Hell Pizza

A repeater complains about repeating

It’s ironic isn’t it that Bevan Hurley is complaining there was nothing new on the Sunday programme about Hell Pizza last night:

Of course there was nothing new Bevan….it was the same story that Matt Blomfield helped you write.

The media in New Zealand really are a bunch of lazy repeaters and muppets and it is Matt Blomfield’s hand up their arses moving their mouths.

The Blomfield Files, Ctd – The real story about HELL

Since Sunday has decided to ahead with the story fed to them by Matt Blomfield it is perhaps time to give another update on the ongoing story of the history of Matt Blomfield, so that people who watch that programme can understand how they have just been fed a line of rubbish by a master manipulator.

Remember too readers that in the last update Matt Blomfield had followed his form over the years and gone and laid a vexatious complaint with the Police in an attempt to put pressure on me to stop telling the truth about him. The Police quickly determined that I do not have stolen files and that it is in fact a civil matter.

Going to the Police didn’t work so well for Matt. He still needs to learn what NFWAB means.

It isn’t a crime to tell the truth about people. It isn’t a crime to expose their dirty dealings.

My stories so far have been to tell the whole story behind Hell, which I will continue to do in coming weeks (or days).

Meanwhile The Blomfield Files are:

Faces of the Day - Matt Blomfield and Mike Alexander

Who really ripped off KidsCan? – The real story of Matt Blomfield’s rip off of Kidscan and how he blamed Warren Powell.

How did the media get the story so wrong? - How Matt Blomfield fed the media the Kidscan Story.

Knowing me, Knowing You – Matt Blomfield

The Weeman Caravan Adventures – One of the aggrieved.

Does Matt Blomfield have a tame Liquidator? - Matt Blomfield’s liquidator seems to have a very loose interpretation of the rules.

Greed – not just a billboard from Hell - A short summary of what had been exposed so far.

Operation Kite – Matt Blomfield and Mike Alexander are involved in stealing a cheque and laundering it. Matt Blomfield was pursued by a major bank and lost the case. Private investigators were used to uplift the cheque.

Is there more to this Ménage à trois? - Bruce Johnson, Matt Blomfield and Rebecca Blatchford/Anderson/Blomfield (his partner and sometime wife) and their unusual accounting practices.

Matt vs Mike – Matt Blomfield and Mike Alexander

Ghostwriting for Repeaters 101 – How Matt Blomfield used Maria Slade a Herald on Sunday reporter.

Brothers From Another Mother – Yuta Iguchi and Matt Blomfield and their cosy relationship.

How to lose friends and infuriate people

Something to be proud of… - One of Matt Blomfield’s first charity ripoffs.

Ghostwriting for Repeaters 101, Ctd - How Matt Blomfield colluded with the NBR for yet another bad news story about Hell Pizza.

The Aggrieved - Outlining some of the alleged aggrieved franchisees who are being marshaled to moan to the media by Matt Blomfield.

Random Impertinent Questions for Matt Blomfield - How can a bankrupt be selling businesses on Trademe?

An Email from Matt Blomfield - Matt Blomfield emails me

Matt Blomfield and his bad mattitude - I out the truth of Matt Blomfield’s common assault problem.

Matt Blomfield and his Bad Mattitude, Ctd – Matt Blomfield threatens to punch the boss of Signature Homes.

Blomfield Files: Free to a Good Home – Now that the Police have established the files aren’t stolen, they are still available, though I am in discussions with some outlets.

The Blomfield Files: The Compromise - The tale of Matt Blomfield and the nice cosy deal he made with the “independent” creditors trustee and Mike Alexander in order to try to give all his creditors the flick with just 10c in the dollar.

Blomfield Files: The Compromise, Ctd - While Matt Blomfield was busy trying to stich up his creditors, his lawyer Mike Alexander was sending glowing references about Matt Blomfield to people.

Blomfield Files: The Perfect Storm - The start of the investigation into the goings on with the Storm Group. This is the story of the missing digger and truck.

Blomfield Files: The Perfect Storm, Ctd - The digger and truck are recovered and investigations show that far from being stolen by un-named people they were in fact converted by Matt Blomfield and his brother.

The Aggrieved, Ctd - Sunday is again running a Matt Blomfield fed story about so-called aggrieved franchisees who had their dreams shattered…despite them being given the arse-card for being either broken-arsed 0r a health risk. We know Matt Blomfield fed the story because they use an email that only he would have a copy of…which ironically is one of the reasons why the Police decided I didn’t have stolen files because if that was the case then Matt wouldn’t have been able to give the email to TVNZ.

A conversation with the Police - The Police decide that Matt Blomfield is a liar, and that I don;t have any stolen property.

A conversation with the Police

Readers will remember that Matt Blomfield laid a complaint with the Police alleging that I was in receipt of stolen property, and that related to a burglary and theft from his office around February 2010.

This morning I received an email request from Constable Marty Guest from North Shore CIU. He asked me to call him.

I did so and had a 30 minute conversation regarding the files I have. It transpired that the February 2010 burglary that Matt Blomfield told the Police was of his office was in fact a burglary of the office of Warren Powell located in the old AGC building in Victoria Street. and that it was Warren Powell who had laid the complaint with the Police, not Matt Blomfield.

Once again Matt Blomfield has lied. Once again he has been found out.

When I started pointing out the details of the items on the burglary report including specific items like the $17,000 Shag painting he soon realised that I knew an awful lot more about the case than he did, including what was actually stolen.

The conversation was pleasant and wide-ranging. But the bottom line was Matt Blomfield had fabricated a complaint and the poor Constable was now in the middle of it all.

Later this afternoon Constable Guest rang me back to tell me that this was really a civil matter and since the files I had were copies and that I didn’t have possession of the originals even though I know who does I was not doing anything illegal. As far as he was concerned and that of his superiors it was a civil matter.

He did warn me that I should not in any way agree to meet Matt Blomfield…I didn’t find this strange at all considering his previous record of violence and intimidation.

We discussed how I could arrange the return of some personal items that are unrelated to the investigation that I am conducting into the nefarious life of Matt Blomfield. I have agreed to courier those items to North Shore police. I have also agreed to provide a copy of some personal data if Matt Blomfield supplies a portable Hard Drive.

The bottom line is the Police do not believe that I have any stolen information and they consider this to be a civil matter.

No doubt the 142 emails that Matt Blomfield has previously sent to and mention North Shore Police that I discussed with Constable Guest may have given them an indication that Matt Blomfield has form when it comes to paying vexatious complaints with authorities.

Matt Blomfield however should not expect that to be the end of his dealings with the Police, as there is a small matter of conversion of a digger, truck & boat (still at large).

The Aggrieved, Ctd

SUNDAY welcomes repeater Matt Blomfield to the team.

I blogged the other day about “The Aggrieved“. The so-called aggrieved franchisees from Hell Pizza. Funny how it is the same three that always get rolled out when Matt Blomfield sells a story to the media.

I have just seen the promo for Sunday’s show about Hell Pizza on their Facebook Page and it is as I suspected. Perhaps readers should enlighten them as to the facts.

They are using Benji and Natasha from Khandallah, Shaun from Dunedin and Weeman from Pukekohe.

These will be “poor woe is me” stories without the full story being told. This is again another Matt Blomfield special.

Listen to him tell me that he knows all about the show:

Here is an email between Callum Davies and Matt Blomfield about Matt telling all to Sunday in September last year:

As a taster about how wrong Sunday are here is an email from Natasha explaining that they needed “us time” as the reason for selling.

I bet Natasha and Benji didn’t tell Sunday that they had the worst store in New Zealand on cleanliness and performance. I bet Sunday isn’t aware of the full email conversation that they are going to release on the programme for full shock value. I bet Sunday is going to regret getting a copy of that email from Matt Blomfield.

In this email exchange Matt is pushing Stu ‘McMillions’ McMullin to exit Warren Powell out of Hell NZ, why would Matt be doing that? And why did Callum & Stu push Warren out?  I will cover the reasons behind this in a later post. Note that Matt Blomfield, a bankrupt was trying to get shares in Hell Remuera placed into his family trust. Did Matt inform his OA about the possibility of these shares?

Here is the full email exchange and you can see despite their promo featuring Warren Powell the real arseholes are Matt Blomfield and Callum Davies.

Blomfield Files: Operation Bumblebee Email

Here is another email trail showing that Matt Blomfield, Stu McMullin and Callum Davies concocted “Operation Bumblebee” and at the last minute called in Warren Powell to be, as Callum Davies states, “be the big bad wolf“.

Blomfield Files: Khandallah_Email

As a further taster here is a photo from Shaun’s Dunedin store [Please note that Shaun is no longer the franchisee, there is a new franchisee in this store and it is meeting all health standards]

I bet also that Shaun didn’t tell Sunday that his brother in Nelson is one of the biggest agitators along with Matt Blomfield. I bet he also didn’t tell Sunday that him and his brother are trying to establish a franchisees association even though he isn’t a current franchisees and his brothers store is on the market.. I bet they also didn’t tell Sunday that their efforts are going nowhere because the majority of franchisees are doing OK.

I’ve had quite a few calls from existing franchisees who have been exceedingly grateful that I have been telling the true story of Matt Blomfield and revealing the real story about what has been going on inside Hell Pizza.

Oh and here is another photo from Dunedin:

UPDATE: I had a call from the current franchisee about these photos. She wanted to assure me that it has taken a long time to turn around the legacy of Shaun Browne. The store was a mess when they took over and hard graft and has managed to turn it around. They are very annoyed that poor franchisees like Shaun Browne, Matt Blomfield “Weeman” and Benji and Natasha are damaging the hard work that many other franchisees have and are putting into their stores.

I was thanked for my expose into these poor franchisees and the activities of Matt Blomfield.

Blomfield Files: The Compromise, Ctd

This morning I blogged about Matt Blomfield’s dodgy arrangements in organising his creditors compromise.

As a recap Matt Blomfield paid $10,000 to Time Capital prior to them being appointed, or in fact Mike Alexander appearing to introduce the two of them in an email of 18 February.

Time Capital then set about consulting extensively with both Mike Alexander and Matt Blomfield about the Creditors Compromise and finally a document is issued that states that  Time Capital were independently appointed despite the fact that Matt Blomfield paid them $10,000 and was introduced to them by Mike Alexander, who is looking more compromised day by day. Remember Matt Blomfield also say he will pay more.

In this email trail below we can see that this whole arrangement was organised by Mike Alexander as a favour for a “client”…who was “in funds”. Just a few months later Matt Blomfield went under and all his companies for more than $3.5 million. But not before Mike Alexander provided a glowing reference to Stuart Alexander Limited.

Tom Wilson says he would like to help despite the later email saying it wouldn’t work out…perhaps the initial $10,000 deposit helped change his mind.

Blomfield Files: The Compromise Intro

Blomfield Files: Free to a Good Home

I have now copied all of the Blomfield Files onto a portable drive. It is just over 1Tb of juicy dirt.

Andrew Krukziener, Bruce Sheppard, Matt Blomfield, Mike Alexander, Bruce Johnson, Garry Whimp, Trevor Perry, Yuta Iguchi, Tania Iguchi/McRae, Rebecca Anderson/Blatchford/Blomfield, Roger Bowden, Stuart Gloyn, Paul “Weeman” Hinton, Glen Collins, Stu McMullin, Callum Davies, plus a famous All Black…are just some of the names of those who have aided and abetted Matt Blomfield’s trail of destruction through business circles nationally.

Drugs, fraud, extortion, bullying, corruption, collusion, compromises, perjury, deception, hydraulic-ing..it’s all there.

This complete archive of his dodgy dealings, cover-ups and lies is available to any reputable journalist who calls. First in first served.

Probably not a good idea for Bevan Hurley, Hazel Philips, Sarah McDonald or any media flunky that bought Matt’s bullshit to call.

I have taken the liberty of excluding the large amount of illegal movies and home made porn that he had collected. (yuk)

Matt Blomfield and his Bad Mattitude, Ctd

In the trail of destruction that is Matt Blomfield, I found this interesting email exchange where Matt Blomfield threatens to punch the face of the Signature Homes Managing Director for daring to insist they get paid.

Remember, as I previously blogged Matt Blomfield was already on an assault charge for throwing a bailiff down a flight of stairs in April 2008.

This email exchange goes some way to understanding the pathology of the psychopathy of Matt Blomfield. When confronted he resorts to false complaints, then threatening, then out right bullying, pretty much where he is heading with me. Gavin Hunt was very perspicacious when he wrote this in 2008:

And so there is. We hope that Gavin Hunt gets to read this post…He will, I’ll email him the link.

The only difference this time is that I know everything about Matt Blomfield and he forgets that. I know his plays, I know his methods and like Gavin Hunt from Signature Homes I’m not afraid to call Matt Blomfield on his bullshit and his lies (You should see his CVs)

Have a read of this…it is highly entertaining and gives you an insight into matt’s deluded mind. BTW he lost against Signature Homes, despite his endless and false counter claims.

Matt Blomfield v. Signature Homes

Matt Blomfield and his bad mattitude

In his email to me Matt Blomfield moans about his assault diversion. He says:

In my case, it was pushing a person’s hand. Although I believed I had a defence, I was offered Diversion and took it. In doing so, I had an expectation that I would not hear of the matter again. If I had known that you would take a document, that you knew was stolen, and post it on the Worldwide Web, I would have defended the charge. I believe your action was both deliberate and malicious.

This presents Matt Blomfield with a little legal problem that he may not be aware of or foreseen with his mattjik powers. You see in order to qualify for diversion you have to plead guilty and show remorse. If at a later date it is shown that there was in fact no remorse and no admission guilt then the Police are fully entitled to re-visit the diversion. Given the Police are now looking at all of this I thought it was pertinent raise that little problem.

Then there is his explanation of the assault to me in a phone conversation:

Now this story and his email tells quite a different story to the one that someone emailed me on the tipline. Quite apart from his apparent memory loss at the start of the call his view of history is in stark contrast to my tipster’s recollection.

So, Matt Blomfield reluctantly accepted diversion for pushing someone’s hand. Strange. My recollection was that he threw a court-appointed bailiff down a flight of stairs. But yes, I’m sure he accidentally pushed his hand in the process.

As we have seen in the revelations thus far Matt Blomfield has a propensity to lie, cheat, bully, lie some more and when things start going against him he makes up complaints to authorities and he will sonn take the next step and start threatening me. That won’t go so well for him…in fact it will just make me escalate the drip feed of telling the truth about Matt Blomfield.

UPDATE: Look what I found…it seems that the Police opposed Diversion for Matt Blomfield.

The Blomfield Files

I can confirm that Matt Blomfield has indeed followed his form over the years and gone and laid a vexatious complaint with the Police in an attempt to put pressure on me to stop telling the truth about him.

That isn’t going to work so well for Matt. He needs to learn what NFWAB means.

It isn’t a crime to tell the truth about people. It isn’t a crime to expose their dirty dealings.

Since this is now in the Herald this post will serve as a handy summary about the dealings of Matt Blomfield. Rest assured there is plenty more to come…and now that Matt Blomfield has done as I predicted and gone nasty he is going to find out what happens when you do FWAB.

Faces of the Day - Matt Blomfield and Mike Alexander

Who really ripped off KidsCan? – The real story of Matt Blomfield’s rip off of Kidscan and how he blamed Warren Powell.

How did the media get the story so wrong? - How Matt Blomfield fed the media the Kidscan Story.

Knowing me, Knowing You – Matt Blomfield

The Weeman Caravan Adventures – One of the aggrieved.

Does Matt Blomfield have a tame Liquidator? - Matt Blomfield’s liquidator seems to have a very loose interpretation of the rules.

Greed – not just a billboard from Hell - A short summary of what had been exposed so far.

Operation Kite – Matt Blomfield and Mike Alexander are involved in stealing a cheque and laundering it. Matt Blomfield was pursued by a major bank and lost the case. Private investigators were used to uplift the cheque.

Is there more to this Ménage à trois? - Bruce Johnson, Matt Blomfield and Rebecca Blatchford/Anderson/Blomfield (his partner and sometime wife) and their unusual accounting practices.

Matt vs Mike – Matt Blomfield and Mike Alexander

Ghostwriting for Repeaters 101 – How Matt Blomfield used Maria Slade a Herald on Sunday reporter.

Brothers From Another Mother – Yuta Iguchi and Matt Blomfield and their cosy relationship.

How to lose friends and infuriate people

Something to be proud of… - One of Matt Blomfield’s first charity ripoffs.

Ghostwriting for Repeaters 101, Ctd - How Matt Blomfield colluded with the NBR for yet another bad news story about Hell Pizza.

The Aggrieved - Outlining some of the alleged aggrieved franchisees who are being marshaled to moan to the media by Matt Blomfield.

Random Impertinent Questions for Matt Blomfield - How can a bankrupt be selling businesses on Trademe?

An Email from Matt Blomfield - Matt Blomfield emails me

An email from Matt Blomfield

Matt Blomfield has emailed me. True to form it is full of bluster, implied and actual threats and a not inconsequential amount of bullshit.

I will address his spurious claims in separate posts, especially the issue surrounding the police complaint in 2010, and whether or not there is any wrong-doing in the evidence I have. I will point out that I believe that the authorities ahould in fact look through all this evidence and so I am preparing it all to be delivered to the Serious Fraud office.

In particular I will draw their attention to the relationship between Andrew Krukiener and Matt Blomfield, the McBreen Jenkins issue, and his restructuring to hide assets with the assistance of Bruce Johnson in order to defeat creditors. On top of that I will outline the creation of fraudulent invoices, the removal of cash from one company to pay the debts of another company and his work for the tame liquidator of his companies on the sly.

I have been slowly releasing information because there is so much, and I needed to show readers the long history of malfeasance associated with Matt Blomfield.

Before you read the email listen to Matt Blomfield confirm that what I have is true:

Matt Blomfield <matt@[redacted].co.nz> Fri, May 11, 2012 at 12:55 AM
To: whaleoil

 

Mr. Cameron Slater

Whale Oil Website

Over the past ten days you have posted a number of  documents on your website www.whaleoil.co.nz. By your own admission you have in your possession a number of large boxes containing my personal files, email, hard drives and databases.

You have stated on your website the following “I have the documents, I have the emails, I have the files and I have the hard drives and I have the databases.”

The items which you have in your possession were stolen from my offices in a Burglary which took place in 2010. The Burglary was reported to the Police at the time.

I have now reported this matter to the New Zealand Police as these items are stolen and you have no authorization to access my computer system including my hard drive containing my personal emails.

You did not seek permission to publish from myself or any of the recipients or authors of the documents.

The posts that you have made demonstrate that you have opened the hard drive and accessed strings of correspondence. That can only have been a deliberate action on your part.

I believe that you have been quite aware that the items and documents were stolen from me. Further, any reasonable person looking at the documents would be aware that the access was unauthorised, as the emails all contain a confidentiality and privacy footer warning against the unauthorised possession or use of the documents. You have completely ignored the Legal Notices. Indeed you have published them!

I would like to bring to you attention the following sections of the Crimes Act 1961.

252. Accessing computer system without authorisation

(1)Every one is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 2 years who intentionally accesses, directly or indirectly, any computer system without authorisation, knowing that he or she is not authorised to access that computer system, or being reckless as to whether or not he or she is authorised to access that computer system.

(2)To avoid doubt, subsection (1) does not apply if a person who is authorised to access a computer system accesses that computer system for a purpose other than the one for which that person was given access.

Currently you are accessing my personal emails and other documents without my permission or authorization. I bring to your attention that this is a criminal offence punishable by imprisonment.

246.        Receiving

           (1)Every one is guilty of receiving who receives any property stolen or obtained by any other crime, knowing that property to have been stolen or so obtained, or being reckless as to whether or not the property had been stolen or so obtained.

          (2)For the purposes of this section, property that was obtained by any act committed outside New Zealand that, if it had been committed in New Zealand, would have constituted a crime is, subject to subsection (5), to be regarded as having been obtained by a crime.

 

                 (3)The act of receiving any property stolen or obtained by any other crime is complete as soon as the offender has, either exclusively or jointly with the thief or any other person, possession of, or control over, the property or helps in concealing or disposing of the property.

 

                (4)If—

 

(a)any property stolen or obtained by any other crime has been returned to the owner; or                                             

 

(b) legal title to any such property has been acquired by any person,—

                                a subsequent receiving of it is not an offence, even though the receiver may know that the property had previously been stolen or obtained by any other crime.

(5)If a person is charged with an offence under this section and the property was obtained by an act committed outside New Zealand, it is to be presumed, unless the person charged puts the matter at issue, that the doing of the act by which the property was obtained was an offence under the law of the place where the act was done.

247.                        Punishment of receiving:

                Every person who is guilty of receiving is liable as follows:

                               (a)if the value of the property received exceeds $1,000, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 7 years:

 

               (b)if the value of the property received exceeds $500 but does not exceed the sum of $1,000, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 1 year:

 

                                        (c)if the value of the property received does not exceed $500, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 3 months.

The Police Diversion Agreement, which you have posted on your website, is a confidential document stolen from me. The Police Diversion process is available to people without prior convictions who have committed minor offences. In my case, it was pushing a person’s hand. Although I believed I had a defence, I was offered Diversion and took it. In doing so, I had an expectation that I would not hear of the matter again. If I had known that you would take a document, that you knew was stolen, and post it on the Worldwide Web, I would have defended the charge. I believe your action was both deliberate and malicious.

Significantly for you, the Diversion process involves the application of name suppression to the person who has completed the Diversion.

I realise that you have a history of breaching Court Orders of this sort, but if you have again transgressed, particularly in posting a document which you must have realised was dishonestly obtained, I trust you will be held to account for your actions.

The balance of the documents disclose no criminal offending whatsoever. Your one sided and highly inaccurate commentaries suggest that I am guilty of Criminal behaviour when that is not so, and the documents themselves do not suggest anything of the sort.

The worst aspect of your behaviour is that a number of people, who have corresponded with me in the expectation of privacy, have had their correspondence published. These people may well have used language that they only use when talking to a friend, and may well have said very frank things about other people, that they would only say to someone they trusted. Their trust has been totally abused by your decision to take stolen documents and not only publish the contents, but suggest that those innocent people are guilty of Criminal acts as well.

I have had a (now well publicised) business failure. Primarily, it was some big mistakes I made, including my involvement in a certain Pizza business, which left me, and a good few others, bankrupt. Big  house, car, boat – all gone, leaving me with a beautiful wife, loving family and some loyal friends to help me start all over again. I have sucked it up, met all my legal obligations and have tried being humble. I need to make a living and I am allowed to do so.

It puzzles me that I have never met you and have never had any previous interaction with you or this strange little website. It therefore puzzles me that you would be the recipient of 2 year old stolen material, itself of no real moment, and then attach such a nasty commentary to it. I do wonder what motivation is required to do that? The answer may well be found in your commentary, which attempts to re-write history in favour of one particular person.

I am sure many people find your malcontent website mildly amusing. I may well have too. However, gross breaches of Privacy and the Criminal Law are an insidious form of calculated harm. I accept that you are, in all likelihood, too lacking in any sort of conscience to halt your actions without being legally required to, however, I do ask that you publish this letter in order to provide even just a veneer of balance.

Regards

Matt Blomfield