating. I was made aware of just how hard by the NZ Initiativeâ€™s weekly newsletter reporting classic journalistic over-egging and UN propagandising.
The UN should but out, and start preparing a defence against their global warming scam.
Fairfaxâ€™s Stuff.co.nz reported last week that Unicef had â€śslammed progressâ€ť on child poverty in New Zealand.
Really? I didnâ€™t believe it and on your behalf put myself through the agony of reading yet another UN rubbish report. It doesnâ€™t â€śslam progressâ€ť on child poverty. That news was made up.
All the UN report says about New Zealand is that along with the UK and US, we were â€śmoderately affectedâ€ť by the â€śGreat Recession,â€ť that our big change in the family benefit system was in 2012 to institute a â€śhigher rate but lower income ceilingâ€ť and we are reported as middling along in various charts supposedly showing us where we fit in the child poverty stakes.
The news report is puffed out with various child poverty warriors beating the drum and Prime Minister John Key having to defend the governmentâ€™s record against the false accusation that the UN had â€śslammed progress.â€ť Such is the state of news reporting in New Zealand today.
If you ever needed a sign in 2014 that your party needs rejuvenation, it’s your deputy leader telling the press that “The 1980s were much worse” [for Labour].
Labour’s caucus met [yesterday]Â and its former leader David Cunliffe resigned while David Parker was elevated from deputy leader to acting leader with Annette King as his deputy.
Ms King denied it was the most torrid time faced by Labour in her experience.
“The 1980s were much worse,” she said.
“Whenever there is a loss by a party there is going to be a time of turbulence. I have to say I’ve been there and seen that before. We will get through it, and we will come out of it and will be a strong party. This isn’t a permanent position.”
Mr Parker said he and Ms King – “the grandmother of the party now” – were chosen because they could offer stability and impartiality in the interim.
Seriously, when you have a grandmother of the party, you’re screwed. Â This may not even be a two-term fix. Â This may end up being a three term fix. Â Read more »
Labour’s leadership battle is shaping up to be an epic re-run of the battle scenes in 300.
Blood and guts everywhere.
It’s going to be awesome.
David Shearer and Phil Goff are completely ignoring Cunliffe’s instructions not to talk to the media. This is war! pic.twitter.com/6se8zagpzS
â€” Andrea Vance (@avancenz) September 22, 2014
Iain Lees-Galloway is a hypocrite as well as a stenographer rooter.
This was his facebook post.
Iain Lees-Galloway MP
5 hrsÂ Â·
What I find most depressing about National’s response to Dirty Politics is that they think it is politics as usual. It’s not, or at least, it doesn’t need to be. NZ has a proud history of open, transparent and relatively clean politics. This venture into American-style attack campaigns is unbecoming and hopefully the recent debate will help keep a lid on it.
Yet he is as guilty as anyone of dirty politics as well as being a dirty rooting ratbag.
Palmerston North MP Iain Lees-Galloway says he has learned a political lesson after being caught up in the Labour Partyâ€™s polling controversy.
Mr Lees-Galloway recruited volunteers for the polling and was in the room when senior MP Rick Barker advised using a phony company name and false personal names if that would make the volunteers feel more confident. Read more »
David Cunliffe aka The Cunliffe, isn’t as popular as Greg Presland thinks he is.
In fact the Fairfax Ipsos polls shows that Labour would do better without him.
Labour would get an immediate lift in the polls if it dumped leader David Cunliffe, a new poll suggests.
The stuff.co.nz/Ipsos poll reveals that Cunliffe may have become Labour’s biggest liability, with a significant number of voters saying they would be more likely to vote for Labour if someone else were leader.
ClickÂ hereÂ for full poll results in graphics.
The effect is sizeable, making a 13.5 percentage point difference to Labour’s vote.
Although a similar effect is seen on National when asked the same question about John Key, it is much smaller.
The finding will plunge Labour further into crisis after yesterday’s poll result cementing Labour’s support in the mid-20s.
Privately, Labour and the Greens now acknowledge that it would take an unprecedented swing against National to force a change of government on September 20.
Some Labour MPs were yesterday privately canvassing leadership options, even at this late stage.
But they believe Labour would be even more severely punished by such an outward sign of panic. Â Â Read more »
I see Phil Goff thinks that the government is ducking for cover over the Malaysian diplomat incident:
The Government has gone to ground in response to the woman at the centre of the Malaysian diplomat scandal speaking out and saying Foreign Affairs Minister Murray McCully should resign.
Mr McCully is en route to Europe and Prime Minister John Key is out of the country on a break.
The acting Prime Minister Bill English also did not want to comment.
“They’re absolutely ducking for cover,” says Labour MP Phil Goff.
Brooke Sabin was probably still in school when a certain incident happened at Darren Hughes landlady’s house in Hataitai.
Wasn’t it Phil Goff who tried to cover up Darren Hughes little incident at his landlady’s house for almost two weeks until Jonathan Marshall flewÂ down to Wellington and busted the case wide open? Why yes it was.Â Read more »
Laura McQuillanÂ at ZB reports:
National can’t get enough of talking about Trevor Mallard – as it gives its best crack to winning his Hutt South seat.
Steven Joyce says it’s one of four “strategic” Labour-held electorates National’s targeting.
“Labour can’t get Trevor Mallard to retire, maybe we can, and that would be a huge public service.”
Mr Mallard also rated a mention as Judith Collins listed Hutt Valley crime stats.
“Violent crime is down by 20%, it could be because Trevor Mallard’s been busy elsewhere.”
Trevor Mallard’s laughing off the remarks.
“I think there’s a fair bit of obsession with me both on Steven and Judith’s part – but I think it’s probably a bit of a compliment really.”
Meanwhile, National’s gunning for four Labour-held electorates – if not to win, then to improve its share of the party vote. Read more »
Labour in the UK is in dreadful trouble with a lacklustreÂ leader who is highly rated, by himself mostly.
Last Friday, Ed Milibandâ€™s team assembled to review the previous dayâ€™s launch of the â€śCondition of Britainâ€ť report from the IPPR think tank, which Miliband had enthusiastically embraced. The morning papers were dominated by Englandâ€™s World Cup defeat at the hands of Uruguay, but what coverage there was gave the Labour leaderâ€™s aides cause for concern. â€śNo oneâ€™s out there backing us up,â€ť observed one of his press advisers sombrely.
Although the speech had been heavily trailed in advance, the rest of the shadow cabinet were conspicuous by their absence. With the exception of Rachel Reeves, who holds the welfare brief, few of Milibandâ€™s colleagues appeared keen publicly to endorse his tough new line on benefits.
â€śWell, what did they expect,â€ť one bemused shadow cabinet member told me. â€śHeâ€™s spent the past four years telling everyone: ‘Iâ€™m going to stand up to the Tories on welfare.â€™ Then he suddenly says: ‘Actually, you know what, Iâ€™m not.â€™ And he expects everyone to come running?â€ť
As Ed Miliband is painfully aware, no one is planning to do so. Which is why his office had to spend the rest of Friday ringing round, drumming up support for their beleaguered boss in the weekend papers. Reeves, Chuka Umunna and Tristram Hunt duly emerged to issue supportive statements, along with Neil Kinnock, who was â€“ bizarrely â€“ sent out to rebut the charge that Miliband was turning intoâ€¦ Neil Kinnock.
One person who did not issue a supportive statement, of course, was the shadow chancellor, Ed Balls. Indeed, over the past few weeks, rumours have started to circulate in the corridors of Westminster that Balls is â€śon manoeuvresâ€ť. â€śHeâ€™s up to something,â€ť MPs have been whispering to one another, in conspiratorial tones.