Referendum

Why BCIR is a dumb idea

Andrew Geddis can’t type my name, but I can not only type his and use it in a post but also link to his very good explanation of the ill-conceived idiocy of the cult of Colin Craig regarding binding citizen initiated referenda.

Colin Craig has just one thing he wants from National in any post-election deal. Unfortunately, it’s something that National isn’t able to give him.

[...]

the Conservative Party’s announcement of their “bottom line” policy demand before supporting National post-election strikes me as a major disincentive to National ushering them into the House. As the NZ Herald reports Craig:

“The thing that we want, that will be required if a party wants our support, is that they are going to need to agree to a change whereby that the people of this country have the right on those rare occasions … to tell the government where to go and what to do.”

He later told reporters it may not be enough for National to step aside and give him an uncontested race in the East Coast Bays seat, where he is a candidate.

“We’d want to see referendum get across the line, that’s the one thing that matters for us.”

Conservatives would not go into coalition or enter a confidence and supply agreement unless this condition was met.

Mr Craig said: “We’re not going to be unconstructive, but in terms of getting our full support, that is our bottom line. That is what we want to achieve.”

Let’s pay Craig and his party the courtesy of accepting that they really, really mean what they say on this matter. Unless National give them this policy outcome, they won’t give any guarantee of support for it in office. The problem they face is that there is no way that National on its own (or even in conjunction with the Conservatives) can deliver what they are demanding.

Why can’t BCIR be delivered as the Cult of Colin Craig demands?

there is no doubting that adopting such a measure would represent a fundamental change to the entire constitutional order of New Zealand. And fundamental constitutional changes shouldn’t be made by bare-majority governments on a straight party line vote. It’s constitutionally improper to even suggest that this happen – it would be like the Maori Party saying that their price for supporting a Government would be for that Government to legislate via a bare parliamentary majority to make the Treaty of Waitangi a “higher law” constitutional document that could be used to strike down other laws. I don’t care whether you think that would be a good outcome; it would be a bad way to bring it about.

Now, maybe Craig doesn’t mean that he wants National (with his Party’s help) to bring in binding referendums directly. Maybe he wants the issue itself to be put to a referendum, so that the people of New Zealand can decide for themselves whether or not to make the change. If that is what he means, then he really should say so. Because what he’s calling for at the moment – a fundamental constitutional change carried out by a bare majority in Parliament – is improper, and I just don’t think National should for one minute think about agreeing to do it.

Read more »

It’s called a cheque Colin, and stuff all people use them these days

This is a quote from Colin Craig:

“I couldn’t even buy stationary at the shop this morning, without giving the man behind the counter a signed autograph.”

A signed autograph? Really? You autographed an autograph? Was it your dad?

The man is a complete muppet.

Stupidly he is also going toe to toe with Winston Peters, who is loving the attention and promising crazy policies like BCIR.

If National wants Conservative Party support it will have to make referendums binding, says the party’s leader Colin Craig.

He’s used his keynote speech at the party’s annual conference this weekend to highlight the party’s policy as a “bottom line” for any coalition negotiations.

Speaking to about 120 of the party’s rank and file, Craig said National was running a “nanny state”, that had grown “too big and too proud”.

“It’s time the government was smaller, it’s time the government was more efficient and it’s time the government was beholden to the people who voted them in.   Read more »

Don’t believe everything you read in the Herald

Astonishing really…wrong in the heading, wrong in the stand first…

heraldbomb

 

The actual number of votes addd tot he count is more like 35,000…the body of the article explains.

Of the additional votes counted, 24,866 were against the asset sales while 10,035 were in favour.

The final result is that 920,188 or 67.3 per cent of votes cast were against the programme while 442,985 or 32.4 per cent were in favour.

A check of the Electoral Commission website for the preliminary results vs the Final results shows it is about 35,000.

Simple stuff really.

Dompost on Asset Sales Referendum

The Dompost is somewhat emphatic in their mockery of the Greens and Labour.

To listen to Labour and the Greens one would think the Government had no choice but to begin buying back state assets following the referendum on state asset sales.

According to Labour leader David Cunliffe the people “clamoured” to have their voices heard and they have “spoken” against the partial sales of Mighty River Power, Meridian Energy and Air New Zealand.

According to Green party co-leader Russel Norman the referendum has shown the prime minister is out of touch with mainstream New Zealand.

There is only one problem for Mr Cunliffe and Dr Norman. The referendum on state asset sales was not the first held under the Citizens Initiated Referenda Act 1993. It was the fifth.   Read more »

The Huddle

newstalkzb

I was on Larry Williams show The Huddle with Josie Pagani for the last time this year.

Our topics were:

The Avatar film deal ongoing incentives programme announced this morning to put a shot in the arm of a very very lacklustre film industry. The government is caught between a rock and a hard place here. The liberal elites arts bludgers always have their hands out for more like a proverbial modern day Oliver Twist, and on the other hand when the government hands out the corporate welfare to billionaires the same moaners from the left who decry that not enough is spent will now cry that John Key is helping out his rich mates again. You know my position…bludging is bludging, no matter the clothes you wear.

There there is Len’s pathetic apology to the council. He should be resigning not apologising. He’s still lied and used council money to pay for his texting to his mistress as well as used free hotel rooms at Sky City – all the while changing his stance on the convention centre deal, not to mention his use of the chauffeur driven car to run his floosie all over town. He’s not fronting to the media or any public outings – how long can he survive? He is a lame duck mayor.  Read more »

The Huddle at 1740

newstalkzb

I will be on Larry Williams show The Huddle with Josie Pagani for the last time this year.

Our topics may include:

The Avatar film deal ongoing incentives programme announced this morning to put a shot in the arm of a very very lacklustre film industry. The government is caught between a rock and a hard place here. The liberal elites arts bludgers always have their hands out for more like a proverbial modern day Oliver Twist, and on the other hand when the government hands out the corporate welfare to billionaires the same moaners from the left who decry that not enough is spent will now cry that John Key is helping out his rich mates again. You know my position…bludging is bludging, no matter the clothes you wear.  Read more »

Cartoon of the Day

BURN UP

Credit: SonofaMin

Balanced reporting. I’ll be damned.

3 News:

br

Both sides of the story, let the public make the decision.

Awesome.

The Green Party Data scammers: Look at their Guidelines

Via the Tipline

An interesting post scanned and captured from an over-excited contributor to the [Standard made] earlier.  Is this what the Greens plan to do with information stolen from their petition harvesting?

early

The Green Party hid behind the old fools in Grey Power for the Assets petition, then sent out paid touts on taxpayers’ money to scoop up data. Like Greenpeace, they love a petition. Do you think it is only because they are wound up about this issue? No, it is because they want to capture your personal details to create a data base.   Read more »

Sell. Sell. Sell.

Headline?   John Key saying the Referendum was a waste of time, proves there is no mandate for change, and was just a political stunt.

Hands up who’s surprised?

Prime Minister John Key says the contentious partial asset sales programme will continue despite the provisional results of the share offer referendum.

More than 1.3 million New Zealanders cast votes in the non-binding citizens initiated referendum; with the preliminary result released on Friday night showing 67.2 per cent did not support the Government’s partial sell-off of Air New Zealand, Mighty River Power, Genesis Power and Meridian Energy.

Only 32.5 per cent of those who cast a vote backed the share floats.

All-up, just 44 per cent of eligible voters took part in the referendum.

Key, speaking this afternoon at the former Hobsonville Airbase north-west of Auckland, described the referendum as a “publicity stunt” which had cost the tax-payer up to $9m.

“Around about a quarter of New Zealanders voted against asset sales,” Key said.   Read more »