Henk van Helmond

Cyber Bully Given his Beans

I have been waiting and watching for this case to come to its inevitable conclusion.

Why?

Because I have been attacked by Henk van Helmond as have many, many other people. I have also been involved in helping his victims stand up to him and this is the result of my help:

A cyberbully who threatened to name and shame a woman who wanted posts removed from his website has had the tables turned on him.

Henricus Geradus Van Helmond, 52, of Woodville had asked for $2000 when the woman told him she had legal advice about deleting her posts, leading to him being charged with blackmail.

Justice Joe Williams in the High Court at Wellington told him there was a certain poetic justice in doing to him what he had threatened to do to the victim.

In a highly emotional statement the victim, whose name is suppressed, said, “He didn’t hold a gun to my head he held a computer and it was more soul destroying than a bullet.”

She blamed her declining health on Van Helmond.

She had contact with Van Helmond through two websites that were critical of CYFs.  She had been having difficulties over care of her grandchildren and made posts to the website.

Van Helmond took the websites down in 2010 but put them back up in 2012.

Justice Williams said in the meantime the victim’s relationship with CYFs had improved and she was distressed to learn her posts could still be seen and was concerned it could undermine what she had built up with CYFs.

He said she asked Van Helmond to take her posts down.

“You responded in an extraordinarily aggressive way, I have seen the emails.”

Van Helmond threatened to report her lawyer to the law society and said he would name and shame her through the website with personal information unless they paid $1000 each to himself and another of the website’s administrators.

“You got on your high horse and began firing threats, to bully her to go away.”

Justice Williams said he breached the victim’s trust and the effect on her was palpable in the court when she read her victim impact statement.

He said the offending has an element of naivety.

“This was not planned Hollywood style blackmail, rather a spur of the moment aggressive threat. ¬†It was stupid but not evil.”

Actually the Judge is wrong. Henk Van Helmond is evil. The emails he has sent me over the years are appalling. A weaker person would have cracked.

I was contacted by his victim in this case. I too am privvy to the emails he sent. Henk Van Helmond is a bully, a blackmailer and a coward who hides behind his illness. He played this court case out as long as possible in order to prolong the pain of his victim.

Henk van Helmond has run his little jihad against Cyfs with firstly, the CyfsWatch website then with CyfsTalk.org. He now has a CyfsTalk Facebook page where he rules with terror. His usual user name in many different internet forum is kiwi1960.

Stay away from Henk van Helmond, he is a manipulative, narcissistic, psychopath who takes great delight in taunting vulnerable people.

 

Might be a good thing

ŠĒ• Manawatu Standard

Henk van Helmond is a bully and is currently in court charged with extortion. Regular readers will know that this is the guy who runs CYFSWatch blog. He also threatened me with a beating and throwing bricks through my windows. He also issued Sue Bradford with a death threat.

Just so you know he also goes by the Twitter name of kiwi1960_1. He likes abusing people…a lot….especially John ¬†Key and me.

He is a angry bitter man, one of the Angry Dads club, men who think that the government has a conspiracy of feminist Judges and collusive government departments depriving them of their kids when the fact is they are abusive bullies.

He set about threatening two lovely women who contacted me after Googling his name…After hearing of his story of tyranny¬†against¬†them and the¬†blackmail¬†attempt I advised them to go to the Police. I am pleased to see that they did.

Apparently he is near death without his computer…and as usual it is all a government conspiracy:

A sickness beneficiary accused of demanding money from a woman has told a court he may die before his next appearance if he cannot be reunited with his computer.

In the Dannevirke District Court yesterday, Henricus Geradus Van Helmond appeared before Judge Bridget Mackintosh on the rare charge of extortion.

The Woodville 51-year-old entered no plea, after limping into the dock using a crutch and carrying a heap of papers, one of which he passed to the judge.

Court documents say that on January 18, in Woodville, Van Helmond demanded $2000 cash from a woman.

Initially Judge Mackintosh didn’t want to have a look at any bits of paper Van Helmond handed forward, telling him to wait until his next appearance, which will be in the Palmerston North District Court next month.

“I may not be alive then,” Van Helmond said.

So the judge had a look at an A4 sheet.

He wanted his computer back from police after they seized it.

“All my diabetes data and MS data is on [there],” he said.

“All my skin is coming off my hands, all because my diabetes is all over the place, and my data is on that computer. I can’t wait that long, the data is needed today.”

Police prosecutor Sergeant Ollie Outtrim said the computer was with analysts in Wellington, but he would phone the officer in charge to see how long that might take.

“This is just an attempt to blackmail me into pleading guilty,” Van Helmond said.

When cowards attack

Henk van Helmond is a coward. He attacks me from his “blog” and calls me a wimp. As you may know Henk is a member of the Angry Dad’s Club prone to brik chucking and other inanities.

Henk van Helmond is a coward

Henk van Helmond is a coward

So how did your defence go when the Police charged you with breaching name suppression Henk? Oh that’s right, you doffed your cap, plead guilty and threw yourself on the mercy of the court, oh and used your mental illness as an excuse, something you won’t find me doing.

Oh and who is the benefit bludger?…..oh wait…you again.

You clearly fail to understand that my case has a two pronged attack. Today was but the first step.

An exercise in politeness and civility

The other day I wrote about who may or may not have been behind the Brick Chuckers who continue to elude Mr Plod and seem to keep wanting to create wanton damage around the place.

One suspect group reacted with violence and outrage and continue to harrass me via email, except I don't get them anymore because of Googles wonderful spam feature. They threatened my family and abused me all over the place.

The other possibility that I alluded to rang me tonight. Mr Nobilangelo Ceramalus was very polite and courteous and explained how opposed to violence and vandalism. He asked that I clarify his position. We spoke for about 20 minutes about politics in general and global warming plus some other stuff….I don't think we are ever going to see eye to eye on anything but at east we were polite.

So accordingly I now discount Mr Ceramalus from being one of the Brick Chuckers due entirely to the reasonable way in which he handled himself. I thank you Nobilangelo for your courtesy and politeness.

On the other hand we are left with the other group who by their very actions codemn themselves.

Therefore I say again, especially to any increadibly dim Police investigators who can't work simple things out that People-PowerNZ = CYFSWatch. 

Nice Guys

I have been receiving quite a few emails after my post about the Brick Chuckers. Plus the comments have been burned up by ranting, raving, lunatics. Here are some of th examples of the emails sent from these really nice caring “Dads”.

Given that you have more to lose than they do – might be an idea for you to pull your head in.

I am a bit surprised that you are having a go at me – I’m just laying it out for you, because obviously, you have not carefully considered either the cost of your actions, or who you may be up against.

According to the Dominion Post, People Power have hit 4 political offices in a month, one allegedly with a gunshot through the window.

Do you think for a second that they are going to be worried about whether or not you own a bloody gun?

No wonder no one fucks around with the Muslims…………they blow their enemies up.

Nexus.

Obviously he hasn’t heard of George W Bush or the State of Israel.

How about this one….

Your home address is now in the public domain.

So, what are you going to do about it?

You sound afraid – you see, the mistake you and Dave made was to pick on one of my friends.

You push me, I’ll push back – only next time, I won’t warn you – I’ll just send someone over.

Nexus.

Or this one

Nexus Man <[email protected]>
to Cam Slater ,
date Feb 11, 2008 9:14 PM
subject RE: Your post
mailed-by windowslive.com

Cameron,

Your claims have been refuted, and re-refuted, but you just don’t listen.

You need to take responsibility for your actions – all you found was an independent server that hosted some sites you don’t like.

You have no evidence of links between groups – you just made some stuff up.

And when the CYFSWATCH people attempted to correct you – you went ballistic.

You and Dave then posted private details of a poster to your site – and when the favour was returned by me to you – you went ballistic again.

You sound like a very angry man, which I’m picking may be an abreaction to a latent depression.

You attack sites like CYFSWATCH, yet not once do you ask the hosts of the CYFSWATCH site why they host such a site.

“Must be grumpy old men” you say.

You hate the People Power people because you see them as “extremist”, yet here you are ready to shoot me with your gun, just for “putting some words on the internet” – you are completly inconsistent in your thinking.

Just imagine what would happen if I did forward a notification to CYF – you’d be fucked as a Dad, because, given the thread here, and what
is on your blog (the “come around and I will shoot you” bit), your son would be taken into immediate care and protection, pending an investigation – no if, buts, or maybes.

You seem to regard fear as a weakness; yet courage can only operate in the presence of fear, not in its absence.

What you display is a complete and utter recklessness for your personal safety, which is fine, but as a parent, you don’t have that luxury anymore.

If something did happen to you – where would that leave him?

You don’t seem to realise how vulnerable you are Cameron – or worse, you maybe just don’t care.

You might as well have painted a great big target on yourself which reads “aim here please”.

Deathwish, perhaps?

Nexus.

Nice huh!!! and not once have they tried to be reasonable in communicating with me, and it is not like it is hard, I do even have a contact page. I have come to the conclusion that these guys are batshit mad, perhaps even madder than Tom Cruise and that is saying something.

Who are the Brick Chuckers?

Who is behind People Power, the wingnuts chucking bricks through Labour and Greens electorate offices?
Idiot/Savant thinks that it is the “Kiwiblog Right” . I think he is wrong and here is why. I certainly have more evidence than he has shown for his claims and calls for National declaim the chuckers.

Two possible scenario’s exist. One is stronger than the other but someone with resources beyond mine should look at both.

Scenario 1 – Angry Dad’s Union organised

The domain name for People Power NZ is www.people-powernz.org. A Whois check shows that they are using a privacy company to hide their details. Not a bad effort but IP addresses leave trails.

One tool that is useful but not definitive is myIPneighbours.com.

A check on www.people-powernz.org shows that;
people-powernz.org has the IP address: 75.126.196.84
5 other websites are found with the IP 75.126.196.84

1) people-powernz.org
2) buggerit.co.nz
3) cyfstalk.org
4) cyfswatch.org
5) pttp-hosting.com
6) purebrednz.com

Very interesting. So People Power’s blog is hosted on the same IP address as the wingnuts from the Angry Dad’s Union and also has their name servers set to pttp-hosting.com. Pttp-Hosting .com was setup by the CYFSWatch crowd to try to hide their details. Interesting collection of Angry Dad’s and Pitbull Breeders websites all on the same IP. They say you are known by the company you keep.

I’d say that there is a better than even chance that the same wingnuts are chucking bricks through Labour and Green Offices. But are they really the “Kiwiblog Right”. I don’t think so. CYFSWatch and the brick chuckers have repeatedly been denounced by DPF so quite why idiot/Savant, Russell Brown and others continue the smear is beyond me other than for pure political gain or malice.

Scenario 2 – Green/Leftwing front group

On Waiheke Island there is a nutbar that goes by the name of Nobilangelo Ceramalus. He is a current Community Board member and interestingly has registered the domain name peoplepower.org.nz. Similar name, crazy owner..is it possible there is a connection. If there is then this scenario exposes the Green party to claims of setting up and running nothing less than a Green/left wing front group, with the sole goal to turn public opinion against legitmate protest regarding the EFA.

There are signs that this guy is a loose unit, certainly he is capable of chucking bricks, if not brickbats as he has done recently against Citizens and Ratepayers

Nobilangelo is a community board member, and failed council candidate :

He also appears to have “green” tendancies, as evidenced by is business , which specialises in what can only be described as green energy.

And it appears he likes to “rock out with his cock out” occasionally

And he’s definately no fan of National Party (or in this case C&R) supporters:

Are the rock chuckers a Green/Left front group? Well that is up to Russel Norman and Nostradamus Mentalingus to refute categorically.

So there we are, two scenarios, both plausible. One could easily a coincidence. The phrase “people power” is widely used. It’s far more plausible that CYFSWatch are behind the brick throwing.

Still with the Greens and their association with the Happy Valley campaign and the more extreme elements of the Urewera 17 it is still a possibility that this is a Green/Left front front group and they should come out with a categorical denial of any influence or collusion with the brick chuckers. If it is good enough for Idiot/Savant to call for the same from National without a shred of evidence then clearly I am well within my rights to make the same call of the Greens and the left in general. At least I have some circumstantial evidence.

UPDATE: Nobilangelo Ceramalus has contacted me and refuted all the details here. He also tells me that some other fool who apparently runs a rag of little circulation on Waiheke likes to mention this page as some sort of evidence of Nobilangelo’s nefarious activities. I’d suggest Merv you deal with the issues rather than attack the man.

“Kiwiblog Right”, I don’t think so. Nutbars, definitely.