Speaker David Carter has slapped down speculation he wants a top diplomatic posting – after New Zealand First leader Winston Peters intimated he would block such an appointment if in power.
After Mr Peters’ comments yesterday, Mr Carter has taken the unusual step of delivering a press statement to press gallery reporters, denying he wanted a change of job. Read more »
In 2008 Lockwood Smith, then National’s immigration spokesman, made some absolutely stupid racist comments about Asians and Pacific Islanders coming to NZ to work. They were brainless and relatively harmless comments but John Key showed integrity and immediately forced Smith to apologise.
Mr Key said the comments could be offensive “and I think it’s totally appropriate to apologise this morning”.
Key then backed up Smiths racist lapse by refusing to give him a position in the cabinet, instead giving him the dunce job of Speaker. Read more »
As we have seen TV3 is touting a poll that shows Winston Peters is supposedly ahead in the race for Northland.
Do I believe this?
Sure…Winston should be ahead, I’m surprised he isn’t ahead more.
TV3 commissioned this poll literally just hours after Mark Osborne had been selected for National. He is an unknown to the wider electorate.
Winston, the dear old trougher has been around politics for more than 40 years. He is as well-known to everyone as lines on their palms of their hands.
He should have come first in that poll.
But are Northlanders really as stupid as TV3 has led us to believe?
A man over 70 years of age, who couldn’t walk 100m briskly let along run it without risk of a coronary or stroke is the “Force for the North”…more like a spent force, or a farce.
He bangs on about his beloved Northland but spent a lifetime running in seats in Auckland and the Bay of Plenty. He got spanked by Lockwood Smith in his only real selection in a general seat and ran off to play in Hunua, which proved a temporary assignment. Remember when he was happy to be the member for Tauranga, until a young whipper snapper with a croaky voice kept him out. Now he lives in Auckland and yet professes his love for Northland.
A love so fickle that NZ First hasn’t stood a candidate in Northland for three consecutive elections…this is the “force for the North”?
The media love promoting Winston, and they never hold him to account. When did you see anyone in the media hold the old trougher to account for any of what I have outlined above? Read more »
Feel the tears of impotent rage from Felix Marwick, upset that he isn’t one of those shaping opinion in election year.
There’s nothing quite like an election campaign for getting tempers up, emotions raised, and judgements lowered. All of a sudden anything becomes a tool for political gain. This is something we all need to bear in mind over the next five and a half weeks before the election.
Those with vested political interests will scheme and manipulate in almost any way that suits their purposes. We’re already seeing it happen.
Consider the manufactured outrage we’ve already seen over a couple of incidents. Firstly the “f**k John Key” chant recorded at an Internet Mana rally. This is not necessarily the degradation of society and an all time low in politics that some would have us believe. Believe it or not it’s actually not all that unusual for those of the younger generation to use coarse language about their political leaders. It’s been happening for generations. I recall chasing the then Tertiary Education Minister Lockwood Smith around Canterbury University campus back in the 1990s. The language we used was not exactly complimentary and was generally similarly used on any visiting government minister. Just ask Ruth Richardson how she was treated by protestors after her “mother of all Budgets”.
Abuse of politicians isn’t respectful, but it’s not unusual.
What is interesting; however, are those who point to the incident as some sort of political Armageddon and a sign of dirty politics of the left. I’m really not convinced that Cameron Slater can claim any moral high ground here, nor can David Farrar. It’s really a bit rich for someone who ran a billboard campaign against the Electoral Finance Act that compared then Prime Minister Helen Clark to totalitarian leaders to be drawing comparisons between the Internet Party, Dotcom, and Hitler. Dotcom may be many things (and some of them reasonably unsavoury) but to draw parallels between him and one of the most reviled figures of the 20th century is simply ludicrous.
No it isn’t ludicrous Felix, those billboards were legitimate political debate around an issue, the erosion of freedom of speech by a implementation of a draconian law enacted by a morally corrupt government sensitive to criticism. It was a policy debate not a ranty chant from a Fat German Crook. Clark was acting like a totalitarian, and so she got compared to other dictators.
Bear in mind the footage that raised so much ire had been floating around for at least a fortnight and had been previously reported on. Where was the outrage and criticism then? Or was it a deliberate strategy to draw attention away from the other hot story of the day – foreign ownership of New Zealand land?
It was floating around for weeks, but the mainstream media ignored it, swept it under the carpet, pretending desperately that it wasn’t a story. Unfortunately it was. The traditional filters from the media are now gone. News is what people think is news not what tired journalists in the Press Galley think is news. Read more »
On Firstline yesterday David Cunliffe gave us all a demonstration in weapons grade making stuff up.
At 3:00 he says that:
“The Prime Minister is responsible for the lowest standards of Ministerial conduct that I can remember in my time in Parliament, bar none”.
What about Labour’s Taito Phillip Field, the only ever MP found guilty of corruption?
When he was in the dock, David Cunliffe, Helen Clark and Michael Cullen all went into bat for him saying that “all Taito is guilty of is working hard for his constituents”.
Lockwood Smith, at the time, issued this press release:
National Party Immigration spokesman Lockwood Smith says the Labour Government has “stooped to a new low” with its efforts to avoid accountability over the Taito Phillip Field fiasco.
“The Immigration Minister, David Cunliffe, is now refusing to answer legitimate questions about warning notes and telephone calls by Immigration Department staff to the Minister’s office.
“Those messages focused on the fact that Thai overstayers, who were later given visas on special Ministerial direction, were working for Taito Phillip Field while he was advocating on their behalf. Read more »
I blogged last week about Green MPs and their blubbing over lobbying. I alluded to there being two MPs who enjoyed the company of a lobbyist and her client at parliament despite the calls from their leader to unleash the disinfecting powers of sunlight.
Yesterday Holly Walker blogged again about lobbyists without any mention of the fact at least two Green MPs enjoy the company of lobbyists from time to time:
International best practice is to have a publically available register of lobbyists so that the public knows everyone – not just those who have a special swipe-card – who is seeking to influence decision makers about what.
If our parliament is really as open and accessible as everyone says, there should be no need for particular individuals to have swipe card access. Read more »
QUEEN’S BIRTHDAY HONOURS 2013
To be a Member of the said Order:
Emeritus Professor Albert Wendt, CNZM
For services to New Zealand
To be a Dame Companion of the said Order:
Mrs Ngāneko Kaihau Minhinnick, JP
For services to Māori and conservation
To be Knights Companion of the said Order:
The Honourable Robert Stanley Chambers
(Deceased. This appointment took effect on 20 May 2013; Her Majesty’s approval having been signified before the date of decease.)
For services to the judiciary
Mr John Stratton Davies, QSO
For services to business and tourism
Dr The Right Honourable Alexander Lockwood Smith
For services as a Member of Parliament and as Speaker of the House of Representatives
Mr Gordon Frederick Tietjens, CNZM
For services to rugby Read more »
Grant Robertson has failed in four years to deliver a single National minister’s head. This may seem a brutal measure of success, and it is, but aspiring leaders need to deliver heads.
The usual approach to delivering a head is to put a minister under so much pressure that they crack. This starts with lots of written questions, and is supported by ruthless questioning in question time, so every time a minister stands up their side all cringe. Read more »
Nick Smith is lobbying hard for his reinstatement ‘advising’ the Prime Minister through the media that he thinks his gardening leave should end.
A refreshed Nick Smith says while his time on “gardening leave” has been good in parts, “my advice to the prime minister is ‘the garden is done’.”
If anyone other than a Bill English club member did that they’d have Wayne Eagleson whispering in their ears about how their career could be impacted by their impertinence.
Chris Finalyson is perhaps the best Arts Minister one could find in the world. He loathes pretentious art.
The Parliamentary Art Collection, value $12 million, includes an artwork in shagpile that can only be described as a piece of its time.
That time is 1981 – the year of the underarm bowling scandal, the Springbok Tour, and the first hints of the trend that shoulder pads and big hair will become. The piece, Variation in Apricot, is considered ‘textile art’. It reportedly feels like touching a dirty dog.
Arts Minister Chris Finlayson’s immediate reaction is sotto voce: “S***, that’s awful.”
Then he gets closer and sees the plaque that says it was donated by the National Party caucus wives in 1981 – when Robert Muldoon was the Prime Minister.
“Oh my God,” he says, shamefaced at slighting the taste of such a group of women. He slams into reverse and hunts for a more diplomatic adjective than ‘awful.’
“It certainly is a unique contribution to the art collection in Parliament.
I couldn’t think of better lighting for it. It has been very carefully thought through.”
It is in a dark corridor of Parliament, in an area where no members of the public and few MPs would go.
There are other insults: Read more »