NZEI

School using their own kids for a union organised anti-government protest

A parent wrote in to complain

My 5 yo came home from school today, very excited about¬†tomorrow’s Purple-themed mufti day.

Not knowing anything about it, we¬†checked out the school Facebook page and discover the attached¬†“clarification” message from Rangiora Borough School Principal, Alan¬†Sutton, advising that it’s to “support the union‚Äôs protest over the¬†purpose of the scheduled $359 million Investing in Success‚Äô¬†project”.

My boy is now very disappointed that he can’t participate in the Mufti¬†Day.¬†I’m appalled that a school would use my child as a pawn in their¬†political agenda!

I’m not generally outspoken, have been reading your site for about 6¬†months but have only commented once or twice.¬†But this has angered me, so I had to share it with you, and will be¬†writing to the Principal to share my outrage.

A bit of checking around with other schools makes it clear that the Purple Themed Day¬†is really just meant to be for unionised staff. ¬†The fact that Rangiora Borough School have extended this to a “mufti day” for the kids (remember some are as young as FIVE) without telling the parents this is a highly political move is just plain shameful.

This was posted on the school’s Facebook page after the parents raised a stink over their kids being used in this way: ¬† Read more »

This is how the Teacher Unions get the answers they want

qweqew

Not all teachers are rabid unionists.  Which is why I get told about these sorts of dirty tricks.

How many teachers would have voted NO on that? ¬†Seriously…

If you need a reminder on how questionnaires can be manipulated to get the result you want, here’s a classic Yes Prime Minister clip that explains it. ¬† Read more »

Parents not the Village Idiots Labour/Unions think they are

Labour and the teacher unions spend their whole time treating the parents of school age children like they have IQs lower than a jam sandwich.

Examples are ignoring the benefits of National Standards (they are going to ban them of course), telling families in challenges areas that they don’t want Charter Schools (they are going to ban them of course), telling parents they will save $100 on donations – while charging them $3.50 a week for a “device”, etc.

Parents have clearly also seen through the – slap a few more teachers in the classroom (wherever they come from) and she’ll be right approach too.

New Zealanders would rather money was spent on improving teaching standards than on reducing class sizes, a Herald-DigiPoll survey reveals.

Education has become a political battleground before September’s election, with both major parties promising to spend hundreds of millions of dollars on it.

Asked about their priorities, more than 60 per cent of those polled said they would spend money on trying to improve teaching standards rather than cutting class sizes.¬† Read more »

Couldn’t Labour find a NZ classroom for their photos?

The NZEI are staunch supporters of the Labour party, even helping them write their education policy.

You would think that Labour would have been easily able to source a Kiwi classroom image for their election messaging wouldn’t you?

Here is David Cunliffe pushing his lie about removing school fees.

The background photo isn‚Äôt from a Kiwi classroom. ¬† Read more »

Performance pay for teachers: Has the time come?

Labour may have done their friends at the NZIE and PPTA a disservice. ¬†By pushing really hard for more teachers, 2000 of them in fact, and quoting smaller class sizes as being the major factor in student success, it turns out the public aren’t buying the argument

Newstalk ZB on-line poll

Newstalk ZB on-line poll

It appears to be that the voters can see that better teachers are the ones that produce better results, not just more average ones giving you ¬†3-4% more attention… that’s if you actually get an extra teacher, because 2000 teachers isn’t even one per school.

The left have been very successful at making certain phrases sound scary to voters, and “bulk funding” and “performance pay” are two of them.

This is why National are using the teachers’ award system against the unions. ¬† Read more »

Labour’s flagship education policy is stillborn

Labour are truly bereft of original ideas, and they keep going back to the standard:  spend more money to solve a problem.

As we’ve often said, because Labour make it so necessary to say it, if spending more money solved problems, we could spend ourselves into health, prosperity and zero unemployment.

We all know it doesn’t work that way.

On the face of it 2000 extra teachers sounds like a great idea, until you think it through. ¬†Forget the actual cost of it right now, that’s the least of the problems with this policy.

Where are these 2000 teachers coming from?

Teachers colleges turn out several hundred a year.  So Cunliffe says old, tired, disillusioned teachers are going to be attracted to the profession.   And he will be looking at immigrants.

Let’s break that down a little further. ¬†Teachers that have given up on teaching already will need to be “encouraged”, but the whole payment and reward system of the teaching profession is diametrically opposed to anyone being paid even once cent more than anyone else with the same qualifactions, experience and responsibilities.

So, they won’t be getting any more money. ¬†It flies against everything the teachers unions stand for. ¬†Equality in everything, and all that.

So if you aren’t going to be able to pay or reward these teachers for coming back, what form will Labour incentives take?

These teachers coming back are disillusioned or retired. How are they going to hit the ground running with iPads, chromebooks, WiFi Internet?

These teachers coming back are disillusioned or retired. How are their colleagues going to accept them?  How would you like to be perceived as a burnt-out, disillusioned, retired teacher that only came back for whatever Labour is going to use to incentivise them?

How are your colleagues going to treat you, knowing you walked away from them in the past? ¬†You rejected the profession then, what’s changed? ¬†A Labour bribe?
Read more »

Waikato Times editorial slaps Hipkins too

Hipkins! ...eyes front and pay attention!

Hipkins! …cut the jibber jabber, eyes front and pay attention!

Chris Hipkins has tried to bag National Investing in Education Success (IES) plans as he goes about his ban-a-thon.

The Waikato Times have also acknowledged that he doesn’t know what he is talking about it and has failed to even notice the PPTA support.

Hipkins’ report card on Parata’s handling of the policy said a Labour Government would “almost certainly” dump it. Labour’s own model (to be announced within the next two weeks) would draw on teacher expertise to improve educational outcomes. But, according to the PPTA, that’s what Parata has done – and it welcomes the results.

Labour’s education spokesman, Chris Hipkins, has given Education Minister Hekia Parata a low mark for trying to introduce the expert teachers policy, “Investing in Educational Success”.

Because of the lack of input from school leaders, he said, she “has failed spectacularly” and “clearly needs to go back to school to learn what consultation actually means”. But perhaps Hipkins has failed to assess all the relevant material. Earlier this month, Parata released a report on the shaping of the $359 million policy to create a new career structure for teachers after consulting with the education sector.¬† Read more »

Hipkins’ newest policy: Ban IES

"How many houses does your Dad have? What! None? I've got 3, what is he, a loser?"

Don’t worry kid, once I’m in charge, you won’t have to worry about standards

Labour’s brilliant education policy on banning all change and progression in education continues:

  • Ban National Standards
  • Ban Charter Schools (which he refuses to even visit)
  • Ban IES (Investing in Educational Success)

Read more »

Budget over, cue the whingers, here come the teacher unions

What is it with teacher unions and people involved in education?

They constantly have their hands out and when more money, in this case $857 million extra, is spent in their area of the economy they are whining like unpaid hookers that it wasn’t enough.

Early Childhood Council chief executive Peter Reynolds attacked the subsidy increases as a deliberate deception that will push-up charges for parents and reduce quality.

Salaries were a big cost to centres, and the subsidy related to that had increased by less than 1 per cent, Mr Reynolds said, which was below inflation and “another funding cut in drag”.

Ms Parata rejected that, and said ECE care was 33 per cent more affordable as a proportion of household income than 2007. Government spending on the sector had almost doubled since 2007/08.

“Parents can see from the Budget that the Government has allocated over $155 million [extra ECE funding]. That is a significant chunk of change over the next four years.”¬† Read more »

Teacher Unions and Green/Labour Opposition smack down the kids

Despite their attempts at rhetoric to the contrary the union and opposition stance against Charter Schools is looking more and more stupid. Especially the “there is no evidence of success overseas” approach.
Some pieces speak for themselves:

Recently, a leading education research center at Stanford University released a comprehensive study looking at the academic performance of students in public charter schools compared to their traditional school peers in 27 states.

The results of this study deliver promising news for students in Mississippi whose needs are not currently being met, especially for the two-thirds of our public school students who are growing up in poverty. Across the nation, charter school students living in poverty gain the equivalent of an extra 14 days of instruction in reading and 22 days in math each year compared to their traditional public school counterparts. African-American students in poverty who attend charter schools see an even larger gain with the equivalent of an additional 29 days of learning in reading and 36 days in math per year when compared to their traditional public school counterparts.

These findings are not alone. Since 2010, four national studies and 11 regional studies from across the country found similar positive academic performance results.

Of course, the most important measure of a transformational education is whether students are graduating prepared for college and career. How do public charter schools fit in that equation? Mississippians must ask that question, especially considering we have one of the lowest social mobility rates in the nation.

Last month, Mathematica Policy Research announced some preliminary research results that measured the effects of charter schools on long-term educational attainment and subsequent earnings of public charter school students. They found significant evidence that charter schools are increasing educational attainment and are boosting long-term earnings of students ‚ÄĒ ending the cycle of poverty for many low-income students enrolled in charter schools.

Read more »