Grant Robertson

The weasel words of politicians

Politicians love using weasel words…these are the words that  they drop out all the time that can’t and won’t get them in trouble.

“No plans” is a classic weasel words statement by politicians.

“No plans” is nothing but a convenient way to avoid being straight with the public and heading off potential political attacks. It might serve the politicians well, but it insults the public and needs to be eradicated.

Which brings us to last week’s report by Infrastructure Australia into asset sales to funding public works.

The federal government’s infrastructure body published a $220 billion wish list of asset sales in the states and territories.

For NSW, the stand outs were the publicly-owned utility, Sydney Water, and the Snowy Hydro, which is jointly owned by the NSW and other governments.  Read more »

Sky City Is Evil?

8 Labour MPs accepted corporate box tickets to the RWC from Sky City.

If they’re so evil, why did they accept?

Perhaps they could explain:

Grant Robertson?

David Shearer?

Clayton Cosgrove?  Read more »

Damage Control from Grant Robertson

Grant Robertson has made an extraordinary promise on behalf of the Labour Party.

While Leader David Shearer hides overseas from the fallout over Labour’s economic vandalism masquerading as power policy, Robertson as acting Leader, has promised no intervention in any other market.

This is back-peddling at its finest, because Shearer as Labour Leader, has been promising all sorts of opportunist meddling.

Who are you going to believe? Grant or David?

Read more »

Labour won’t intervene in any other market? Really?

After announcing their intention to intervene and gut the power market and destroy shareholder wealth Labour have been on the back foot facing claims that if their rationale is to be believed on power then why not intervene in other markets.

David Shearer of course is nowhere to be seen, he dropped this policy on Thursday afternoon, promptly made for the airport and bolted like a coward, leaving Grant Robertson and David Parker to unconvincingly defend the biggest lurch to the left since like forever.

Now they are saying they won’t intervene in any other market. They have been forced to because it is now apparent the damage their policy announcement is currently doing to the NZ economy. This is the start of an embarrassing backdown for Labour.

Labour Party deputy leader Grant Robertson has moved to try and reassure financial markets that its sudden lurch to favour central planning in the electricity industry is one-off.

In a statement attacking Economic Development Minister Steven Joyce, Mr Robertson says: “Labour makes no apology for stepping in to fix problems in the electricity sector. But this is not a signal that Labour is going to intervene elsewhere in the economy.

“As we said on the day we launched NZ Power, we have no plans to intervene in any other markets.”

That of course is a lie. Labour has plenty of plans for intervention.  Read more »

Power 20% cheaper than OECD average, but Labour in denial

William Curtayne from Milford Asset Management was on ZB last night with Larry Williams.

He calmly skewers the Green/Labour terrorists for their claims about power prices in NZ.

William Curtayne on power prices (1) "William Curtayne on power prices (1)"

Meanwhile Grant Robertson has come out saying John Key is living in la-la land for saying exactly the same thing:

John Key’s claim this morning that Kiwis aren’t paying too much for their power shows just how out of touch he is, says Labour’s Deputy Leader Grant Robertson.

“John Key should tell that to the Kiwis who dread opening their power bill every month, who think twice about turning the heater on and worry that it’s too expensive to have the electric blanket going this early in the year.  Read more »

The Owl – I Just Don’t Care

The Owl has dipped his toe in the waters of political commentary about the passing of two bills last night.

Congratulations to Labour and Greens on getting through the marriage equality bill and the mondayisation bill.

In politics, to beat the elected government is an achievement, though in the first bill each MP had a choice.

So while the MP’s wasted millions on a couple of bills that had limited importance to NZ as a whole and the first bill celebrates a small minority and the second bill has a number of fish hooks down the track when businesses decide to flout the law I just sat there watching and said “I just don’t care”.  Read more »

Brislen and Robertson square off in unedifying spectacle on Twitter

Rent a quote and all round media whore Paul Brislen was trying to sell his PR services to Labour, but he had a serious SMOG.

Russell Brown and his leftie mates were discussing the lack of impact Labour is having in the GCSB story, and that yet again the Greens are the true opposition party.

Then Brislen’s over-inflated ego couldn’tthelp but get involved.

Followed up by a suggestion:

Ouch!  Read more »

What is Grant Robertson’s role?

Grant Robertson has been front running the attack on John Key and the GCSB. This was done partly because David Shearer is compromised when it comes to remembering things, since he can’t even remember millions stashed in an offshore bank account.

However there may be another reason for Grant Robertson to be front running this…he knows more than he is letting on. The Labour Party have opened up a whole can of hurt on themselves by desperately trying to link the Prime Minister to the unlawful spying by the GCSB on Kim Dotcom. I say this because it turns out, after the Kitteridge report was leaked yesterday that the GCSB may have spied on 88 New Zealand citizens unlawfully, using legislation that Labour set up in 2003.

David Shearer scoffed at the report on Q+A on Sunday when asked, dismissing it as an “internal report”, now however he says that the report validates his calls for an independent inquiry into our spy agencies. Quite how that could be done without compromising our national security has probably escaped him right now.

However what is more curious is that Grant Robertson, who has been leading Labour’s attacks on the Prime Minister’s oversight of the GCSB, was Helen Clark’s senior advisor when the legislation was written. Is it possible that he has known about these issues for quite some time and has used his information to conflate the Kim Dotcom issue in order to attempt to smear all of GCSBs illegal spying under Clark with the few instances under John Key’s watch?

Helen Clark was also notoriously secretive about the GCSB and its operations, and never answered any questions in Parliament about the agency, citing national security reasons. Labour are trying to hang the PM for answering questions in a much more forthright manner than his predecessor.

Air Marshal Bruce Ferguson, who has led the attacks on the appointment of Ian Fletcher, was as the agency’s director in 2012, was the GCSB Director during most of the time the 88 allegedly unlawful spying incidents took place.

That is an amazing coincidence of Clark appointed people all hammering the government in unison over something that was started by them, indeed performed by them, over a much longer period that under John Key.

Rebecca Kitteridge, who reviewed the GCSB’s systems, found that GCSB’s compliance systems set up over many years were totally inadequate, that there was no depository of legal advice, that the audit regime is flawed, that it’s external reporting was insufficient, that it’s management structure is top-heavy, poorly performing staff are tolerated and redeployed, and that the view of the previous Chief Legal Advisor, who wore “too many hats”, was viewed as authoritative and seldom questioned by staff.

It’s no wonder the State Services Commissioner recommended that an outsider with transformational change management experience, rather than yet another military flag officer, take over the leadership of the GCSB.

Attacking Public Servants

David Parker was the chair of the panel that appointed State Services Commissioner Ian Rennie. WARNING this video contains extensive footage of Helen Clark speaking.

Perhaps Duncan Garner might want to reconsider this tweet:

Labour, and particularly Grant Robertson, have launched a nasty attack on Ian Rennie and GCSB Boss Ian Fletcher over the past few days.  Read more »

Stephen Franks on the GCSB issue

Grant Robertson will be suffering in his jocks with the post from Stephen Franks today. He probably won’t suffer too much as he is reputed to use fabric softener on his jocks and with his leadership challenge weight-loss programme going along nicely there is a bit more room as well.

Franks though gives him and his shopped lines to the media a good kick in the slats.

Interesting to see even the sophisticated Peter Cresswell parrotting the establishment line that Ministers should stay out of appointing their own direct reports.

But disconcerting that he casually throws in “separation of powers” as if Key has infringed some constitutional principle.

Peter that convention/principle urges separation and mutual respect and a balance between the Executive, the Judiciary, and the Legislature.

The Prime Minister is the leader of the Executive. He should have a vital interest in who reports to him, in every portfolio. The current convention that Ministers get a veto power after an independent vetting process is not prejudiced by a Minister shoulder tapping candidates to suggest they put themselves forward. Separation of powers is an important constitutional protection. It is cheapened by attempted application to criticise actions entirely confined to the Executive.  Read more »