NZEI

Another Great Charter School ERO Report

So about now the comments will flood in and all the apologies from the NZEI/PPTA patch protectors.

A Northland charter school which was one of the first in the country appears to have passed its first test with flying colours.

The Education Review Office (ERO) report for Te Kura Hourua O Whangarei Terenga Paraoa, released last week, found many areas of the school were doing well and identified just a couple of areas for improvement.

The kura, sponsored by He Puna Marama Charitable Trust, is a co-ed secondary school based in Whangarei that emphasises Maori education.

After initially opening its doors to 50 students on February 27 this year that number grew to 53 students with many more on the waiting list for next year. ¬†¬† Read more »

The refreshed Labour’s bizarre education/poverty views

Maybe being upset at finding out she is spokesperson for nothing Louisa Wall has put out a rather strange and confused education release along with the NZEI.

The confusion starts with the heading:

South Auckland disadvantaged by new decile rankings

Ummm – if comparative socioeconomic markers go down in a location the schools get more money. Does the release mean Labour doesn’t want them to get it?

It then becomes hard to know who is speaking as the release is confused and badly written but one of Wall or NZEI President Judith Nowartaski goes the way of the Bruce McLaren Principal Roy Lilley¬†http://www.whaleoil.co.nz/tag/roy-lilley/ (he of the 416 spare places in his school caused by a Charter School that hasn’t begun yet) and complains about Charter Schools easing financial burdens for families.

‚ÄúFor new Charter Schools to be able to offer free uniforms and stationary will significantly affect the ability of South Auckland schools to match this offer.”

What? Does someone in the Labour party read what they write? Yep – the intent is nonsense but they could at least write a correct sentence.¬† Read more »

When Public Private Partnerships work

It needs to be a community effort to successfully close the digital divide, Hastings Intermediate principal Andrew Shortcliffe says.

He is spearheading the group of 10 schools, following in the footsteps of the Auckland-based Manaiakalani Trust, which provides low-income families with a “financial pathway” to owning digital devices.

With help from the trust, Tamaki College in Auckland was the first state secondary school to go fully digital, in 2012, with more than 600 students using netbooks. The school doubled its NCEA level 2 achievement rates for Maori and Pasifika in its first digital year.

Shortcliffe hopes to see the same results in Hastings schools, and for Ngati Kahungunu and the council to underwrite a trust and support the logistics of the project.

He said community support was crucial, and quoted the adage: “It takes a village to raise a child.”

If a trust were created, it would buy the devices in bulk, which parents could then buy with a deposit and small weekly payments.

The project was about more than just giving children devices, Shortcliffe said. It would also guide parents on how to help their children learn in the digital age.

Parents would be given some basic “digital knowledge” before the children could take the device home.

When the child moved from primary school to intermediate, that device could go with them.

Shortcliffe said the initiative was a “leveller”, and would take down the barriers that some low-income families faced.

Having the East Auckland¬†Manaiakalani experience to draw on shows that throwing tech like iPads and notebooks at kids as young as 5 isn’t necessarily a waste of money and effort, the results speak for themselves. ¬†But where the invisible success takes place is in the community.

There is a much higher engagement by parents who are seeing their children being swept along with both the interest as well as bottom line results, and that in itself becomes a “multiplier” where the community as a whole feels engaged by and with the school.

Parent’s are now clambering to get their children into such schools, and children get the messages from home that the are very lucky to have this opportunity.

Schools going in partnership with private providers as well as charter schools can be a solution for areas where results aren’t met by a one-size-fits-all approach to education. ¬†Results can’t be argued with.

 

– Tracey Chatterton, Dominion Post

School using their own kids for a union organised anti-government protest

A parent wrote in to complain

My 5 yo came home from school today, very excited about¬†tomorrow’s Purple-themed mufti day.

Not knowing anything about it, we¬†checked out the school Facebook page and discover the attached¬†“clarification” message from Rangiora Borough School Principal, Alan¬†Sutton, advising that it’s to “support the union‚Äôs protest over the¬†purpose of the scheduled $359 million Investing in Success‚Äô¬†project”.

My boy is now very disappointed that he can’t participate in the Mufti¬†Day.¬†I’m appalled that a school would use my child as a pawn in their¬†political agenda!

I’m not generally outspoken, have been reading your site for about 6¬†months but have only commented once or twice.¬†But this has angered me, so I had to share it with you, and will be¬†writing to the Principal to share my outrage.

A bit of checking around with other schools makes it clear that the Purple Themed Day¬†is really just meant to be for unionised staff. ¬†The fact that Rangiora Borough School have extended this to a “mufti day” for the kids (remember some are as young as FIVE) without telling the parents this is a highly political move is just plain shameful.

This was posted on the school’s Facebook page after the parents raised a stink over their kids being used in this way: ¬† Read more »

This is how the Teacher Unions get the answers they want

qweqew

Not all teachers are rabid unionists.  Which is why I get told about these sorts of dirty tricks.

How many teachers would have voted NO on that? ¬†Seriously…

If you need a reminder on how questionnaires can be manipulated to get the result you want, here’s a classic Yes Prime Minister clip that explains it. ¬† Read more »

Parents not the Village Idiots Labour/Unions think they are

Labour and the teacher unions spend their whole time treating the parents of school age children like they have IQs lower than a jam sandwich.

Examples are ignoring the benefits of National Standards (they are going to ban them of course), telling families in challenges areas that they don’t want Charter Schools (they are going to ban them of course), telling parents they will save $100 on donations – while charging them $3.50 a week for a “device”, etc.

Parents have clearly also seen through the – slap a few more teachers in the classroom (wherever they come from) and she’ll be right approach too.

New Zealanders would rather money was spent on improving teaching standards than on reducing class sizes, a Herald-DigiPoll survey reveals.

Education has become a political battleground before September’s election, with both major parties promising to spend hundreds of millions of dollars on it.

Asked about their priorities, more than 60 per cent of those polled said they would spend money on trying to improve teaching standards rather than cutting class sizes.¬† Read more »

Couldn’t Labour find a NZ classroom for their photos?

The NZEI are staunch supporters of the Labour party, even helping them write their education policy.

You would think that Labour would have been easily able to source a Kiwi classroom image for their election messaging wouldn’t you?

Here is David Cunliffe pushing his lie about removing school fees.

The background photo isn‚Äôt from a Kiwi classroom. ¬† Read more »

Performance pay for teachers: Has the time come?

Labour may have done their friends at the NZIE and PPTA a disservice. ¬†By pushing really hard for more teachers, 2000 of them in fact, and quoting smaller class sizes as being the major factor in student success, it turns out the public aren’t buying the argument

Newstalk ZB on-line poll

Newstalk ZB on-line poll

It appears to be that the voters can see that better teachers are the ones that produce better results, not just more average ones giving you ¬†3-4% more attention… that’s if you actually get an extra teacher, because 2000 teachers isn’t even one per school.

The left have been very successful at making certain phrases sound scary to voters, and “bulk funding” and “performance pay” are two of them.

This is why National are using the teachers’ award system against the unions. ¬† Read more »

Labour’s flagship education policy is stillborn

Labour are truly bereft of original ideas, and they keep going back to the standard:  spend more money to solve a problem.

As we’ve often said, because Labour make it so necessary to say it, if spending more money solved problems, we could spend ourselves into health, prosperity and zero unemployment.

We all know it doesn’t work that way.

On the face of it 2000 extra teachers sounds like a great idea, until you think it through. ¬†Forget the actual cost of it right now, that’s the least of the problems with this policy.

Where are these 2000 teachers coming from?

Teachers colleges turn out several hundred a year.  So Cunliffe says old, tired, disillusioned teachers are going to be attracted to the profession.   And he will be looking at immigrants.

Let’s break that down a little further. ¬†Teachers that have given up on teaching already will need to be “encouraged”, but the whole payment and reward system of the teaching profession is diametrically opposed to anyone being paid even once cent more than anyone else with the same qualifactions, experience and responsibilities.

So, they won’t be getting any more money. ¬†It flies against everything the teachers unions stand for. ¬†Equality in everything, and all that.

So if you aren’t going to be able to pay or reward these teachers for coming back, what form will Labour incentives take?

These teachers coming back are disillusioned or retired. How are they going to hit the ground running with iPads, chromebooks, WiFi Internet?

These teachers coming back are disillusioned or retired. How are their colleagues going to accept them?  How would you like to be perceived as a burnt-out, disillusioned, retired teacher that only came back for whatever Labour is going to use to incentivise them?

How are your colleagues going to treat you, knowing you walked away from them in the past? ¬†You rejected the profession then, what’s changed? ¬†A Labour bribe?
Read more »

Waikato Times editorial slaps Hipkins too

Hipkins! ...eyes front and pay attention!

Hipkins! …cut the jibber jabber, eyes front and pay attention!

Chris Hipkins has tried to bag National Investing in Education Success (IES) plans as he goes about his ban-a-thon.

The Waikato Times have also acknowledged that he doesn’t know what he is talking about it and has failed to even notice the PPTA support.

Hipkins’ report card on Parata’s handling of the policy said a Labour Government would “almost certainly” dump it. Labour’s own model (to be announced within the next two weeks) would draw on teacher expertise to improve educational outcomes. But, according to the PPTA, that’s what Parata has done – and it welcomes the results.

Labour’s education spokesman, Chris Hipkins, has given Education Minister Hekia Parata a low mark for trying to introduce the expert teachers policy, “Investing in Educational Success”.

Because of the lack of input from school leaders, he said, she “has failed spectacularly” and “clearly needs to go back to school to learn what consultation actually means”. But perhaps Hipkins has failed to assess all the relevant material. Earlier this month, Parata released a report on the shaping of the $359 million policy to create a new career structure for teachers after consulting with the education sector.¬† Read more »