After 9/11 and Flight 93 we learned that you can fight back against terrorists…after Colorado many people including commenters on this blog think hat the people in the cinema were just hapless victims unable to fight back. However that is not the case:
Ari Armstrong and his father Linn offer tips on how can you might safely respond if you’re ever unlucky enough to find yourself in a mass-shooting incident—and can keep a sufficiently cool head.
A comparison I considered is to flights after 9/11. After that, Americans just decided that they weren’t going to let hijackers have their way, anymore. I frankly think that mindset has done far more than anything TSA has done to deter would-be hijackers. Everybody knows the story of Flight 93. Now that Americans expect hijackers to try to kill them, rather than negotiate for political goals, I think we’ve pretty much decided to do whatever it takes to take down hijackers as quickly as possible.
But there doesn’t seem to have been a similar widespread mental change when it comes to on-the-ground terror. A message at the ACT web site currently states, “Duck and cover does not work. A theater full of people CAN take down a shooter and save lives. More people need to know how to prevent and respond to Active Shooters to prevent future tragedies.” That approach makes a lot of sense to me, and I hope it’s something that individual citizens, as well as law-enforcement agencies, seriously consider over the coming weeks and months. (Please note that ACT has not endorsed or approved the video of my interview with my dad.)
My dad makes several points, including these:
* Obviously if it’s possible to safely leave a dangerous area, do so (as a civilian).
* A group of people can disorient an attacker by pummeling him with objects at hand.
* With appropriate training, a few people near an attacker can take him to the ground and incapacitate him.