capital gains tax

Labour intend to resurrect capital gains tax after they win the election

In an interview with Richard Harman, Phil Twyford indicated the CGT is still in play

There is a critical missing policy in Labour’s suite of housing announcements made over the weekend.

Though the policies would extend the current bright line test to apply income tax on the resale of homes from within two to within five years, it stops short of a full capital gains tax.

However, it is not off the table.

Housing spokesperson Phil Twyford told POLITIK last night that Labour would reconvene the tax working group once it was in Government.

“Grant Robertson’s position has been that he’s not going to rule anything out,” said Mr Twyford.

“All options will be on the table for tax reform.”

So, the cowards intend to set up a “working party” after the election, and then have that magically recommend CGT, at which time Labour will invoke the “thorough consultation” mantra and push it through.  Read more »

After slamming the government Robbo, with his next breath, says Labour will increase taxes

As I said previously Grant Robertson knows as much about finance as Jacinda Ardern does about child rearing.

After slamming the government over tax cuts in his next breath he announces Labour will fight the election proposing tax increases.

Labour is planning to announce tax increases before the next election to help fund its spending plans but will leave the detailed work until it is in government.

Their spending promises are shaping up to be massive. Billions upon billions, and the only way they can fund that is by stiffing us with tax increases.

In a pre-Budget speech to a business breakfast on Monday, Labour finance spokesman Grant Robertson said a Tax Working Group would be set up after the election to develop ways to correct the imbalances between the productive and speculative parts of the economy.

“While we want a comprehensive review there will be some interim steps that we will announce before the election … to ensure that we have the revenue to address pressing issues, particularly in health, education and housing,” he said.

“I think it’s only fair to New Zealand we go to the next election with some sense of the direction of our tax policy. We want the Tax Working Group to do the detailed work but I think it’s only fair for New Zealanders that they see the path we are on.

Read more »

The problem with Robbo’s UBI

Danyl McLauchlan writes:

I’m still having trouble imagining how a UBI would actually work. Comments on the previous posts were very informative, so please help me out some more. How would payments differ between:

  • An unemployed 18 year old living with their parents
  • An 18 year old living away from home studying at university
  • A single parent with three children under five
  • A parent with three children under five with a partner on a high income
  • A person suffering from a serious chronic illness preventing them from working in perpetuity

Or do they all get the same amount?

By its very name “Universal” it means they all get the same. Good luck to Labour with selling that policy.

But the problems just get worse and worse. Having Gareth Morgan rant and rave all over Facebook doesn’t really help your cause.

Labour has massive problems with policy and they can lay them at the feet of Andrew Little.   Read more »

Has the government shot itself in the foot with its “Bright-line” test?

I have come across something that more suitably qualified people might like to comment on. I think the government has created a “vote-losing” law inadvertently.

It is this new “Bright-line” law regarding housing sales.

I was talking to a chartered accountant and lawyer about it the other day.  It appears the government may have inadvertently created a problem whereby ANYONE making even a slight change to a trust is going to end up triggering a tax situation even though no real sale happens or money is involved.

The relevant law is Section GB 53 of the Income Tax Act 2007, below. The problem word is effect in 1(c) [underlined].

Section GB 53 says:

GB 53 Arrangements involving residential land: trusts

When this section applies

(1) This section applies when—

(a) the trustees of a trust own residential land directly or indirectly (trust residential land); and

(b) trust residential land makes up 50% or more, by market value, of the assets of the trust; and

(c) the trust’s trust deed changes, a decision-maker under the trust deed changes, or an arrangement under the trust changes, with a purpose or effect of defeating the intent and application of section CB 6A (Disposal within 2 years: bright-line test for residential land).   Read more »

Ben Carson proposes flat tax system

Republican Presidential candidate Ben Carson has come out proposing a flat tax system for the US.

Alex Swoyer at Breitbart reports:

GOP presidential candidate Dr. Ben Carson, whose campaign is adjusting to new aides in key positions, released Carson’s plan“for reforming America’s convoluted and systematically unfair tax code.”

“Liberty and fairness are bedrock principles of this great nation,” Carson says. “It’s time that our tax system reflected those ideals.”

My plan for a simple, fair and transparent flat tax will not only eliminate the onerous burdens the IRS places on taxpayers, but it will grow the economy. Everyone will be on the same footing, from the largest corporation to the local family business. No one will be able to hide from their tax burden, but neither will anyone be ruined by an incomprehensible tax code. A Carson administration will push Congress from Day One to implement this plan to revitalize our economy through fundamental, common-sense tax reform. We will take the power away from the IRS and put it back in the hands of “We The People.”

Read more »

A newspaper editorial on the housing debacle in Auckland

A newspaper has an editorial about the failure of the much vaunted housing accord.

It is disappointing, though no surprise, that after two years the Government’s “housing accord” with the Auckland Council has produced just 102 houses (of which it knows) in areas designated for faster building consents. When the accord was signed in October 2013, Auckland needed 39,000 houses in three years. This is the rate of building that will be needed to accommodate the region’s projected population increase over the next 25 years. At least 25,000 new houses should be built or nearing completion by now if the three-year target is to be met. The tally of 102 known to the council is pitiful.

But it is no surprise because the housing shortage in Auckland is not caused only by slow council consent procedures. The Productivity Commission has found a raft of other contributing problems, including the scale and capacity of the building industry in New Zealand. The council also points to the fact that when it does issue consents, there is no guarantee a house will be built. In fact, 2027 consents have been issued under the accord’s fast track and only 102 are known to have come to fruition so far.

Read more »

Labour still clueless as to what to do – start by throwing out the really wacky policies

Labour really are lost, they are cleaning out their dead wood policies and swallowing plenty of dead rats.

Some in Labour sure are going to have their vitriolic words thrown back at them, particularly the nasty comments they made over raising the retirement age which has now been dumped as a policy.

The Labour Party has officially dumped its policies to introduce a broad capital gains tax and raise the retirement age.

Steps to remove the two policies from the party’s policy platform were approved by delegates at the party’s conference today.

Labour leader Andrew Little would not rule out a comeback for the policies in the future, but said if it got into Government in 2017 it would not introduce them without campaigning on them again in a future election.

Read more »

Capital Gains Tax in effect as of today

A new brightline tax, that the government won’t label a capital gains tax, comes into effect today.

It will clamp down on low property speculators who currently don’t pay tax on their one-or-two property sell-ons a year.

It won’t make much of a difference to the tax paid by professional investors.

Auckland Property Investors Association president Andrew Bruce said there’s a few exceptions to the tax as well.

“If its your own home that is exempt, if the property is inherited there’s an exemption there – there are one or two other exemptions.”

Bruce said professional traders and developers will be paying tax already and won’t see much of a change.

He said its mainly people who are trying to cut corners. Read more »

The real reason why house prices are rising rapidly

Labour would have you believe that rising house prices is the fault of people with chinky sounding names.

They also say we need a capital gains tax and possibly a stamp duty and restrictions on those yellow investors to halt the rise of house prices.

Even John Key is reacting by suggesting that perhaps a non-resident withholding tax could be deployed.

But the problem won’t be solved with any of those “solutions”.

The ANZ Bank has some new research which gives some insight into the real causes of rising house prices…and it will frighten most politicians.

In a paper on housing affordability released on Friday, ANZ Research said it was low interest rates and cheap mortgages that were contributing to the rapid growth in house prices, particularly in Sydney, rather than tax policies like capital gains tax concessions or negative gearing.    Read more »

Same problems as here but…

A newspaper has an article about the problems facing potential house buyers in Australia:

Singles on an average income have no hope of quickly saving a deposit to buy their first home, particularly in Sydney.

Getting a deposit together quickly is probably unrealistic even for couples where both partners earn the average wage, unless their parents can help out with the deposit or act as a guarantor on the home loan, said Canstar finance editor Justine Davies.

“The percentage of salary that would need to be set aside to get into the housing market quickly is very unrealistic for most people.

“You might be able to do the hard yards for a couple of years and get a five to 10 per cent deposit but to try and to do that to achieve a 20 per cent deposit I think for most people is going to be unrealistic,” she said.

A Sydney couple on average wages would have to set aside 41 per cent of their net income to get a 5 per cent deposit together in a year, research from Canstar shows.   Read more »