These would appear ¬†to be very handy for sorting out the Chinese.
I’ll bet when Winton reads this he will make them a bottom-line for his coalition negotiations.
Zach Rosenberg at¬†Killer Apps explains¬†about some cool new toys.
In the past few weeks, the Pentagon and its major contractors have been trotting out their designs for the aircraft of the future — from a stealthy, hypersonic¬†spy plane¬†to a combat,¬†carrier-hopping drone¬†to a¬†futuristic bomber. But ironically, none of these planes will likely define the U.S. armed forces of, say, 2030. It’s the wild weapons they’ll carry that could be military game-changers.
The crown jewel is the¬†Long Range Strike-Bomber¬†(LRS-B), being designed under tight secrecy. LRS-B is supposed to replace either¬†the B-52¬†or¬†B-1¬†or some combination thereof (nobody’s quite sure yet). Designed for penetrating strike and nuclear weapons, it is this bomber that is meant to lead any bombing campaign, slipping into enemy airspace undetected and dropping bombs on the most heavily-defended targets. Northrop Grumman (which designed the B-2) and a Boeing-Lockheed team are both designing competitors, but details are scarce — nearly everything about the program is classified.
The hypersonic missiles are cool too.
[M]issiles are going to be smarter and capable of new things, not just blowing things up. Rather than risk people and valuable airplanes, why not just let the missile do the work? It’s getting easier to pack missiles full of fuel and electronics, making them more like miniature drones than the old dumb-bombs. Some missiles, like Raytheon’s new¬†MALD-J, contain small radar jammers and can be fired almost 600 miles from the target.
Future versions could have electronic surveillance equipment, sending data back home, or even the means to inject viruses into computer networks. Also look forward to things like the Israeli¬†IAI Harop, a hybrid missile/UAV that can circle overhead for long periods of time, waiting for a whiff of electronic scent and guiding itself in.
One promising development is the¬†High-Speed Strike Weapon, a hypersonic ground attack missile, capable of launching from thousands of miles away and streaking towards the target too fast for anyone to hit. At least, that’s the idea. At that speed it might not even need a warhead, destroying targets with sheer kinetic energy. The program is in its infancy, and sustained hypersonic flight is very tough — but we’ll see. Come 2030 there could be B-52s — among the oldest aircraft in the inventory — launching hypersonic cruise missiles by the dozen.
I think we should be looking at drones…and I’m not talking about officers straight out of Basic Training either.
And what of the drones used so widely today? After Afghanistan winds down there will certainly not be a need for as many as we now have. But a potential¬†Predator¬†replacement, the MQ-X, is dead in the water, and while the USAF is closely watching the Navy’s experiments with the X-47B carrier-hopping drone, there are no concrete plans to buy anything at the moment. But it’s hard to imagine they wouldn’t put those new capabilities onto UAVs, and indeed there are persistent rumors of secret bomb-carrying UAVs flying in the desert, but nothing concrete and verifiable has yet emerged.
If I was advising Winston then I’d say make the drone ¬†bottom line and the give-way can be the hyperspnic missiles…you can still fire older style missile from the drones and their bang is much better for the buck.