The New Zealand Kyoto commitment as measured by the Government fell to Zero in April of 2013 the actual commitment in Millions of Units was 29.1M Units but because the value of these Units is linked to the price in Euros of a CER on the European Exchange and that fell to âŹ0.01 effectively zero our units are deemed to be worth less than a CER (though why a unit of carbon is worth less in NZ than it is in Europe is beyond me) this made our 29.1 million credit worth nothing.
Letâs consider that we can actually measure our commitment with any certainty for the moment.
The price of carbon has fallen from around âŹ 12.00 in 2008 to effectively zero âŹ0.01 in April 2013. This fall is due to the manipulation of the market by the EU in allowing the market to be flooded with CERâsÂ and now by the complete loss of credibility of the UN IPCC and the Catastrophic AnthropogenicÂ Global Warming Â scenario painted by that organisation. Â The IPCCâs 5th Assessment report has been bagged by scientists and the press alike.Â James Delingpoleâs article in the TelegraphÂ headlined âThe climate alarmists have lost the debate: it’s time we stopped indulging their poisonous fantasyâ sums it up.
Delingpole quotesÂ IPCC lead author Dr Richard Lindzen as saying Â the IPCC has Â “sunk to a level of hilarious incoherence.” Nigel Lawson has called it “not science but mumbo jumbo”. The Global Warming Policy Foundation’s Dr David Whitehouse has described the IPCC’s panel as “evasive and inaccurate” in the way it tried dodge the key issue of the 15-year (at least) pause in global warming; Donna Laframboise notes that it is either riddled with errors or horribly politically manipulated â or both; Paul Matthews has found a very silly graph; Steve McIntyre has exposed how the IPCC appears deliberately to have tried to obfuscate the unhelpful discrepancy between its models and the real world data; and at Bishop Hill the excellent Katabasis has unearthed another gem: that, in jarring contrast to the alarmist message being put out at IPCC press conferences and in the Summary For Policymakers, the body of the report tells a different story â that almost all the scary scenarios we’ve been warned about these last two decades (from permafrost melt to ice sheet collapse) are now Â graded by scientists to somewhere between “low confidence” to “exceptionally unlikely;” . Â Read more »