Lifestyle, arts and travel blogger David Farrar is away again.
Kiwiblog has again reverted to a blog of David’s mid-life crisis and travels.
Not content with his own travel blogging, he also now has guest travel blog posts.
However he does have a guest post from Kiwi in America that is very good. Why is it Kiwiblog’s best posts are while he is away?
Regular readers of Kiwiblog will recall my lengthy essay posted on Easter Friday about the recent history of Labour; some of it based on my time as an activist there until the mid 90âs attempting to explain Labourâs present day conundrum.
In a nutshell it said that an attempt by the left of the party to seize permanent control of Labour after the massive post Rogernomics ructions under the leadership of Helen Clark, led to a gradual purging of activists from the centrist and right wings of the party. Clark, and her followers in the Head Office and regional hierarchies, ensured the selection of candidates in winnable electorate seats (and after the introduction of MMP, also the party list) that not only ensured she could topple then leader Mike Moore after the 1993 election but also cemented her power base inside Labour guaranteeing her an unchallenged 15 year reign as Labourâs leader. This handed power in the party to an increasingly narrow base of sector and interest groups such as academics, trade unions, progressive feminists and the rainbow coalition gradually driving out activists who were more likely to be white, male, socially conservative, small business owners and church going people of faith. After Labourâs 2008 election defeat, former members of the harder left New Labour Party, homeless after the dissolution of the Alliance, the demise of Andertonâs Progressives and the rise of the Greens, began to come back to Labour assisting in the movement of the party more to the left.
This trend culminated in the amendment to Labourâs Constitution at its 2012 Annual Conference giving 40% of the vote for Party Leader to the party membership and 20% to the affiliated unions leaving only 40% in the hands of the Parliamentary caucus. This new formula enabled David Cunliffe to win the first full leadership primary in 2013 despite having only minority support in caucus â the first time this had ever happened in Labourâs history. The result of his elevation to the leadership was Labourâs third successive and even more disastrous defeat.
When you drive out of the party its more centrist activists, you leave a vacuum that has been filled by harder left activists. When these same activists, alongside the more traditionally left wing trade union leadership, have control of the partyâs candidate selections, its policy formation and now the election of its leader, over time you end up with a party, candidates and policies that no longer appeal to middle NZ and a party that is no longer the broad church it used to be. The party may be truer to its left wing principles but it now produces candidates, policies and campaigning rhetoric out of step with the aspirations of floating middle NZ voters that decide elections. Nationalâs moderate centrist direction under John Key has become the natural repository for various key demographic groups that once used to strongly vote Labour and accordingly, Labour has ended up falling further behind National in each subsequent election post its 2008 defeat culminating in its second lowest vote this election since its formation in 1916!
Labour is now undertaking yet another review of why it was defeated and another likely more bruising leadership primary.