The Greens are no good at economics or education or other things that matter to the general populace.
They turn to global warming as their scare story for the young to try and maintain a base.
The story is getting thinner and thinner with the Washington Post now declaring at the conclusion of their article:
To be sure, both sets of data points show an overall rise in temperature of +0.01C during the 2000s. But, if current trends¬†continue for just a few more years, then the mean change for the 2000s will shift to negative; in other words, the warming would really stop. The current +.01C increase in temperatures is insufficient to verify the climate change projections for major warming (even the low end +1-2C) by mid-to-late century. A¬†peer reviewed study in Nature Climate Change¬†published in 2013 drew the same conclusion: ‚ÄúRecent observed global warming is significantly less than that simulated by climate models,‚ÄĚ it says.
Time to pack up the hemp bags and get a real job.
Their article though begins with showing a chart…and not the usual hockey stick lie, rather a chart that shows we are cooling not warming.
An article in¬†Nature earlier this year¬†discusses¬†some of the possible causes for what some have to referred to as the global warming ‚Äúpause‚ÄĚ or ‚Äúhiatus‚ÄĚ. ¬†Explanations include the quietest solar cycle in over a hundred years, increases in Asian pollution, more effective oceanic heat absorption, and even volcanic activity. Indeed, a peer-reviewed¬†paper published in February¬†estimates that about 15 percent of the pause can be attributed to increased volcanism. But some have questioned whether the pause or¬†deceleration¬†is even occurring at all. ¬† Read more »