Paraphilias

I’ve always suspected that the rumours of Australians preferring sex with animals were true. All the jokes about sheep shagging…they had to come from somewhere. New Zealanders will find this latest antigay censorship decision from Australia’s Office of Film and Literature Classification perversely hilarious, given all the mutual sledging that goes on between our two nations over which country has the greatest propensity for zoophilia.

Now the Aussie censors have banned a gay movie because it depicts…shock horror…gay sex. The funny part is the censors allowed a movie that had blokes shagging donkeys.

This movie isn’t banned:

Real depictions of gay sex are apparently more shocking than real man-on-donkey action as Australian censors ban a gay movie that was due to screen at LGBT film festivals across the country this year.

Australian film censors have banned a movie that contains real sex between two male actors less than a year after they allowed a documentary that contained actual depictions of bestiality to screen at festivals.  Read more »

ᔥ Breitbart.com

Some people find outrage in the most silly of things. Take this ad for Skittles. John Nolte thinks it is all part of some conspiracy by corporate America to push bestiality…it’s the slippery slope you know…the same sorts of arguments that the opponents of marriage equality use…next thing they will allow polygamy…or marrying dogs…

“Pay special attention to the thoroughly disgusting sound effects. You can laugh and say it’s just a joke, but through a war of inches, Hollywood continues its assault to define deviancy down and to normalize destructive behavior.

If you don’t think there’s an agenda behind this, you haven’t been paying attention the last 40 years. And if you don’t think that there are those who hold the levers of power in our popular culture that would like to remove the stigma from bestiality, you don’t understand the depths of sexual depravity the human animal is capable of.”

I don’t know about you but the ad fails on two fronts for me. It doesn’t make me want to try Skittles…or fucking walruses!

The state of Victoria in Australia is making changes to remove the protection of name suppression for kiddy fiddlers:

The Victorian government will urgently consider repealing a law protecting the identities of child sex offenders.

But there are concerns such a change would increase the number of children harmed and encourage vigilante behaviour.

An inquiry headed by former Supreme Court judge Philip Cummins has made 90 recommendations to reform the state’s child protection system.

One of the most controversial, supported by a majority of the inquiry panel, is to repeal parts of the law relating to serious sex offenders that allows courts to suppress their names.

Premier Ted Baillieu says the government will seek advice from Victoria Police Chief Commissioner Ken Lay and other justice officials about the recommendation and consider the experience in other jurisdictions.

“The government will be urgently seeking advice to deal with this matter,” he told parliament on Wednesday.

“The interests of children will take priority and do take priority for this government.

“Protecting children, families and the wider community is this government’s first priority.”

Of course there are those who like to hug pedos:

The premier’s announcement followed Community Services Minister Mary Wooldridge saying on radio earlier on Wednesday that while she had personal sympathy for the recommendation, pedophiles’ rights had to be considered.

“We have to balance the rights of children and families also with … the rights of pedophiles,” she told Fairfax Radio.

Wrong. Pedophiles have no rights to even breathe.

Add this term to your political lexicon.

Political Necrophilia

(pə-lĭt’ĭ-kəl nĕk’rə-fĭl’ē-ə) also nec·roph‘i·lism (nĭ-krōf’ə-lĭz’əm, nĕ-)

n.

1. Obsessive fascination with political death and political corpses.

adj.

1. Of, relating to, or dealing with the structure or affairs of government, politics, or the state and politicians or issues that are dead to the public.
2. Relating to, involving, or characteristic of politics or politicians: “Calling on the auditor-general to investigate details of an MP who is dead politically “ .

Also known as “cuddling the corpse“.

Labour and especially Pete Hodgson, ironic as he is almost a political corpse himself,  just can’t seem to get it through their heads that the Pansy Wong issue is over. She has resigned, she has gone from parliament and the stench of her corpse is now stinking up them and not National. They did the same with Richard Worth and in fact keep bringing him up.

National has learned that when political meat goes off it is best to chuck it out the back-door. Labour however just seem to want to pick the corpse up and take it home. There comes a point though when cuddling the corpse becomes political necrophilia and you end up stinking of the dead yourself. That’s when corpse rooters usually get sprung, when the stench of the decomposing body starts to stink up their joint and their clothes and the stench pervades their own body.

They should beware of Political Necrophilia.

Oh just typical, a lawyer…who didn’t declare his conflict of interest, yes he was a lawyer acting for one of the those who shall not be named, says tougher penalties will work on stopping people breaking name suppression orders.

Philip Morgan QC from the Law Society’s Criminal Law Committee says the fines currently applicable aren’t big enough – and the Crown should have charged him with more serious offences.

The answer is more open-ness in our court system not tougher penalties. What a dick. Stick letters after their name, they think they are all important.

Philip Morgan QC supports tougher penalties for those seeking the naming and shaming of pedophiles and the continued hiding of pedophiles. Philip Morgan QC is now a Pedobear Approved lawyer. He will be a good mate of Simon “FIGJAM” Power’s for sure.

This week I was in court debating the failings of name suppression with a judge and the crown. Interestingly at the same time I was in court charged with naming violent sex offenders, pedophiles, rapists and dirty doctors one of their pedo pals was appearing in court in Australia for sentencing.

In Australia there is no name suppression like pedos and criminals use to hide behind here in New Zealand. There is one of the pretense of “protecting the victims” because in Australia they know that no one will ever bring the victim into the case. So while Judge Harvey sneered at me and described some of my lawyers arguments as reprehensible regarding the alleged identification of victims we can watch how a real trial of a disgusting pedophile is conducted in Sydney.

The 14-month-old girl had an inkling of the imminent sexual attack on her.

She tried desperately to crawl away from the man, but was grabbed by the legs and dragged across the bed so that the vile assault could begin, a Sydney court has been told.

She screamed and struggled in vain as her nappy was ripped off.

The toddler was one of eight victims molested by David Shane Whitby, who in July was found guilty of 120 child sex offences.

He assaulted children over a 10-year period, photographing and filming the acts.

If this case was held in New Zealand I would bet you dollars to a knob of goat crap that some liberal know it all judge would be applying name suppression vigorously so that the pedo criminal could attempt to be rehabilitated. We sure has hell wouldn’t be allowed to know the name of a man convicted of 120 child sex offenses, after all one judge thought that having 300,000 pornographic images, many of children was on the light side of offending and since none of the children were from New Zealand (how could he have known that?) then the dirty doctor who had all the porno on his ACC supplied computer could remain anonymous.

As Judge Harvey reserves his judgement he should perhaps think very carefully about the wisdom of maintaining a law that actually protects criminals and certainly whilst it may provide slight shadow of protection to victims allows new victims to be created when these monsters are allowed to remain anonymous.

Pedobear Simon Power should also reflect on his refusal to allow an equivalent of Megan’s Law to be enacted because he and his staff are too busy trying to stop adults drinking, The liberal elite’s policies of hugging criminals have demonstrably failed, it is time to return to punishments that hurt.

At least in Australia people can choose to now whether or not they wish to live next door to a convicted pedophile, safe in the knowledge that when he gets out of jail he won’t be hiding behind name suppression.

via Keeping Stock

Name Suppression Pedobear

A violent rapist will live in the community under a supervision order, despite expert evidence that he poses a high risk of reoffending.

But the community will not know the man’s identity, with the judge suppressing his name and whereabouts, saying the potential adverse effect of publicity on his rehabilitation outweighed the principle of open justice.

The man was convicted of raping a 15-year-old girl in the 1990s. After being freed from jail, he pleaded guilty to charges of possessing objectionable material. He has been freed under an order of extended supervision for 10 years – the maximum a judge can impose.

Justice Alan MacKenzie ordered that the man’s name, address and identifying details be suppressed.

“The possible effect on rehabilitation does outweigh the general principle of open justice here,” he said in the High Court at Wellington.

Several reports given to the court concluded the man’s overall risk of reoffending was “medium to high”.

“If he continues to demonstrate a number of characteristics which have been seen to be revealed by the testing, there is a high probability … that he will engage in serious sexual offending involving violent sexual assault within five years of release, with this risk remaining over 10 years,” Justice MacKenzie said.

“This offending will place female adults and adolescents under the age of 16 years at risk.”

Judge Alan MacKenzie earns the Pedobear seal of approval. He acknowledges that this pedo-rapist is a risk to the community then he refuses to protect that community by placing the burqa of name suppression over his name and details.

Poor diddums to the pedophile if his naming and shaming will set back his rehabilitation. He should have thought about that when he started diddling kids.

If any other child is harmed then Judge Alan MacKenzie should be the one in the dock not this anonymous pedophile. If Pedobear Power won’t bring in name and shame via our own Megan’s law then I think it is only right to name and shame pedo-friendly judges.

A primary school that sacked a teacher for possessing child pornography and bestiality images had failed to tell the Teachers Council.

The Hutt Valley man, who has permanent name suppression, lost his job after his offending was revealed in 2008 and was last year convicted of 46 charges of possessing objectionable images.

Teachers Council regulations say that all employers must report the dismissal of a teacher or if they believe that a teacher is engaged in serious misconduct.

Council director Peter Lind said yesterday the organisation became aware of the charges against the Hutt Valley teacher through a media article.

After the council made inquiries, the man’s former employer reported the matter, which triggered the formal disciplinary inquiry. The teacher has now been deregistered.

The school was not disciplined for failing to report the matter, Lind said.

“We just keep educating our members and we sent the school a reminder of its obligations,” he said.

They wouldn’t nor shouldn’t have to rely on employers reporting sickos like this if they couldn’t hide behind name suppression.

Meanwhile the hiding continues amongst police, lawyers, teachers, doctors, rugby stars, tv comedians, and ex-MPs

Cop accused of indecent exposure
New Zealand Herald
The detective has been given interim name suppression by Judge Sharon McAuslan. No reasons were given. got homesick and called his Mum to come and pick him …

At least one judge seems to see it clearly, if a little belatedly.

A 43-year-old Christchurch man wept today as he was jailed for 12 years for the sexual abuse of two small girls.

Christchurch District Court Judge Michael Radford also ended Andrew Shane Walker’s name suppression, telling him: “This offending is so repugnant that the strongest possible deterrence is required.”

Walker pleaded guilty to two charges of indecent assault and two of sexual violation by unlawful sexual connection, the Christchurch Court News website reported.

Judge Radford said he rejected any suggestion by defence counsel Nick Rout that the offending was less serious because it involved oral sex rather than rape.

“The degradation that you imposed on these children is appalling,” he said.

The charges involved offending more than once against each girl. One of them was aged only six when an offence was committed…

…The judge told Walker: “I cannot think there is any good reason to suppress your name. There will be no order for name suppression.”

Why did he have name suppression in the first place? It can’t have been for the protection of the complainants because he has been named now, destroying any argument that name suppression of the offender is somehow there to protect the complainants.

The Law Commission’s report is woefully inadequate, their answer is to increase penalties for breaching name suppression. I think the simple solution to the farce that is name suppression is to remove it altogether.

Labour (Trevor Mallard) currently has an online poll asking for your opinion on the matter. FIGJAM won’t listen because he knows all, but Labour might, go and vote in their poll.