pedophilia

The state of Victoria in Australia is making changes to remove the protection of name suppression for kiddy fiddlers:

The Victorian government will urgently consider repealing a law protecting the identities of child sex offenders.

But there are concerns such a change would increase the number of children harmed and encourage vigilante behaviour.

An inquiry headed by former Supreme Court judge Philip Cummins has made 90 recommendations to reform the state’s child protection system.

One of the most controversial, supported by a majority of the inquiry panel, is to repeal parts of the law relating to serious sex offenders that allows courts to suppress their names.

Premier Ted Baillieu says the government will seek advice from Victoria Police Chief Commissioner Ken Lay and other justice officials about the recommendation and consider the experience in other jurisdictions.

“The government will be urgently seeking advice to deal with this matter,” he told parliament on Wednesday.

“The interests of children will take priority and do take priority for this government.

“Protecting children, families and the wider community is this government’s first priority.”

Of course there are those who like to hug pedos:

The premier’s announcement followed Community Services Minister Mary Wooldridge saying on radio earlier on Wednesday that while she had personal sympathy for the recommendation, pedophiles’ rights had to be considered.

“We have to balance the rights of children and families also with … the rights of pedophiles,” she told Fairfax Radio.

Wrong. Pedophiles have no rights to even breathe.

Useless is what our current laws are when a creepy pedo is hiding himself behind name suppression laws.

Name suppression has been granted to a 33-year-old Napier man facing a raft of indecency charges after police found thousands of images of local children on his computer.

The unemployed Onekawa man appeared before Judge Geoff Rea in Napier District Court facing six charges of doing an indecent act.

His arrest came early this morning after police were tipped off by the public to a potential sighting of the man, who had been seen taking photos while driving past schools on a number of occasions in the past few weeks.

On both prior occasions he was reported to have been in a silver car.

Police found the man in his car at the Maadi Rd, Onekawa, shops shortly after 8.30am and had to use pepper spray after he became aggressive. A camera was found in his possession.

Detective Sergeant Tim Smith said police searched the man’s home shortly after his arrest and found around 1200 images of young girls and mothers walking babies on a USB stick as well as “objectionable” material on CDs and DVDs.

It appears the photos were taken locally as well as in Taupo said Mr Smith.

He asked for name suppression so he could inform his family and his soon to be ex-girlfriend.

I thought that was what newspapers were for?

Oh just typical, a lawyer…who didn’t declare his conflict of interest, yes he was a lawyer acting for one of the those who shall not be named, says tougher penalties will work on stopping people breaking name suppression orders.

Philip Morgan QC from the Law Society’s Criminal Law Committee says the fines currently applicable aren’t big enough – and the Crown should have charged him with more serious offences.

The answer is more open-ness in our court system not tougher penalties. What a dick. Stick letters after their name, they think they are all important.

Philip Morgan QC supports tougher penalties for those seeking the naming and shaming of pedophiles and the continued hiding of pedophiles. Philip Morgan QC is now a Pedobear Approved lawyer. He will be a good mate of Simon “FIGJAM” Power’s for sure.

I see one of the Interesting Names is in the paper again.

A doctor has been suspended from practising for nine months after pleading guilty to possessing images of child sex abuse.

The doctor, whose name is suppressed, was sentenced to four months’ home detention after admitting 25 charges of possessing objectionable material and one charge of distributing an objectionable publication.

The material was found on the doctor’s computer and an external hard drive which contained over 400,000 files, 290,000 of which related to images of young girls in explicit sexual poses.

In a decision released by the Health Practitioners Disciplinary Tribunal today, the doctor had his registration suspended for nine months from the date of the hearing – July 26, 2010.

The tribunal also imposed several conditions for three years after the suspension ended, including that he comply with ongoing counselling, ongoing oversight by the health committee of the Medical Council, and that he undergo a psychiatric assessment confirming fitness to practise before he was re-registered. He was also ordered to pay $6000 costs.

In its findings, the tribunal said the doctor had a psychiatric diagnosis of paraphilia, which involved compulsive masturbation and the use of images when masturbating. This was apparently under control as a result of medication he was now taking.

I’m not sure the people of what ever town this paraphile is likely to inhabit are going to be too keen on having him look at their children for medical attention. But that is no matter, because we all can’t know who he is because Judge Grant Fraser thinks:

“In this case there is no offending against any individuals within the New Zealand community.”

Like how could he possibly know that? Did the judge personally sight every single one of the 400,000 images, including the more than 290,000 images of children and positively identify each one as from overseas? Does that matter that his victims were from overseas?

Isn’t it amazing that the truth is leaking out…when first reported it was “many images” to more than 10,000 and now a staggering 290,000 images of children. But the Judge saw this at e light end of the scale. Judge Grant Fraser is clearly pedo-friendly and gets the Pedobear seal of approval.

All I can say is don’t get sick/burn yourself in the Manawatu.

This case remains an outrage, luckily for the Health Practitioners Disciplinary Tribunal they can rely on Judge grant Fraser’s pedo-friendly ruling to allow the Dirty Doctor to remain hidden behind the mask of the Burqa of our Justice System.

This week I was in court debating the failings of name suppression with a judge and the crown. Interestingly at the same time I was in court charged with naming violent sex offenders, pedophiles, rapists and dirty doctors one of their pedo pals was appearing in court in Australia for sentencing.

In Australia there is no name suppression like pedos and criminals use to hide behind here in New Zealand. There is one of the pretense of “protecting the victims” because in Australia they know that no one will ever bring the victim into the case. So while Judge Harvey sneered at me and described some of my lawyers arguments as reprehensible regarding the alleged identification of victims we can watch how a real trial of a disgusting pedophile is conducted in Sydney.

The 14-month-old girl had an inkling of the imminent sexual attack on her.

She tried desperately to crawl away from the man, but was grabbed by the legs and dragged across the bed so that the vile assault could begin, a Sydney court has been told.

She screamed and struggled in vain as her nappy was ripped off.

The toddler was one of eight victims molested by David Shane Whitby, who in July was found guilty of 120 child sex offences.

He assaulted children over a 10-year period, photographing and filming the acts.

If this case was held in New Zealand I would bet you dollars to a knob of goat crap that some liberal know it all judge would be applying name suppression vigorously so that the pedo criminal could attempt to be rehabilitated. We sure has hell wouldn’t be allowed to know the name of a man convicted of 120 child sex offenses, after all one judge thought that having 300,000 pornographic images, many of children was on the light side of offending and since none of the children were from New Zealand (how could he have known that?) then the dirty doctor who had all the porno on his ACC supplied computer could remain anonymous.

As Judge Harvey reserves his judgement he should perhaps think very carefully about the wisdom of maintaining a law that actually protects criminals and certainly whilst it may provide slight shadow of protection to victims allows new victims to be created when these monsters are allowed to remain anonymous.

Pedobear Simon Power should also reflect on his refusal to allow an equivalent of Megan’s Law to be enacted because he and his staff are too busy trying to stop adults drinking, The liberal elite’s policies of hugging criminals have demonstrably failed, it is time to return to punishments that hurt.

At least in Australia people can choose to now whether or not they wish to live next door to a convicted pedophile, safe in the knowledge that when he gets out of jail he won’t be hiding behind name suppression.

via Keeping Stock

Name Suppression Pedobear

A violent rapist will live in the community under a supervision order, despite expert evidence that he poses a high risk of reoffending.

But the community will not know the man’s identity, with the judge suppressing his name and whereabouts, saying the potential adverse effect of publicity on his rehabilitation outweighed the principle of open justice.

The man was convicted of raping a 15-year-old girl in the 1990s. After being freed from jail, he pleaded guilty to charges of possessing objectionable material. He has been freed under an order of extended supervision for 10 years – the maximum a judge can impose.

Justice Alan MacKenzie ordered that the man’s name, address and identifying details be suppressed.

“The possible effect on rehabilitation does outweigh the general principle of open justice here,” he said in the High Court at Wellington.

Several reports given to the court concluded the man’s overall risk of reoffending was “medium to high”.

“If he continues to demonstrate a number of characteristics which have been seen to be revealed by the testing, there is a high probability … that he will engage in serious sexual offending involving violent sexual assault within five years of release, with this risk remaining over 10 years,” Justice MacKenzie said.

“This offending will place female adults and adolescents under the age of 16 years at risk.”

Judge Alan MacKenzie earns the Pedobear seal of approval. He acknowledges that this pedo-rapist is a risk to the community then he refuses to protect that community by placing the burqa of name suppression over his name and details.

Poor diddums to the pedophile if his naming and shaming will set back his rehabilitation. He should have thought about that when he started diddling kids.

If any other child is harmed then Judge Alan MacKenzie should be the one in the dock not this anonymous pedophile. If Pedobear Power won’t bring in name and shame via our own Megan’s law then I think it is only right to name and shame pedo-friendly judges.

I used to have some respect for Colin James. Now I have nothing but contempt for the sad little man. The reason is because Google has revealed an uncanny coincidence that Colin James seems to run stories for and on behalf of Simon “Pedobear” Power.

In fact the articles are sick inducing and provide proof positive that Pedobear Power, the friendly politician of pedophiles and criminals should not only and in his man card but also his National party credentials. The man is a bleeding heart pinko sooky liberal and a disgrace that he ever got selected as a National party candidate in the first place.

Back in February, Colin James wrote a puff piece on Pedobear Power and how he is the savour of our justice system. It is buckets full of vomit bad.

In the end laws get changed because politicians in parties change them (judges have a hand, too, at times). The best citizens can expect is that politicians respond.

Hence Power’s interest in what he calls the legal system, which he thinks is too much the legal priesthood’s preserve.

Citizens can directly influence the administration of the law only by becoming part of that priesthood themselves. Some are dragooned on to a jury where judges and lawyers belittle them by deciding what evidence they can hear and what of the evidence they do hear they are allowed to take seriously.

That legal system is not for ordinary folk.

Power, a lawyer by training but with a leavening of academic politics, has set out to make some changes. (Though not for the belittled juries.)

He has pushed victims’ rights on to courts’ agendas, marginalised when criminal law muscled into tort law, and procedural changes to the way sexual violence cases are treated in court. The aim is better justice — or just some justice. The law and justice do not always coincide.

Yes Simon “Pedobear” Power’s solution for victim’s rights is actually protecting the rights of pedophiles and criminals from real justice. He doesn’t care about victims int eh traditional sense, he cares about ‘victims‘ that are actually criminals ‘let down by society’. And he cares for the pockets of his lawyer mates.

His office has also been sitting on the report from the Law Commission about name Suppression with nary a peep out of him despite the report being written by fellow judicial, liberal, pinko, meddler Geoffrey Palmer. Instead of following what the public wants Palmer and Pedobear claim that the solution to the name suppression issue is tougher penalties for people breaking name suppression. Reality would actually beg to differ. The problem with name suppression is that liberal judges and lawyers like Palmer and Pedobear ignore the wishes of real victims and continue to hide pedo teachers, lawyers, sports stars and the like from actually facing up to their despicable crimes.

They prefer the burqa of justice, name suppression, to veil the ugly, heinous criminals when publicity and vitriol should instead be used. Today is no different. Colin James has again enabled the Pedobear and today’s Dompost article (not online) is even more sick inducing.

Ready your sick bags.

SIMON POWER wants to reclaim the justice system for the people. He has made a start. He reckons it will take him another two to three years. He will outline his next steps in a speech to the law profession and academics at Otago University this month (planned for Wednesday but postponed because the funeral of Lieutenant Tim O’Donnell, a constituent, is that day). The law industry is unlikely to rush to congratulate him.

The Government is known more for its law-and-order hard line. Last month Corrections Minister Judith Collins celebrated the economic value of the new South Auckland prison: $1.2 billion over 30 years. Social and human defeat is trumpeted as economic victory. And just in time: the construction sector is in a parlous state.

Oh the old Judith bad, Pedobear good lines. Simon Power must have been taking a shellacking in caucus and cabinet recently, so much so that he has resorted to little whispering campaigns and pet churnalists writing puff pieces. Pedobear Power is a legend in his own mind and those of his captured and sycophantic staff who have so far spectacularly failed to deliver anything and had to leave it to the only minister who has achieved real successes to deliver in his portfolio. Pedobear is too busy protecting pedophiles and criminals to implement real law changes, instead he focusing on denying accessible legal support to the poor and broken of South Auckland in order to protect the revenue streams of the high street lawyers who like to think they know best.

The Justice Wilson email saga shows clearly just how out to lunch most of these liberal elite are. It is no surprise then for me to see that in amongst those email conversations is a link to my own cases before the courts on page 22. Does this saga and the revelations that our legal fraternity are in reality a cosy little club and the fact that I named one of the members of this little club mean that my case and Pedobear’s reluctance to address the name suppression issue show there is some sort of nudge-nudge-wink-wink carry-on involved. That could be just craziness on my part, but the dots have been joining for some time. Right enough with the conspiracy theories, and back to Simon Power Colin James’ article about our heroic but little understood justice minister (I used little letters on purpose, he doesn’t deserve capitals).

Mr Power has gone along but, as a liberal, he has a stronger interest in reform than repression. He wants courts to be more expeditious and more solicitous of victims and witnesses. He has perturbed and angered practitioners whose reverence for tradition and precedence favours incremental change as a cornerstone. Critics – uncommonly articulate, given their trade – point to 40-year-old Mr Power’s youth and mere five years in legal practice.

Actually, youth and legal training have emboldened him. Non-lawyer justice ministers can be bamboozled by the trade.

That couple of paragraphs was actually Colin James fellating Simon Power. Pedobear Power is just bamboozled and enjoying watching Colin James clean muck out of his beard.

His focus is now on three areas. One is more flexible processes, including an inquisitorial approach, to complement the greater flexibility courts have allowed in dealing with young offenders and in family cases. Mr Power wants that flexibility applied to other “stakeholders”, such as victims and witnesses (often forced to relive nasty experiences by heavy-hitting defence lawyers) and jurors.

This is all well and good, but now add in the debacle the Wilson case and resulting emails have shown our Justice system to be and now Simon Power’s youthful enthusiasm for reforming the courts down liberal lines just looks like a disaster of his own making. Anyone who uses the word “stake-holders” needs fifty lashes on the pee-pee with a wet shoelace anyhow, just to teach them. The real stake-holders (to use civil servant speak) are the public of New Zealand who have been let down for fifty years by wet, sopping, pinko liberals like Simon Power. If fifty years of cuddling criminals hasn’t shown us that it doesn’t work then perhaps a few weeks in a cell with some of these ‘mis-understood individuals’ might make Pedobear understand a bit better.

Mr Power is not just liberal. He is also a family man, with two young children. When he talks of the courts belonging to the people, children are very much part of his people. This is a young man talking. Venerable judges take note.

Colin James - Pedobear Seal of Approval

This makes it even more perplexing, that as a father, he refuses to enact a NZ version of Megan’s law or Sarah’s law, instead preferring the lines and excuses of the liberals. If children are very much part of his people then why not action on naming and shaming pedos? Why not action on removing the burqa of name suppression from our justice system and why not action putting criminals in jail for a long time so that they can’t hurt children anymore?

I’ll tell you why not, because Simon Power is all pin-stripes and bullshit, he wakes every morning and stands in front of the mirror and says to himself “F*ck I’m Good, Just Ask Me”.

Colin James can now also sport the pedobear stamp of approval after those sick inducing liberal cry pieces on behalf of a protector of pedophiles.

I was charged with naming this now convicted kiddy fiddler teacher.

Name suppression has been lifted on a former North Shore primary school teacher who was today sentenced to home detention for sexual grooming and misconduct involving two underage boys.

Michael James Dobbyn, 52, has today been sentenced to 12 months home detention and 250 hours community work for four charges against two boys who were aged 10 and 12 when the first offences took place.

The charges were two of sexual conduct with a young person under 16, and two of meeting a young person under the age of 16 following sexual grooming.

Dressed in a black jacket sports jacket and business pants, Dobbyn shook and clutched onto beams supporting the dock at the North Shore District Court.

The conditions of his sentence are that he does not interact with anyone under the age of 16, the victims, or their families.

He is not allowed to leave his home except to attend doctors or counselling appointments and must complete a Safe course for sex offenders.

He has also been ordered not to go to shops between 3pm and 7pm.

Of course now that we know who he is the public can monitor his behaviour and contact with children. They never could have if his name suppression had remained. It begs the question as to why he had name suppression in the first place. Of course now that he is named I wonder if the Police will continue to pursue the prosecution on this particular charge of mine.

The Onion addresses that which the Catholic Church refuses to. Sorry for having to do a “Farrar” but it is too good not to “Farrar” the whole piece interspersed with trite one-liners.

VATICAN CITY—Calling the behavior shameful, sinful, and much more frequent than the Vatican was comfortable with, Pope Benedict XVI vowed this week to bring the widespread pedophilia within the Roman Catholic Church down to a more manageable level.

Addressing thousands gathered at St. Peter’s Square on Easter Sunday, the pontiff offered his “most humble apologies” to abuse victims, and pledged to reduce the total number of molestations by 60 percent over the next five years.

“This is absolutely unacceptable,” Pope Benedict said. “It seems a weakening of faith in God has prevented our priests from exercising moderation when sexually abusing helpless minors.”

“And let me remind our clergy of the holy vows they all took when they entered the priesthood,” he continued. “They should know that they’re only allowed one small child every other month.”

This seems more like real reporting than satire.

The pope said he was deeply disappointed to learn that the number of children sexually abused by priests was almost 10 times beyond the allowable limit clearly outlined in church doctrine. Admitting for the first time in public that the overindulgent touching of “tender, tender young flesh” had become a full-blown crisis, the Holy Father vowed to implement new reforms to bring the pedophilia rate back down to five children per 1,000 clergy.

“The truth is there will always be a little bit of molestation—it’s simply unavoidable,” Vatican spokesperson Rev. Federico Lombardi said. “But the fact that young boys have gotten much more attractive over the past few decades is no excuse for the blatant defiance of church limits that have been in place for centuries.”

“The majority of priests don’t want to molest kids at all,” he added. “But for those who do, we must make sure they’re doing it at a reasonable rate.”

Sorry but this is high quality satire, my eyes are now watering.

Following the pope’s speech, the Vatican released a statement outlining its plan to reduce pedophilia. Starting next year, specially trained cardinals will make unannounced visits to inspect and observe random churches in order to ensure they are not going beyond diocese-wide molestation caps. The inspector-cardinals will grade each parish based on long, private interviews with altar boys in darkened church basements, and careful observation of priests’ sexual activity.

These senior officials will also have the authority to enforce harsh punishments for any clergy member violating his allotment of pedophilia.

“If a priest goes even one child over the limit, there will be hell to pay,” said Prefect Emeritus of the Congregation for Bishops Giovanni Battista Re, explaining the Vatican’s new “Three Strikes, You’re Out Rule.” “After the third offense, the offending priest will immediately be moved to another parish. This will give officials time to investigate the case, and will act as an effective deterrent since it usually takes months for priests to gain the trust of the new children.”

As a “goodwill measure,” Cardinal Re said all churches will also be required to display a sign next to the altar showing the number of days since the last molestation.

Love the 3 strikes rule, it is the same as the one for kiddy-fiddling teachers in New Zealand.

Criticism of the pope’s new plan has already begun to emerge from within the Catholic Church itself. Rev. Walter Moore, a pastor at St. Peter’s in Chicago, questioned the Vatican’s methodology in calculating the molestation rates, saying the church’s inconsistent definition of pedophilia may have skewed the numbers.

“Is it technically pedophilia if the child’s clothes are fully on the entire time? What if he’s asleep when it happens?” Moore said. “It’s time we had some clear guidance from Rome on this issue. For instance, the church counts it as one incident regardless of whether the child is molested multiple times by the same individual or by two priests at once. That’s just plain wrong.”

“Plus, if it’s supposed to be a special secret between the priest and the boy, is it even any of the church’s business in the first place?” he added. “Maybe Brandon is just trying to get attention.”

My god, my sides are hurting. The Onion has got the excuses of kiddy-fiddlers spot on.

The Vatican would not release details of the pope’s upcoming world tour, in which he plans to clear up any confusion on the matter by personally demonstrating what constitutes molestation.