Lobbyists and opposition political parties are welcoming the idea of light rail through some of Auckland’s main arterial routes.
Auckland Transport says it’s investigating whether light rail on Queen St, Symonds St, Sandringham Rd, Dominion Rd, Mt Eden Rd and Manukau Rd is a good alternative to buses.
Most of those routes had trams running on them before they were removed in the 1950s.
Auckland Transport chairman Lester Levy says light rail could move more than three times the number of people per hour than buses, and at higher speeds, and would complement other projects like the City Rail Link rather than replace it.
He says a public private partnership could be a good way to fund it. Read more »
If I provide data to a newspaper (and they’ve even won awards off of the back of that info) it is dirty politics, but when a politician does it the Herald journalist takes it and runs a negative hit job on the government and it is business as usual.
Despite figures showing a massive increase in elective surgery since National took over the NZ Herald decides to put NZ First’s negative spin onÂ theÂ headline and the article.
And don’t you just love the weaselly way they introduce the fact that it was NZ First who slipped them the numbers.
The Government’s much-publicised increase in hip, knee and other elective operations has been questioned in light of data which appeared to show the proportion of people missing out on treatment was growing.
But officials say growing waiting lists and a rising number of patients leaving hospital untreated do not tell the whole story.
The number of patients getting elective surgery has steadily increased over the past decade – especially after it was made a national health target in 2007. Since National came to power in 2008, the number of operations has lifted from 118,000 to 162,000 a year.
However, data released under the Official Information Act shows the proportion of patients on waiting lists who were leaving hospital untreated was also rising over the same period. As many as 30 per cent on waiting lists in some regions had their operation delayed or cancelled.
At Auckland District Health Board, there was a waiting list of 27,200 people for elective surgery last year. Of that number, 4558 patients – nearly 20 per cent – were admitted but left hospital without treatment. Last year up to November, 3822 patients out of 22,346 left untreated.
The Waikato Times has been slammed by the Press Council for their front page fiction about Young Nats burning Nicky Hager’s Dirty Politics, a story gathered by their “news” team from the Facebook page of a NZ First activist.
The Press Council recognises that social media are a frequent source of information that can be checked and developed into stories capable of meeting the standards of accuracy, fairness and balance expected by readers of a reliable newspaper.
In this case the Council does not believe the newspaper had sufficient corroboration of the claim on Facebook. The Timesâ€™ additional source, a student who would not be named, claimed to have seen Mr Letcher with more than 200 books. If that statement were true, it does not establish that Mr Letcher intended to burn them.
The Facebook posting as reported by the Times, said, â€śSo apparently the CNI Young Nats (and presumably the NZ Young Nats) are buying up copies of Nicky Hagerâ€™s # Dirty Politics….and burning them.â€ť The word â€śapparentlyâ€ť should be noted. It suggests the information was at best hearsay, at worst an assumption by a person associated with a rival political party.
The Times called it â€śrumourâ€ť but its report also claimed to have confirmed part of the rumour. It is therefore difficult to accept the Regional Editor’s response that the paper was merely reporting an allegation. Its confidence in its own source and its decision to splash the book burning allegation across its front page would have given the story credibility in the minds of some readers.
While Mr Letcherâ€™s denial was also reported prominently, this does not redeem the report. Newspapers need to be careful when dealing with rumour that is denied. A false accusation can easily be made for the purpose of forcing a political opponent to deny it publicly. That indeed is said to be a device of â€śdirty politicsâ€ť. Newspapers should take care to ensure they are not unwitting instruments of it.
The Waikato Times could not substantiate this rumour to a standard that meets the Press Councilâ€™s principles of accuracy and fairness. Mr Letcherâ€™s complaint is upheld.
I tried to run this as an important story about an MP breaking the law at the time, but the media were so pre-occupied with their own little games, it allowed Winston Peters to duck quite the controversy. Â It may have earned him a few percentage points for the final party vote.
Former NZ First MPÂ AsenatiÂ Lole-Taylor inappropriately accessed the criminalÂ records of a former party official, the Department of Corrections has confirmed.
Dennis Taylor, her husband, lost his job last month after an investigation found he looked up historic convictions of NZ First’s former director andÂ ManaÂ electorate chairwomanÂ MariseÂ Bishop.
Now, in a letter to Bishop, Corrections has revealed the investigation foundÂ Lole-Taylor, who was a rehabilitationÂ and reintegration services adviser at the time, also broke the rules.
But because she quit Corrections after becoming a list MP in 2011, they can take no action. Read more »
What was all the fuss about?
What if you’re black, JewishÂ and gay? Â Ok? Â How about if you’re Â United Future party leader? Â Read more »
AMONG his constituency â€“ particularly the grey vote â€“ he has cultivated a huge reservoir of brand loyalty and trust. If you heard it once on the campaign trail you heard it a thousand times. Winston will see us oldies right.
But whether voters will ever come to believe that of the largely unrecognisable faces behind Peters is questionable. Â Peters has not helped NZ Firstâ€™s cause â€“ or the chances of it surviving as his legacy â€“ by reinventing his caucus every three years.
Partly that is due to NZ Firstâ€™s highs and lows. Its ranks were decimated after the 1999 election, and again in 2008, when it was turfed out of Parliament altogether. But Peters has also alienated many of his caucus along the way. Of the partyâ€™s original MPs, only Ron Mark remains â€“ and that only after several years out of Parliament, when Mark even mulled standing for another party.
Markâ€™s return appears to be the first serious attempt by Peters to put in place a succession plan.
Judging by Mark’s performance during question time, he’s either no longer match fit or he’s seriously lost the plot.
Lifestyle, arts and travel blogger David Farrar is away again.
Kiwiblog has again reverted to a blog of David’s mid-life crisis and travels.
Not content with his own travel blogging, he also now has guest travel blog posts.
However he does have a guest post from Kiwi in America that is very good. Why is it Kiwiblog’s best posts are while he is away?
Regular readers of Kiwiblog will recall my lengthy essay posted on Easter Friday about the recent history of Labour; some of it based on my time as an activist there until the mid 90â€™s attempting to explain Labourâ€™s present day conundrum.
In a nutshell it said that an attempt by the left of the party to seize permanent control of Labour after the massive post Rogernomics ructions under the leadership of Helen Clark, led to a gradual purging of activists from the centrist and right wings of the party. Clark, and her followers in the Head Office and regional hierarchies, ensured the selection of candidates in winnable electorate seats (and after the introduction of MMP, also the party list) that not only ensured she could topple then leader Mike Moore after the 1993 election but also cemented her power base inside Labour guaranteeing her an unchallenged 15 year reign as Labourâ€™s leader. This handed power in the party to an increasingly narrow base of sector and interest groups such as academics, trade unions, progressive feminists and the rainbow coalition gradually driving out activists who were more likely to be white, male, socially conservative, small business owners and church going people of faith. After Labourâ€™s 2008 election defeat, former members of the harder left New Labour Party, homeless after the dissolution of the Alliance, the demise of Andertonâ€™s Progressives and the rise of the Greens, began to come back to Labour assisting in the movement of the party more to the left.
This trend culminated in the amendment to Labourâ€™s Constitution at its 2012 Annual Conference giving 40% of the vote for Party Leader to the party membership and 20% to the affiliated unions leaving only 40% in the hands of the Parliamentary caucus. This new formula enabled David Cunliffe to win the first full leadership primary in 2013 despite having only minority support in caucus â€“ the first time this had ever happened in Labourâ€™s history. The result of his elevation to the leadership was Labourâ€™s third successive and even more disastrous defeat.
When you drive out of the party its more centrist activists, you leave a vacuum that has been filled by harder left activists. When these same activists, alongside the more traditionally left wing trade union leadership, have control of the partyâ€™s candidate selections, its policy formation and now the election of its leader, over time you end up with a party, candidates and policies that no longer appeal to middle NZ and a party that is no longer the broad church it used to be. The party may be truer to its left wing principles but it now produces candidates, policies and campaigning rhetoric out of step with the aspirations of floating middle NZ voters that decide elections. Nationalâ€™s moderate centrist direction under John Key has become the natural repository for various key demographic groups that once used to strongly vote Labour and accordingly, Labour has ended up falling further behind National in each subsequent election post its 2008 defeat culminating in its second lowest vote this election since its formation in 1916!
Labour is now undertaking yet another review of why it was defeated and another likely more bruising leadership primary.
Curwen Rollinson is a NZ First activist and former board member, he is also an arch socialist who like to dress in 1940s army clothes.
He writes occaisonal TL;DR rants at The Daily Blog, and today has a post about creating a “civil society”.
I’ve read it so you don’t have to, but here is his main thrust:
Itâ€™s my contention that just as civil society was able to propel environmentalism along with widespread concern for privacy rights and opposition to mass surveillance into the political limelight previously; thereâ€™s now a present need and vacancy for civil society to do something similar with economic nationalism.
Preaching about a “civil society”…hmmm, civil like this?
Good on Ron Mark, he has resigned as Carterton’s mayor so he won’t be a double dipper.
It does cause a by-election but that is the price of electing someone who won;t double dip.
Ron Mark is to step down as Carterton mayor today.
Having been returned to Parliament on Saturday on the New Zealand First Party list, Mark told Wairarapa News yesterday he would resign as mayor.
He was expected to tender his resignation at this morning’s full council meeting. Doing so will force a by-election with the vacant mayoral position going to a district-wide postal vote. Â Read more »
Get used to it: Â Winston Peters will be part of the government come September 20.
The problem is, he won’t tell you which side he’ll back.
In fact, he’s just as likely to go with Labour. Â After all, they are operating an open chequebook election, whereas National is trying to come off as much more responsible.
If you want to boot the National Government out next Saturday why on earth would you vote for Winston Peters and NZ First?
On the other hand, if you want to keep National in power after the election, why would you opt for Peters and his party?
The truth is you wouldn’t.
If you want certainty Peters doesn’t come into it.
Voting for Peters is a big, blind, gamble: he won’t tell you what he plans to do.
He claims that’s up to voters to decide. Rubbish. Read more »