Jobless youngsters will be forced to pick up litter or carry out other community work if they want to receive benefits, David Cameron will say today.
In a major speech on Tory welfare plans, the Prime Minister will claim it is wrong for them to be allowed to go straight on to the dole.
He will pledge that a future Tory government will introduce mandatory community work for unemployed youngsters in order to instil the ‚Äėdiscipline of turning up for work each day‚Äô.
Mr Cameron said last night that making young people work for their dole would help them ‚Äėmake something of their lives‚Äô and ensure they gave something back to their community in return for ‚Äėhelp‚Äô from the government.
The move is part of Tory plans to ‚Äėabolish‚Äô the scourge of long-term youth unemployment. Read more »
David Cameron says UK taxpayers shouldn’t have to¬†‚Äúfund the benefits‚ÄĚ of fatties¬†or drug and alcohol addicts who refuse treatment¬†that could help them get back into employment.
Obese people could have their benefits stripped if they refuse treatment in a bid to ensure they can lead a ‚Äúfulfilling life‚ÄĚ, David Cameron has said.
A Conservative government will attempt to ensure that tens of thousands of people who claim welfare on the grounds of obesity, drug or alcohol addiction are ‚Äúincentivised‚ÄĚ to go back to work, the Prime Minister said.
Mr Cameron said that taxpayers should no longer ‚Äúfund the benefits‚ÄĚ of people who refuse to accept the treatment that could help them get back into employment.
He has asked Professor Dame Carol Black, a senior Government adviser of health, to conduct a review into how best to get people with treatable conditions back into work.
The review will focus on how to incentivise the people to get back to work and consider whether their benefits should be stopped if they refuse treatment.
Currently, almost 100,000 people are claiming sickness benefits because they say they are suffering from conditions such as drug or alcohol addiction, or obesity.
However, there is no requirement for such people to undertake treatment, meaning it is possible to claim without making efforts at recovery.
Of the 2.5 million claiming sickness benefits, around 1.5 million have been claiming for more than 5 years.¬† Read more »
I wonder if our very own “future of work” researcher¬†who has¬†never had a proper job, Grant Robertson, would be supportive of a scheme that would see benefits stopped and unemployed forced into work after two years.
They would probably throw their hands up at the horror of the state forcing the indolent into work.
But that is exactly what Labour in the UK is proposing.
The unemployed should be forced to take a job after no more than two years on the dole to end stop them spending a ‘lifetime on benefits’, Labour will say today.
Rachel Reeves is challenging David Cameron to back Labour’s plan for a jobs guarantee to limit Jobseekers Allowance to a year for under 25s and two years for older workers.
In a letter to the Prime Minister, the shadow work and pensions secretary warned the country cannot afford leaving people ‘stuck on benefits for years on end’.
Latest figures show the number of people claiming JSA stood at 867,700 in December, down from 1.6million in 2011 but still 90,000 higher than the pre-crash trough in February 2008.
However, there are 133,200 people aged 25 and over who have been claiming JSA for two years or more, and 30,000 people aged 18-24 have been on JSA for over a year.
Under Labour’s plan, the government would force those on the scheme to take a job working 25 hours a week, paid at the minimum wage, for six months.
The party hopes that four in five people would be kept on by employers in the job after six months.
I can’t believe that I’m not in¬†the¬†running for this award.
Now don’t laugh this is deadly (in an Islamic way) serious.
The Islamic Human Right Commission…snort…snigger…Islamic Human Rights Commission…bwahahaha…is holding a gala dinner and awards night.
Islamic Human Rights Commission have announced the nominees for the Islamophobia Awards 2015. Centred around a gala dinner, the event aims to subvert Islamophobia through comedy and revue while simultaneously addressing a serious and significant issue in a creative manner.
This year the awards have been split into four separate categories: UK, International, News Media and Film/Book/TV Series. Nominees were submitted by the general public who had the chance to write in whomever they felt had displayed prominent cases of Islamophobia. The ‘UK’ category sees the likes of David Cameron, Michael Gove and Theresa May as well as the UK government as a whole. Likely contributing factors for each nomination include Gove’s handling of Operation Trojan Horse and May’s enhanced counter-terrorism measures.
The ‘International’ category is not limited in terms of scope; seeing nominees from the USA, France, Germany and Australia. From high-ranking figures such as Angela Merkel to Mayor Marcel Mortreau in France who decided that Muslim pupils at a local school would not be given an alternative meal to pork. ‘News Media’ features both individuals and institutions: FOX News and The Sun received nominations as did columnist Katie Hopkins who famously referred to Palestinians as ‘filthy rodents burrowing beneath Israel.’ A host of films received nominations with popular television series Homeland and Citizen Khan also obtaining honours.
David Cameron is seeking to show a clear difference between his party and the opposition parties and is moving to reduce the levels of benefits.
He has done it once before and it was remarkably successful….now he is set to reduce the benefits cap even further.
David Cameron will reduce the annual benefits cap to ¬£23,000 as the first act of a new Conservative Government, the Prime Minister has pledged in an interview with The Telegraph.
The move follows the “stampede to the job centre” caused by the original introduction of the ¬£26,000 benefits cap which was heavily opposed by Labour and will form one of the key battlegrounds of the general election campaign.
In an interview to mark 100 days until the general election, Mr Cameron said that his reform of the welfare system is a ‚Äúdeeply progressive programme‚ÄĚ that is ‚Äúchanging people‚Äôs lives‚ÄĚ.
The policy will pay for thee million apprenticeships and everyone in Britain is given ‚Äúthe chance to make the most of their God-given talents‚ÄĚ, the Prime Minister said.
Mr Cameron said that the promise of an immediate law after May‚Äôs election ‚Äútells you everything you need to know about our values‚ÄĚ. ¬† Read more »
Douglas Murray at ¬†The Spectator explains why it is a shameful lie to describe any religion, but in particular Islam as a “religion of peace”.
The West‚Äôs movement towards the truth is remarkably slow. We drag ourselves towards it painfully, inch by inch, after each bloody Islamist assault.
In France, Britain, Germany, America and nearly every other country in the world it remains government policy to say that any and all attacks carried out in the name of Mohammed have ‚Äėnothing to do with Islam‚Äô. It was said by George W. Bush after 9/11, Tony Blair after 7/7 and Tony Abbott after the Sydney attack last month. It is what David Cameron said after two British extremists cut off the head of Drummer Lee Rigby in London, when ‚ÄėJihadi John‚Äô cut off the head of aid worker Alan Henning in the ‚ÄėIslamic State‚Äô and when Islamic extremists attacked a Kenyan mall, separated the Muslims from the Christians and shot the latter in the head. And, of course, it is what President Fran√ßois Hollande said after the massacre of journalists and Jews in Paris last week.
All these leaders are wrong. In private, they and their senior advisers often concede that they are telling a lie. The most sympathetic explanation is that they are telling a ‚Äėnoble lie‚Äô, provoked by a fear that we ‚ÄĒ the general public ‚ÄĒ are a lynch mob in waiting. ‚ÄėNoble‚Äô or not, this lie is a mistake. First, because the general public do not rely on politicians for their information and can perfectly well read articles and books about Islam for themselves. Secondly, because the lie helps no one understand the threat we face. Thirdly, because it takes any heat off Muslims to deal with the bad traditions in their own religion. And fourthly, because unless mainstream politicians address these matters then one day perhaps the public will overtake their politicians to a truly alarming extent.
If politicians are so worried about this secondary ‚Äėbacklash‚Äô problem then they would do well to remind us not to blame the jihadists‚Äô actions on our peaceful compatriots and then deal with the primary problem ‚ÄĒ radical Islam ‚ÄĒ in order that no secondary, reactionary problem will ever grow.
We must confront radical Islam, otherwise it will grow.
Yet today our political class fuels both cause and nascent effect. Because the truth is there for all to see. To claim that people who punish people by killing them for blaspheming Islam while shouting ‚ÄėAllah is greatest‚Äô has ‚Äėnothing to do with Islam‚Äô is madness. Because the violence of the Islamists is, truthfully, only to do with Islam: the worst version of Islam, certainly, but Islam nonetheless.
Last week, a chink was broken in this wall of disinformation when Sajid Javid, the only Muslim-born member of the British cabinet, and one of its brightest hopes, dipped a toe into this water. After the Paris attacks, he told the BBC: ‚ÄėThe lazy answer would be to say that this has got nothing whatsoever to do with Islam or Muslims and that should be the end of that. That would be lazy and wrong.‚Äô Sadly, he proceeded to utter the second most lazy thing one can say: ‚ÄėThese people are using Islam, taking a peaceful religion and using it as a tool to carry out their activities.‚Äô
How many times have we heard this? …from Obama, to Cameron, to many other politicians.
It is a lie. ¬† Read more »
Oh dear lord, it seems Ed Miliband has David Cunliffe and the NZ Labour party advising them.
They are even mimicking declaring a crisis for particular industries and just like in New Zealand they have tried to come up with their own power solution.
It has of course been widely mocked.
Labour‚Äôs flagship energy price freeze was branded ‚Äėa joke‚Äô last night, as senior figures in the party confirmed it has been reviewed in the light of falling prices.
The price freeze, which Mr Miliband pledged would last until 2017, has been thrown into turmoil in recent weeks as a slump in the price of oil saw the prospect of falling energy prices.
The Daily Mail revealed yesterday that Labour is conducting a U-turn on the policy, which was launched by Ed Miliband in 2013.
It has now been ‚Äėre-branded‚Äô as a price cap, which will allow bills to fall to reflect tumbling wholesale prices.
Yesterday E.On became the first Big Six firm to offer a cut in gas prices of 3.5 per cent to its customers, and others are expected to follow suit.¬† Read more »
World leaders Take Heat for Paris Photo Op During March That Some Say Is Deceiving
By Olivia Pierson
Cultural pluralism is as old as the hills ‚Äď or at least as old as the Babylonian Empire on whose riverbank shores even the captive Jews were tolerated to sit and weep. Multiculturalism, on the other hand, is a 20th Century bastardization of tolerance, which the United Nations invented to socially engineer Western democracies to cope with overwhelming immigration, mostly from Third World slave-pens. The pious and politically correct preachers of ‚Äúdiversity‚ÄĚ and ‚Äúequality‚ÄĚ raised multiculturalism in the West to the status of a new religion, as if the world needed yet another one of those.
With the truth emerging after murderous events in Paris, can there still be any doubt that multiculturalism has epically failed in the West? In the last five years Angela Merkel has admitted its failure; so have Nicolas Sarkozy and David Cameron. But how has it failed so?
Multiculturalism is a modern liberal tenet which states that all cultures are equal regardless of the diverse practices of each culture.¬† This should not be confused with cultural pluralism which holds that all citizens, no matter what culture they hail from, are equal before the laws of the land ‚Äďthe one host culture.¬† The host culture is necessarily dominant, hence being the yearly recipient of hundreds of thousands of immigrants bidding farewell to their homelands. ¬† Read more »
Andrea Vance was at great pains to keep her door swipe card data private, she also refused to cough up texts and phone records between her and a minister.
But now in true typical media and left-wing hypocrisy she is demanding the PM coughs up his texts.
In the vaults of Archives New Zealand lies a unique collection of several thousand fading letters, photographs and papers. The Nash Collection offers a window into a world gone by.
Former prime minister Sir Walter Nash became involved in local politics from his arrival in Wellington in 1909. His personal papers are a treasure trove of information about World War II, the birth of the New Zealand Labour Party, as well as every noteworthy issue of the day.
Without them, a hole would exist in the nation’s historical record.
From the same building, chief archivist Marilyn Little will soon start an investigation into the deletion of Prime Minister John Key’s text messages.
Her inquiry stems from a request by the Green Party. It is a spot of political point-scoring, exploiting Key’s embarrassing friendship with hit-job blogger Cameron Slater. But politicking aside, the investigation is truly important.
In the age of the spin doctor, we now rarely know what a politician really thinks. Their response to a crisis is packaged up into palatable soundbites for news bulletins. Biographies, sympathetically penned by acolytes and admirers, have become another election campaign weapon. ¬† Read more »