The science supports Maggie Barry’s death to cats policy.
The science supports Maggie Barry’s death to cats policy.
Whaleoil Politician of the Week Maggie Barry is National’s designated Winston antidote.
So it is not surprising that Winston gives her a good kick in the arse over her cat policy.
Ms Barry says the SPCA’s practice of catching cats, spaying them and setting them free – is counterproductive.
“What I’d like to see the SPCA do is if they catch a wild cat, to put them down in a humane way.” Read more »
Phil Quin is bemused by Maggie Barry’s death wish on cats.
What concerns me is this: why on earth does a NZ government have the power to tell its citizen how many cats they can own?
These debates happen all the time in NZ. Let’s ban this, or restrict that – often in response to some moral panic brought on by the confluence of more than one newspaper article on a given subject.
Our unwritten constitution often seem to offer carte blanche to governments to regulate, ban, restrict anything they like, apparently on a whim.
Kiwis love to bash the U.S.; mock its gun culture, for example, and the extremes of its politics. But, living there for several years, I came to respect the limited nature of constitutional government – and the fact that, at state and federal level, there are courts whose job it is to determine where governments have committed overreach. Cat fanciers in America would have a law such as that proposed by Barry struck down in minutes. In fact, no government would even propose it, knowing that it couldn’t pass constitutional muster. Read more »
NZ Newswire reported Ms Barry said she had spoken about [Prime Minister’s cat] Moonbeam to Mr Key and knew she was kept locked inside at night.
Mr Key said limiting cats was Ms Barry’s personal view rather than the Government’s.
“Some people are going to have lots of cats and some people are going to have few. The Government isn’t going to limit the number of cats people can own.”
Ms Barry was speaking from bird sanctuary Zealandia. Read more »
via the tipline
This email has been leaked to us and it shows that the tree hugger, eco-terrorists who trespassed and destroyed a couples private property rights were lying about the tree.
It is from Julie Bevan the General Manager Resource Consents for Council and bolded highlights were added by WOBH.
From: Julie Bevan
Sent: Monday, 16 March 2015 5:02 p.m.
To: GRP AC Resource Consenting – All Resource Consenting
Subject: Information about kauri tree issue last week
Most of you will have seen or read the media coverage on the issue of the kauri tree at Paturoa Rd in Titirangi last week, in which the decision to give consent to fell the tree to clear a building platform was hotly debated. As always, a lot of context and accurate information was missing. Here’s a summary of what happened:
Two resource consents were granted by Independent Commissioners for the construction of two houses on adjoining sites in Titirangi. The sites are bush-clad and are zoned Bush Living – which is a residential zoning in the Waitakere section of the District Plan. It is also a Significant Ecological Area under the Unitary Plan and the removal of vegetation and trees for an access way and building platform is provided for within this overlay.
When the consent application involving the section with the kauri tree was processed, the council had communication with the local board and received the opinion of two separate arborists, ecologists, a landscape architect and an engineer. The applicant contacted iwi. Careful consideration was given to a range of options for locating the building platform that would cause the least impact on the bush, and ensuring the shortest driveway to minimise effects, etc. Read more »
Rodney Hide calmly explains the wrongs of the kauri eco-terrorists int he Herald on Sunday.
Quick, whack your old trees down. Otherwise you run the risk of having MP David Cunliffe living up it and being bossed about from New York by former Prime Minister Helen Clark. Supermodel Rachel Hunter will weigh in with obscenities on Facebook: that’s because you fail to appreciate the “life force” your tree holds.
That’s what has happened to architect John Lenihan and his family. They were going about the lawful enjoyment of their Titirangi property, including chopping down their old kauri. It was theirs. They bought it. But no matter. They had to be stopped.
They had protesters outside their property, a fellow living up the tree, a nationwide media furore and everyone from the UN down telling them they were greedy and evil. They received death threats.
No one said what the Lenihans were doing was illegal but plenty of people were screaming abuse and happy to break the law.
The dispute could have been resolved peacefully by the protesters digging deep and buying the property. Rachel Hunter could afford it. So, too, could Helen Clark. And David Cunliffe.
Politicians are a scary prospect at times.
We vote for them to run our cities and country and it appears that they don’t understand the law one bit.
If you’re gonna be a politician – at least get to know the laws of the land just so you don’t look like a prize goose when you mouth off about an issue or try to look like you’re doing something about it.
The Great Titirangi Kauri Tree caper has to be one of those moments when we collectively wonder just how bright our civic and national leaders are.
They all rushed out there, held meetings and expressed concern for the said tree, whilst openly stating they were trying to do something about it.
The fact is, there was and is no legal grounds on which they politicians could resolve the issue.
The Resource Consent can’t be revoked. Most likely a Judicial Review on process would fail to pass the required threshold test to succeed and so everyone was powerless to do anything at all. Read more »
Fairfax’s intrepid reporters Andrea Vance and Deidre Mussen have been briefed by the wet faction, led by John Key, inside National against new corrections minister Sam Lotu-Iiga.
Meanwhile, Beehive sources report the office of Corrections Minister Sam Lotu-Iiga is in “meltdown”, with Police Minister Michael Woodhouse ordered to front any media interviews.
Woodhouse is on his way to Wellington for meetings with officials this afternoon.
“Sam is nowhere to be seen,” the source said.
When you see statements like this the one thing you have to ask is cui bono? Who benefits?
Sources inside parliament are suggesting that the very wet Nikki Kaye and her office are briefing against Lotu-Iiga, as well as Maggie Barry as they are both Auckland based and a threat to Nikki Kaye’s chances of moving up the cabinet ranks. Read more »
On her appointment as a minister, NZ’s favourite grandmother, Maggie Barry, had this to say:
But Barry, a member of National’s “blue greens” sector group, takes her eco credentials seriously as a gardener.
“From garden show days . . . as well as to this day I try not to spray anything. I have been known to use the odd herbicide when I had a bigger garden . . . but I figured early on in the piece I didn’t really want to grow the things that needed spraying every 10 days.”
But within days she was telling Auckland Council that if they didn’t dump tonnes of 1080 poison all over the Hunuas, into Auckland’s water catchment areas, that she would force them to do so.
She told TVNZ Breakfast, as reported int eh NZ Herald:
“These are the kinds of challenges that I’m starting to come to grips with at the moment. We have to get our predators under control so we do need 1080.” Read more »
The other day Maggie Barry gobbed off about 1080 being dumped all over the water catchment areas for Auckland in the Hunua Ranges.
She thought it was perfectly alright to dump poison into our water system.
Now we find out that the Council has been dumping weed killer intot he water and that the water has been essentially quarantined.
Two dams in the Hunua Ranges which supply about 20 per cent of Auckland’s water were closed for four months this year after traces of a toxic herbicide applied to nearby forestry blocks got into the dams’ supply lakes.
Last night, Watercare Services said there was no risk to public health.
Auckland Council was told of the incident, but both the council and Watercare Services kept it quiet from the public until a whistleblower contacted the Herald yesterday.
Watercare communications manager John Redwood said the public were not notified because “we were confident there was no risk of water from the lakes being drawn into the supply network at any time”.
After a forestry block on council land in the Cosseys, Wairoa and Mangatawhiri dam catchments was sprayed on May 12, Watercare detected traces of the herbicide metsulfuron-methyl in the Cosseys and Wairoa lakes.
Metsulfuron-methyl is a residual toxic herbicide used to kill broadleaf weeds and some annual grasses.
Watercare said the likely cause was run-off from surrounding blocks as a result of unexpected heavy rain two days after spraying. GPS tracking by helicopter confirmed spray was not applied to the lake areas.