Labour has released yet another Christchurch policy that is so totally ill thought through it is stunning to think it made its way through the Labour Party policy council.
Why bother having insurance if the taxpayer is going to bail you out. The Labour Party is bribing voters in their hundreds so they can still hide behind the fig leaf that is they are fiscally responsible.
Labour would offer to buy all¬†red-zoned bare land at the full 2007 rateable value.
The Government is offering to buy out uninsured properties at 50 per cent of the land value.
Canterbury Earthquake Recovery Spokesperson Ruth Dyson said the policy was not only affordable, but the “right thing to do”.
“A 100 per cent buy-out offer is the right thing to do for people who were unable to obtain insurance cover on bare-land or commercial properties before the earthquakes.”
Dyson said it would cost $23.4 million – “a drop in the ocean in the context of the rebuild”. ¬† Read more »
Despite David Shearer’s order to Ban the Man Ban, the Labour wimmin are still pushing ahead with discussions about it.
It would seem that they intend to ignore David Shearer.
New Zealand Labour Party President Moira Coatsworth invites you to join her and the Labour Women’s Council for our Conference this coming weekend.
Interested in building womens leadership by supporting other women or taking a step up yourself? There is still an opportunity to take part in this important and exciting conference.
On Friday¬†you can join Labour MPs Nanaia Mahuta, Sue Moroney, Carol Beaumont and Moana Mackey for a special community event – Building for Habitat for Humanity.¬† Read more »
The dismal opinion poll ratings for Labour a few weeks back charged the Tory’s political arsenal. Every time the hapless, Dithering David Shearer stood up in Parliament’s bear pit to ask State Homie John Key whether he stood by all his statements, the volley began.
Of course he stood by the statements he’d been making to his fellow conspirators that The Ditherer’s days were numbered.
It was ‘head on the plate stuff’, but this week it’ll be carcass on the spit with Labour’s so called man-ban, where they’ll consider standing only women in some electorates to get a gender balance. Shearer was quick to distance himself from the feral feminists but he does lead a Party where the idea’s been entertained.
Currently they’ve got 14 women and 20 men MPs, even if the media had to point out the correct figures to them. So why do they want more women? Well there could be two reasons for that, to improve on the talent, or lack of it, that they’ve already got or to Morris dance with The Kermits who’re committed to the gender balance. ¬† Read more »
A little more on Labour’s Man ban. Labour’s Electorate selection panels are controlled by HQ – just ask David Benson-Pope what happened to him when his HQ wanted him gone and Clare Curran selected. They have 3 people on the panel. So HQ only needs 2 people voting for want it wants. The National Party, by way of contrast, has selections by 60 or more delegates, depending on the local electorate’s membership numbers. So, what Labour is now saying is that they:
1. don’t have faith that under Labour selections women will get selected and
2. don’t have faith that under Labour, their hand-picked 3 person selection panel will choose women.
Surely, the people of New Zealand have a right to expect that a party that sees itself as an alternative government will put more effort into selecting candidates who can represent people no matter what their gender. As an electorate MP, it would be bizarre if I felt that I could only represent the women in the Papakura electorate. Perhaps Labour’s wrong thinking is because so few Labour MPs – particularly women MPs represent electorates. In the Northern Region (Northland through to Auckland) there are 4 National women electorate MPs and no Labour women electorate MPs. In the Central North Island region, Labour holds no General Electorates. They now hold 2 Maori seats represented by women, Nanaia Mahuta, as MP for Tainui and Meka Whaititi for Ikatoa Rawhiti.
Annette King is the only Labour women electorate MP in Lower North Island.
In the South Island, there are currently 2 women electorate MPs in Canterbury : Ruth Dyson and Lianne Dalziel. The other woman Labour MP is Clare Curran for Dunedin South.¬† Read more »
Just when the country imagined women were doing well in politics, particularly in the Labour Party, the party’s organisational wing says they are not. It is so worried that women do not yet fill half the party’s seats in Parliament it might allow electorates to ban males from selection as the Labour candidate. Predictably, the “man ban” has been ridiculed from all sides but if Labour wants to do it, why not?
The party’s former president Mike Williams offered one reason: “It’s discrimination, there are human rights issues.” Certainly it is discrimination, the kind of “positive discrimination” that Labour parties believe in. Another red-blooded male, MP Shane Jones, said, “Last time I checked it was the blue-collar, tradie, blokey voters we were missing”, implying they will not vote for a woman. ¬† Read more »
I’m told there were six of them, and that they hunted as a pack. Their prey?
Delegates who had voted the wrong way.
Moving through the excited crowds at the Ellerslie Conference Centre last November, an angry group of Labour MPs was seen taking dissidents aside and telling them, in no uncertain terms, which way was up.
Leading the pack was Labour’s employment relations spokeswoman, Darien Fenton, and her grim lieutenant, Dunedin South MP Clare Curran.
No surprises there. Ms Fenton and Ms Curran were among the caucus members most alarmed by the Labour Party rank-and-files’ sudden outbreak of democratic distemper. The other members of the pack, however, came as a surprise.
I had never thought of Jacinda Ardern, Megan Woods, Kris Faafoi or Phil Twyford as attack dogs, but my sources assure me that they were there – chewing people out. So what?
Such brutal vignettes are the stock-and-trade of party conferences. Certainly “The Pack” was far from being the only example of caucus aggression at the Ellerslie conference.
Fairly specific details…but there is more:¬† Read more »
Chippie is on fire, he has the details and Hekia is trying to dodge the questions.
Under pressure Hekia looks dreadful. Shifty, uncomfortable and out of her depth, not strong and in control of her portfolio. She is only in control when reading a set script answering a patsy question from Nicky Wagner at the very end of the skewering Chippie initiated. Megan Woods needs to get her act together, you could see the relief when Hekia wasn‚Äôt answering to Chippie.
Readers may wonder why this matters. Question time is where ministers are held to account, and Chippie is doing that bloody well. Hekia will not be looking forward to going into question time because she knows she is getting shown up by a man who she regards as her inferior.
Pressure leads to mistakes. Chippie is building the kind of pressure that causes a Minister to make a really bad mistake. Hekia has made a heap of mistakes already, and you can see the National MPs cringing when she is under the cosh in the house.